- Aug 15, 2000
- 52,763
- 1
- 0
No, I just hate the thought of being that much closer to crack monkeys like you.C'mon, tell us the truth, the TRUE reason for your objection is that you're afraid of needles and hate the sight of blood...right?
nik
No, I just hate the thought of being that much closer to crack monkeys like you.C'mon, tell us the truth, the TRUE reason for your objection is that you're afraid of needles and hate the sight of blood...right?
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
No, I just hate the thought of being that much closer to crack monkeys like you.C'mon, tell us the truth, the TRUE reason for your objection is that you're afraid of needles and hate the sight of blood...right?
nik
Originally posted by: X-Man
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
No, I just hate the thought of being that much closer to crack monkeys like you.C'mon, tell us the truth, the TRUE reason for your objection is that you're afraid of needles and hate the sight of blood...right?
nik
Tell us how you really feel, Nik.
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Originally posted by: visgf
There are several reasons the US has cited when denying a person the right to marry. Syphilis, other marriages, homosexuality. To many, these reasons appear to be utterly ridiculous, but there are some out there who firmly believe that these restrictions need to be in place, and they just happen to have been making the laws at the time. The only way to reverse these restrictions is to get the laws reversed or expanded. If you're so uptight about this, get a petition started and get it to several of your state lawmakers.
Why? If you had been READING THE DAMN THREAD, you'd know that it's not required in my state.
nik
Ok, let's see if I got this straight.It's okay for the state to charge me a few bucks for a license. They do it for hunters. It helps bring revenue in to offset my taxes. Other people did it for me, I'll do it for them. My objection isn't the blood test requirement. My objection is the state deciding if I can marry or not based on health that may not even come into play during some people's marriage.
Originally posted by: tcsenter
Ok, let's see if I got this straight.It's okay for the state to charge me a few bucks for a license. They do it for hunters. It helps bring revenue in to offset my taxes. Other people did it for me, I'll do it for them. My objection isn't the blood test requirement. My objection is the state deciding if I can marry or not based on health that may not even come into play during some people's marriage.
It can tell you no for not throwing a couple bucks its way, and that's ok, but Holy Moses it damned well better not tell me no because it might save a life?
Ooooo K!
nik -Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
My objection isn't the blood test requirement. My objection is the state deciding if I can marry or not based on health that may not even come into play during some people's marriage.
nik
LOL...Originally posted by: BD2003
Maybe if you'd stop doing drugs, this wouldnt be a problem.
Originally posted by: BD2003
Maybe if you'd stop doing drugs, this wouldnt be a problem.
Originally posted by: Cyberian
nik -Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
My objection isn't the blood test requirement. My objection is the state deciding if I can marry or not based on health that may not even come into play during some people's marriage.
nik
Under what circumstances could the state decide that you can not marry?
Originally posted by: ScottyB
How would a blood test before marriage control syphillis? It's not like you can't have sex before marriage.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: ScottyB
How would a blood test before marriage control syphillis? It's not like you can't have sex before marriage.
Some people didn't know they had it, and if they did, sometimes they were two embarased/scared to tell their would be spouse. Nothing better as a wedding present to your would be spouce as a case of syhpillis. Who says that you are your partners first?
If you're going to say "no, you can't get married because if you have sex, your kids might look funny!" I'm going to look you straight in the face and tell you "they're MY kids, it's MY life, she's MY love, and I'll have them all just as I please!"
Not should, could.Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
Originally posted by: Cyberian
nik -Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
My objection isn't the blood test requirement. My objection is the state deciding if I can marry or not based on health that may not even come into play during some people's marriage.
nik
Under what circumstances could the state decide that you can not marry?
I don't believe that they should have any such authority at all.
nik
Under what circumstances could the state decide that you can not marry?
Originally posted by: CPA
I'd be worried about this:
Mississippi Marriage Requirements
Age
21 * (see below)
Cost of Marriage Certificate
$21.00
Waiting Period
3 Days
Valid For
3 Months
Identification Required
Yes
Blood Test Required
Yes
Residency Required
No
Other *
* If under age 21, a parental consent is required
Since when is a twenty year old a child that needs mommy's and daddy's permission?
This is becoming more and more rappent - classifying 19 and 20 and sometimes 21 year olds as teenagers or sometimes kids. It is mostly done in new articles, but now I see a state is using this philosophy in their marriage requirements.
Originally posted by: werk
BUT! BUT! BUT:
It is the government's job to protect society from itself.
nik