Originally posted by: NutBucket
Well, to be fair, when I started becoming a computer "enthusaist", the hot chip was a Celeron 300A. AMD was who back then? I guess if I had remained an enthusiast I would have transitioned to AMD but that never happened.Originally posted by: MS Dawn
This brings up a funny discussion I had with someone a few weeks ago.
They compared computers with cars and said that the two are similar as the "enthusiast crowd" prefer inferior things - the manual gearbox and AMD processors. So I asked why is AMD inferior and they go on to tell me that (AMD) doesn't even have a 3.0GHz CPU yet and is light years behind Intel. I laughed so hard I actually snorted and (honestly) I RARELY do that. :laugh:
you are a N00b....
AMD was kickign butt back in the 386/486 days with the 486DX2 80 fastest 486 you could get at the time...
they have always been a force to be delt with..
they were just under the radar.
lol Celery 300A.. man how old are you...
that was like not even 10 years back lol...
