lxskllr
No Lifer
@lxskllr health effects from eating meat, and incoming meat shortage bullshit are 2 different things. The USDA is trying to soften the impact of the drought, citing all sorts of stuff.
They pulled some ideas from Johns Hopkins and ran with it, along with global warming, women in poverty, evil meat industry representatives, overpopulation, and destroying the environment.
I think both things are true but for different reasons. In terms of the drought buy meat while its still cheap(The opposite of what they say), and in terms of health we probably eat too much meat. It shouldn't be used as justification to convince people to eat less meat before the drought hits as that is rather disingenuous by my standards.
I can't find the article with a quick look, unless you're talking about that 313pg pdf. I'm not up to reading all that. I have my own views of meat consumption, and honestly am not interested in changing, or being an activist one way or the other.
Speaking in general terms, the government shouldn't be bending truth to further goals. If some of the claims are speculative, they should be listed as such, and sources should be cited supporting their position. If it's especially controversial, links supporting the most popular alternate view would be nice also.
As stated, I didn't read their exact presentation, but it makes sense to me to cut down eating meat while it's still cheap. That gives people time to adapt, and it's less of a shock when you have to cut down from necessity. Gorging on meat for a year, and then cutting way back due to cost leaves people feeling deprived, angry, and unknowledgeable on how to handle it. If they've already started cutting back while it's cheap, the shock will be greatly reduced, and they'll realize it isn't the end of the world. They've had time to prepare, and have seen first hand meat isn't required for every meal. Maybe they'll just say "Fuck it. That was easy. I think I'll change it to 'Meat Monday', and only eat meat once a week.". Alternately, they may realize that a huge slab of animal isn't required for a meal, and will take would would have been consumed in one day, and stretch it out over a few days.
Point is, it's better to be proactive, than reactive. That applies to everything, and not just food. People, and Americans in particular need to start thinking beyond the next quarter. We fuck ourselves over and over in three month increments, and to have a better life, that needs to stop.