IceBergSLiM
Lifer
- Jul 11, 2000
- 29,933
- 3
- 81
There are still people out there willing to put their money where there mouth is. Probably not the best way to manifest his anger though.
You guys keep calling him a nutjob, he just took the grievances we all have and went too damn far.
Most of the gripes in his manifesto are the same we spew out here, left and right on a daily basis. Our system is fucked and this guy has had enough.
Yes, he's crazy for taking it to this level, for killing himself and for trying to kill others, but the roots of his unhappiness are present in all of us to varying degrees.
I know it's politically incorrect to "blame the other side", but isn't this the revolution that Teabaggers have been talking about?
from what i understand they been talking political revolution not flying planes into buildings...
While i am for change of the IRS code and hell goverment. anyone that holds this guy up as a hero is a fucking tard.
What about the blood watering the tree of liberty?
What about the blood watering the tree of liberty?
you contridict yoruself. you say he ain't a nutjob but say he is crazy for taking it to this level. hmm THIS IS WHY WE ARE CALLING HIM A NUTJOB.
When I type "Communist state", please read "states that self identify as Communist." This would include the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Laos in (I think) the 70s and early 80s. You seem to view Communism as something which has not yet reached its ideal, after which it would be glorious. But no state of any size could exist without some central tax collection and allocation. A self-governing commune simply can't grow large enough to generate and control the resources necessary to create and maintain a modern society. Imagine a few hundred thousand people trying on their own to build a highway or a factory to make penicillin - it simply can't be done without some sort of organization. Modern society requires specialization, and specialization inevitably breeds inequity. This inequity is good for society (to a point); it creates incentive to progress from the current state. But specialization shoots its wad pretty quickly if there is not a concentration of resources in some reliable form - not much use for a civil engineer if she must personally round up all the materials and labor to build a road. Therefore a Communist should appreciate the IRS as one step in the egalitarian process - although he could certainly sharply differ with its techniques and rules - and see his true issue is with those who make the rules of collection and distribution. A nut, however, goes after the thorn in his paw.Communist state is an oxymoron. A Communist populace is stateless and classless by definition. The fact that later "Communist" leaders imposed authoritarian governments upon their peoples in the name of "Communism" has done a huge dis-service to that area of political ideology. Communism was much closer to existing in Catalonia, Spain than the Soviet Union or China.
I would think a psychologist would diagnose him as having a severe mental problem.
When I type "Communist state", please read "states that self identify as Communist." This would include the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, Laos in (I think) the 70s and early 80s. You seem to view Communism as something which has not yet reached its ideal, after which it would be glorious. But no state of any size could exist without some central tax collection and allocation. A self-governing commune simply can't grow large enough to generate and control the resources necessary to create and maintain a modern society. Imagine a few hundred thousand people trying on their own to build a highway or a factory to make penicillin - it simply can't be done without some sort of organization. Modern society requires specialization, and specialization inevitably breeds inequity. This inequity is good for society (to a point); it creates incentive to progress from the current state. But specialization shoots its wad pretty quickly if there is not a concentration of resources in some reliable form - not much use for a civil engineer if she must personally round up all the materials and labor to build a road. Therefore a Communist should appreciate the IRS as one step in the egalitarian process - although he could certainly sharply differ with its techniques and rules - and see his true issue is with those who make the rules of collection and distribution. A nut, however, goes after the thorn in his paw.
This guy though seems to have been a good little capitalist who took some short cuts, got caught and punished, repeated, and finally snapped and turned Communist in his rage and madness and impotence. He's not an ideologue, just grasping at what he takes to be opposite to his perceived problem. His actual problem of course is himself and his inability to deal with the inevitable inequities in society in an efficient and useful manner. Verily, he is a nut.
only you guys would link this to Obama... Rush said so?
My Homer is not a Communist. He may be a liar, a pig, an idiot, a Communist, but he is not a porn star
I made no mention of the merits or plausibility of Communism. Communism is not so much about forcing the state to distribute resources as it is about people achieving what they can through association and not competition. So it doesn't do anything for me when you tell me that a Communist should embrace the IRS. A Communist would view the IRS as unnecessary in the Communist condition.
and finally snapped and turned Communist in his rage and madness and impotence. He's not an ideologue, just grasping at what he takes to be opposite to his perceived problem.
I don't see him turning to Communism less his use of a Marxist creed. He doesn't complain about anything that I haven't seen others here complain about, both on the left and right. If he had not included the final lines, would you still conclude he had turned to Communism?
So, do we call him a murderer or a patriot? Domestic terrorist?
Whatever you call it, it is more evidence...that it is all unraveling out there.
Good to hear that only the pilot died.
I guess one concern that we all should have is that someone, somewhere, will think he was doing the right thing, and attempt a similar act. To anyone so foolish, I can only say that this man attempted to take away the rights of people who he believed were trampling upon his own. So dies not only a murderer, but a hypocrite.
Crap, and I was about to send in my taxes for my return. How much longer am I going to have to wait now get get my return back?