Goosemaster
Lifer
- Apr 10, 2001
- 48,775
- 3
- 81
LOFL..that was great...you gotta make a thread about that
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
This turns the thread around nicely.
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
tHESE ARE PEOPLE'S OPINIONS!!!! WHY ARE PEOPLE GETTING BASHED FOR THEIR OPINIONS ON THINGS!?
(woops caps lock)
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: preslove
He's a moron for calling a company with rapidly expanding market share "very desperate." Why would they be desperate?
Dude you're a grade A asshole.
WTF makes your opinion any more important than his? He's commenting on the commercials, which I think 90% of the population knows are complete and utter Marketing BS and stupid. They don't give a fair fight and allow Windows to represent their product in similar light. But MS is smart and doesn't use FUD and mud slinging ad's (i.e. like some crappy wanna be congressman).
You call him a moron, but his post wasn't anything personal towards you. Guess what, YOU'RE the moron and asshole.
Your opinion means sh1t to everyone here but yourself.
OP, I agree. I hate the commercials. They are annoying. It has nothing to do with Apple as computer, but their marketing is crap.
But then again, I guess I'm a moron too! Anyone who has a difference of opinion is automatically a moron!
Kettle, meet pot.
This was just another mac bashing thread, and I'm sorry, I just find them annoying. That commercial was actually the first one in that campagin (which I don't like either) that presented a real advantage of macs over pc's. I know people who've dragged their laptops to the ground by tripping on the power cord. Sure it was their fault and stupid of them, but this feature would have prevented that.
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
Apple/Windows fights depress me.
Go away, preslove. The OP had a beef with Apple's advertising, not their software.
Troll.
This is a troll thread to begin with. How is apple desperate by highlighting a cool feature with their sh!tty add campaign?
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.
Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).
Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1
When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.
That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.
So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:
The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.
The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?
How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.
How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.
Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.
OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.
So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.
Says the person who has never used it.
EyeMWing is right. Just a fancier version of a Windows taskbar.Originally posted by: preslove
Says the person who has never used it.Originally posted by: EyeMWing
So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Commence Nested Quote Fight....NOW!
Oh wait, you already started...
Originally posted by: Insane3D
STFU you crazy crab!
![]()
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.
Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).
Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1
When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.
That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.
So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:
The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.
The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?
How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.
How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.
Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.
OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.
So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.
Says the person who has never used it.
I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.
If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.
Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).
Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1
When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.
That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.
So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:
The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.
The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?
How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.
How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.
Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.
OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.
So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.
Says the person who has never used it.
I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.
If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.
Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).
Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1
When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.
That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.
So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:
The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.
The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?
How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.
How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.
Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.
OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.
So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.
Says the person who has never used it.
I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.
If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.
*shrug* it's the best tool I've used for juggling programs, especially on a laptop. I find it superior to the task bar because it is easier to pick out the one microsoft office window I want to use out of the six I have open. If I'm using my dell laptop and I have 6 office windows, 2 excell windows 3 firefox windows, trillian, and winamp open, selecting between the five office or 3 firefox windows gets confusing because they're each so small on the task bar that they don't display enough text to show me what they are. Hit F9 and I easily see the window I want.
Trust me, there's a reason why anand said that the powerbook was the best notebook experience he had ever had (again, using an obsolete ibm processor when the intel chips were far superior).
Windows may be sufficient for your uses, but that doesn't mean that apple's focus on usability hasn't resulted in a better product.
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.
Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).
Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.
http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1
When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.
That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.
So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:
The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.
The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?
How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.
How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.
Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.
OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.
So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.
Says the person who has never used it.
I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.
If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.
*shrug* it's the best tool I've used for juggling programs, especially on a laptop. I find it superior to the task bar because it is easier to pick out the one microsoft office window I want to use out of the six I have open. If I'm using my dell laptop and I have 6 office windows, 2 excell windows 3 firefox windows, trillian, and winamp open, selecting between the five office or 3 firefox windows gets confusing because they're each so small on the task bar that they don't display enough text to show me what they are. Hit F9 and I easily see the window I want.
Trust me, there's a reason why anand said that the powerbook was the best notebook experience he had ever had (again, using an obsolete ibm processor when the intel chips were far superior).
Windows may be sufficient for your uses, but that doesn't mean that apple's focus on usability hasn't resulted in a better product.
I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.
If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.
*shrug* it's the best tool I've used for juggling programs, especially on a laptop. I find it superior to the task bar because it is easier to pick out the one microsoft office window I want to use out of the six I have open. If I'm using my dell laptop and I have 6 office windows, 2 excell windows 3 firefox windows, trillian, and winamp open, selecting between the five office or 3 firefox windows gets confusing because they're each so small on the task bar that they don't display enough text to show me what they are. Hit F9 and I easily see the window I want.
Taskbar->Right click->Properties->Group similar taskbar buttons.
Trust me, there's a reason why anand said that the powerbook was the best notebook experience he had ever had (again, using an obsolete ibm processor when the intel chips were far superior).
I generally don't appeal to authorities, so Anand's opinion on this matter doesn't mean much to me. I trust my opinion over his.
Windows may be sufficient for your uses, but that doesn't mean that apple's focus on usability hasn't resulted in a better product.
And sufficient for the overwhelming majority of non-casual business users.
You are correct though, it doesn't suggest that it hasn't resulted in a better product; of course, it doesn't suggest that it has, either. If tiny little things like this somehow result in a better product than I think Apple needs to try a little harder. I know there are other advantages to the Mac of course, so I understand this was just one example.
In the end, it's just a tool; use whatever fulfills the responsibility most effectively. I have a lot of requirements, so a feature like "get to your applications with a 2 clicks instead of 3" or something isn't worth any consideration.
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i agree... wtf puts a power cord in a spot where it can be easily tripped over? is apple suggesting that their product is for people who lack common sense?![]()
