Wow ... Apple must be getting very desperate

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0
All of the PC fanboys in here amaze me...and this fuckwad:

Then I used OSX, and IMMEDIATELY wrote the entire thing off as the most godawful interface I'd ever used. Because it is. I'd rather use Windows 3.1 than OSX.

Well, congrats, man. You're officially the first person I've ever heard say that Windows 3.1 and <OS9 are way better than OSX. Either you're a) just so much more enlightened than the rest of the world, or b) you don't have a fvcking clue what you're talking about, be it an opinion or not.

I'm a PC & Mac user, so I'm obviously a moron, so I won't try to figure out which one of the above is truely you...too complicated for mindless fanboys like me.
 

Toastedlightly

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2004
7,215
6
81
tHESE ARE PEOPLE'S OPINIONS!!!! WHY ARE PEOPLE GETTING BASHED FOR THEIR OPINIONS ON THINGS!?

(woops caps lock)
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
33,603
13,299
136
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
tHESE ARE PEOPLE'S OPINIONS!!!! WHY ARE PEOPLE GETTING BASHED FOR THEIR OPINIONS ON THINGS!?

(woops caps lock)

smooth move on the caps lock part ;)

everyone likes to think that their opinion is fact.

fact is, people have preferences - some people like barebones, business-style interface (windows) while others prefer a nicer, fresher looking GUI (OSX). i prefer the business style - wtf do i need a 3d accelerated desktop? i dont care if icons light up or bounce around when i click them, i just want the damn app to launch:)
 

LikeLinus

Lifer
Jul 25, 2001
11,518
670
126
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: LikeLinus
Originally posted by: preslove
He's a moron for calling a company with rapidly expanding market share "very desperate." Why would they be desperate?

Dude you're a grade A asshole.

WTF makes your opinion any more important than his? He's commenting on the commercials, which I think 90% of the population knows are complete and utter Marketing BS and stupid. They don't give a fair fight and allow Windows to represent their product in similar light. But MS is smart and doesn't use FUD and mud slinging ad's (i.e. like some crappy wanna be congressman).

You call him a moron, but his post wasn't anything personal towards you. Guess what, YOU'RE the moron and asshole.

Your opinion means sh1t to everyone here but yourself.


OP, I agree. I hate the commercials. They are annoying. It has nothing to do with Apple as computer, but their marketing is crap.

But then again, I guess I'm a moron too! Anyone who has a difference of opinion is automatically a moron!

Kettle, meet pot.

This was just another mac bashing thread, and I'm sorry, I just find them annoying. That commercial was actually the first one in that campagin (which I don't like either) that presented a real advantage of macs over pc's. I know people who've dragged their laptops to the ground by tripping on the power cord. Sure it was their fault and stupid of them, but this feature would have prevented that.

I'm not saying it's a bad feature. It's a neat feature, though it would make me buy a mac. The problem is their smear campaigns like this is a congressional race. But I remember when Apple was hurting and MS gave them $150 Million dollars. You don?t see them saying ?hey, thanks MS, you bailed us out!?

There are better ways to win audiences. Sell your product, not the shortcomings of others. Don?t spread FUD. That?s the number one reason why I dislike Apple. If your product is good, you should be able to sell it as such. It is a desperate and lousy way to sell a machine.

The OP is probably just fed up with hearing the FUD/BS. I know I hate it everytime they come on. Any class act company would never do that.
 

technophile82

Senior member
Jun 5, 2005
238
0
0
weeeeee! if you turn your head sideways, and scroll down the page quickly it looks like i'm going on a roller coaster ride!!! \o/
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: theprodigalrebel
Apple/Windows fights depress me.
Go away, preslove. The OP had a beef with Apple's advertising, not their software.

Troll.

This is a troll thread to begin with. How is apple desperate by highlighting a cool feature with their sh!tty add campaign?

Duh, you're a troll if you disagree with the general ATOT consensus. Didn't you get the memo?
 
S

SlitheryDee

Apple's not getting desperate. They're just continuing an ad campaign that has worked very well thusfar. I'm not sure, but I'd guess that they are doing better than ever before.

Not that I want a mac. I like to build my own computers and play current PC games. Can't do that on a mac so I use PCs. I never really understood this animosity that some people feel towards apple though. :confused:
 

Descartes

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
13,968
2
0
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.

Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).

Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.

http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1

When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.

That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.

So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:

The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.

The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.

Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?

How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.

How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.

Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.

OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.

So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.

Says the person who has never used it.

I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.

If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.
 

Aquaman

Lifer
Dec 17, 1999
25,054
13
0
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Commence Nested Quote Fight....NOW!

Oh wait, you already started...

In other news........... the Boston Bruins have been sold and are moving to NY City and will be renamed the Brooklyn Ice Yankees ;)

Cheers,
Aquaman
 

postmortemIA

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2006
7,721
40
91
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.

Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).

Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.

http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1

When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.

That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.

So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:

The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.

The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.

Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?

How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.

How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.

Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.

OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.

So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.

Says the person who has never used it.

I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.

If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.


this post rox on widescreen
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
64
91
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.

Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).

Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.

http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1

When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.

That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.

So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:

The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.

The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.

Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?

How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.

How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.

Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.

OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.

So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.

Says the person who has never used it.

I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.

If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.

*shrug* it's the best tool I've used for juggling programs, especially on a laptop. I find it superior to the task bar because it is easier to pick out the one microsoft office window I want to use out of the six I have open. If I'm using my dell laptop and I have 6 office windows, 2 excell windows 3 firefox windows, trillian, and winamp open, selecting between the five office or 3 firefox windows gets confusing because they're each so small on the task bar that they don't display enough text to show me what they are. Hit F9 and I easily see the window I want.

Trust me, there's a reason why anand said that the powerbook was the best notebook experience he had ever had (again, using an obsolete ibm processor when the intel chips were far superior).

Windows may be sufficient for your uses, but that doesn't mean that apple's focus on usability hasn't resulted in a better product.
 

Toastedlightly

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2004
7,215
6
81
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.

Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).

Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.

http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1

When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.

That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.

So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:

The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.

The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.

Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?

How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.

How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.

Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.

OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.

So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.

Says the person who has never used it.

I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.

If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.

*shrug* it's the best tool I've used for juggling programs, especially on a laptop. I find it superior to the task bar because it is easier to pick out the one microsoft office window I want to use out of the six I have open. If I'm using my dell laptop and I have 6 office windows, 2 excell windows 3 firefox windows, trillian, and winamp open, selecting between the five office or 3 firefox windows gets confusing because they're each so small on the task bar that they don't display enough text to show me what they are. Hit F9 and I easily see the window I want.

Trust me, there's a reason why anand said that the powerbook was the best notebook experience he had ever had (again, using an obsolete ibm processor when the intel chips were far superior).

Windows may be sufficient for your uses, but that doesn't mean that apple's focus on usability hasn't resulted in a better product.


W00t I get to participate it the endless quoting!

What's good for the goose isn't always good for the gander. Congrats that you like Macs so much, but not everyone has the same exact needs, and a PC may do them more justice.
 

Descartes

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
13,968
2
0
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Descartes
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: EyeMWing
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: MrPickins
Originally posted by: preslove
Originally posted by: Babbles
I get entertained when Mac Fanboys (e.g. preslove) clueless try to argue that every little thing Apple does is the best thing ever.

Oh, and "preslove" before you accuse others of reading comprehension problems, you may want to make sure that you do not have the same issue as well (see your last post where you quoted Anand using the phrase "in my opinion" - just think about that one for a while).

Um... I put the opinion of Anand way above any of the mac bashers in this thread. Most of them have never even used a new mac and have no idea what they are talking about. I'm not a fan boy, mac's have their problems, too, but the interface and the small touches make it a better experience.

http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2740&p=1

When I first started using a PowerBook G4 over a year ago it quickly turned into the best experience I'd ever had with a notebook.

That was using an obsolete, POS, ibm chip. And it was a better experience for him than any other notebook pc using superior hardware.

So, Is Anand a freaking fanboy, too? :roll:

The difference is that Anand realizes the difference between fact and opinion.

The reasons for his high opinion of the mac's user interface are facts. OSX gives end user more and easier options for getting around in the os.
Easier, if you define it scientifically as in net-feature-per-finger-per-keystroke, Windows wins hands-down. But easier is generally a QUALITATIVE measurement, and totally opinion-based. "More" options - no. It doesn't. They both give you 3. GUI, GUI + Keystrokes, Command Line.

Have you used expose? Have you used it with 8 different programs running in 20 different windows and compared it to using windows xp with the same number of programs/windows running?

How's about you tell me WHAT THE FVCK IT IS, since a few posts back I admitted to not knowing.

How the fvck can you comment on the user interface of OSX when you don't know the best way to move around in it. YOU HIT F9 AND ALL THE WINDOWS POP UP AT YOU SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE WINDOW YOU WANT TO BRING TO THE FRONT. Hit F10 and it will bring up all the windows of the program you're working on to the front so you can click on them. Click F11 and it shows the desk top (this is of course can be accomplished in windows easily). Maybe you shouldn't comment on things about which you know nothing.

Because Expose wasn't around the last time I used the damn thing, and by that description, it sounds like a highly animated version of Alt-Tab and taskbar grouping - if you need to see what's in each window visually, you're beyond your threshold for efficient multitasking.

OSX has alt tab in the form of command tab. Expose is far superior and much faster. All the windows come up on the screen so you see all of them at once then you just click on the window you want. One keyboard button and one mouse click. With alt tab you have to cycle through all the windows and in my experience is a pain in the ass that I use only when I have a slow down or program crash. I use expose constantly.

So, it serves the same purpose as the Windows taskbar, except you have to press a button to bring it up. Excellent.

Says the person who has never used it.

I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.

If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.

*shrug* it's the best tool I've used for juggling programs, especially on a laptop. I find it superior to the task bar because it is easier to pick out the one microsoft office window I want to use out of the six I have open. If I'm using my dell laptop and I have 6 office windows, 2 excell windows 3 firefox windows, trillian, and winamp open, selecting between the five office or 3 firefox windows gets confusing because they're each so small on the task bar that they don't display enough text to show me what they are. Hit F9 and I easily see the window I want.

Taskbar->Right click->Properties->Group similar taskbar buttons.

Click on the application you want and you get the full taskbar description. Choose the one you want. This is two mouse clicks; no more than your F9+mouse click, and, in my opinion, more efficient as it doesn't require a keyboard interaction as well.

Trust me, there's a reason why anand said that the powerbook was the best notebook experience he had ever had (again, using an obsolete ibm processor when the intel chips were far superior).

I generally don't appeal to authorities, so Anand's opinion on this matter doesn't mean much to me. I trust my opinion over his.

Windows may be sufficient for your uses, but that doesn't mean that apple's focus on usability hasn't resulted in a better product.

And sufficient for the overwhelming majority of non-casual business users.

You are correct though, it doesn't suggest that it hasn't resulted in a better product; of course, it doesn't suggest that it has, either. If tiny little things like this somehow result in a better product than I think Apple needs to try a little harder. I know there are other advantages to the Mac of course, so I understand this was just one example.

In the end, it's just a tool; use whatever fulfills the responsibility most effectively. I have a lot of requirements, so a feature like "get to your applications with a 2 clicks instead of 3" or something isn't worth any consideration.
 

preslove

Lifer
Sep 10, 2003
16,754
64
91
I frequently have more than 8 applications running at once, many with multiple instances, and can't say I've ever felt like I needed a more efficient way of getting to them. A combination of the taskbar, alt+tab, task manager, etc. are more than sufficient.

If this tiny little feature you mention is somehow supposed to be a selling point, I'm not seeing it. I could write an application to do the very same thing in a matter of hours, but it's not needed.

*shrug* it's the best tool I've used for juggling programs, especially on a laptop. I find it superior to the task bar because it is easier to pick out the one microsoft office window I want to use out of the six I have open. If I'm using my dell laptop and I have 6 office windows, 2 excell windows 3 firefox windows, trillian, and winamp open, selecting between the five office or 3 firefox windows gets confusing because they're each so small on the task bar that they don't display enough text to show me what they are. Hit F9 and I easily see the window I want.

Taskbar->Right click->Properties->Group similar taskbar buttons.


I dislike grouped taskbars. In my experience they impede my productivity, rather than improve it.


Trust me, there's a reason why anand said that the powerbook was the best notebook experience he had ever had (again, using an obsolete ibm processor when the intel chips were far superior).

I generally don't appeal to authorities, so Anand's opinion on this matter doesn't mean much to me. I trust my opinion over his.

I inferred from your previous post that you haven't used OSX for any length of time. If that's true then you are arguing from ignorance and not trusting your own opinion. I hope I'm wrong because I generally trust your opinions

I trust anand's judgement and his opinion was one factor in my decision to buy a macbook. I used him in this thread because he has never shown himself to be a fanboy and is generally considered unbiased.




Windows may be sufficient for your uses, but that doesn't mean that apple's focus on usability hasn't resulted in a better product.

And sufficient for the overwhelming majority of non-casual business users.


Apple ceded the business sector long ago (they don't even have docking stations on their laptops). The market forces that that have led to pc domination of the business sector are manifold and would take much bigger nested quotes to get into. Suffice it to say that the productivity gains of switching to apple hardware would pale in comparison to the expenses incurred by switching. It just doesn't make sense for large organizations to switch to apple just because it's interface is better.



You are correct though, it doesn't suggest that it hasn't resulted in a better product; of course, it doesn't suggest that it has, either. If tiny little things like this somehow result in a better product than I think Apple needs to try a little harder. I know there are other advantages to the Mac of course, so I understand this was just one example.

What most peole fail to realize is that apple doesn't want to replace microsoft. It wants to grab more market share (what business doesn't?), but its business model is to provide a luxury product at luxury prices that earn it a much high profit margin than its cheaper peers.


In the end, it's just a tool; use whatever fulfills the responsibility most effectively. I have a lot of requirements, so a feature like "get to your applications with a 2 clicks instead of 3" or something isn't worth any consideration.

It is only one example, but, again, it sounds to me that you're arguing out of ignorance. Buy a mini and get back to me :p
 

Insane3D

Elite Member
May 24, 2000
19,446
0
0
You guys are arguing about this crap, but you can't just reply without posting the whole conversation over and over?

:roll:
 

TheStu

Moderator<br>Mobile Devices & Gadgets
Moderator
Sep 15, 2004
12,089
45
91
I have been a PC user for years (when I say PC I mean windows boxes, never could get linux to work correctly for me [and yes I did seek assistance, and no one I asked could solve the problems either]) but got myself a macbook this summer for school. After a good deal of research it ended up being the best deal in terms of what I was getting, and the dual-booting option was nice as well. I have found in the past month or so however that i use OSX significantly more that I use Windows. On my desk right now I have my macbook and an alienware sentia (got it through a trade) and although they are both roughly the same machine (the macbook is dual core with a larger hard drive) I honestly find my experience better in OS X. Things that I have always had available to me in one form or another in windows are still available to me in OS X, but I use them in OS X and never did in Windows. For instance, I had that ability to run multiple desktops in Windows, and did for a short amount of time, but never really latched onto it since it always seemed wicked sluggish to switch, and this was on my desktop with a 6800 and a gig of ram. VirtueDesktops for OS X is an awesome program that I used incessantly. It may be the smaller screen of the laptop (but really I dont have that much less screen real estate compared to my 17" CRT) but i just find that it is a much more utilized thing now.

I don't necessarily run more apps in OS X than i did in windows, but I do find expose to be a more elegant and easy to use solution than alt-tab and the task-bar. I honestly did not know about the command-tab key, but I don't really see myself using it that much.

I like the fact that if Finder (OS X's Explorer for those that needed that information) ever does decide to take a sh!t, I can relaunch it with next to no penalty, and it comes back up very quickly. Admittedly Windows XP does a much better job at bringing back explorer than the earlier Windows ever did (save for perhaps Windows 2000, but I haven't run that in ages) but the fact that windows doesnt offer an option to restart explorer is kind of bogus. What I mean by that is that the user can end the process, but then explorer is down, and you have to start the process back up manually (unless someone knows a shortcut around this, in which I shall sit corrected)

I find that all in all I am more efficient in OS X than I ever was in Windows, and the UI is what makes that possible. Are there things that I miss from Windows? Absolutely. But would I regret going back to it? Of course I would, I enjoy OS X a little too much.


However, back to the OP's point. I do find that ad in particular to be silly, especially considering that yes, the power connector does come out more easily than anything else if you pull it in a direction non-parallel to the way it plugs in... but if you pull it straight out from the connector... then it is so solidly stuck in there that I have literally pulled my laptop across my desk by the connector. This is really not that much different from most other connectors, but when they tout this as some sort of easy release connector, but then it holds so tight in one direction that you could swing the d@mn thing around your head, I think the point gets a little skewed.

The ads are silly though. They praise macs as being more secure than PCs (true) virus-free (not-true, there have been a couple of stories about viruses hitting OS X... the problem is that hte writers of said viruses were less than script-kiddies, and in order to get infected by these viruses required the user to be stupid to the extreme) and all around the saviors of hte computing world (not necessarily true)

I will say this much though, the OS has a built-in spell checker that works in browser... and that is a nice little feature.
 

LtPage1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2004
6,311
2
0
Originally posted by: Fenixgoon
i agree... wtf puts a power cord in a spot where it can be easily tripped over? is apple suggesting that their product is for people who lack common sense? ;):D

Clearly, you've never met the average computer user. EVERY computer product is for people who lack common sense.

Anyways, Apple's current OS has always been 2-3 years ahead of the latest Windows release. Vista is a prettified XP with a bunch of features ripped directly from 2005's OS X 10.4.

Regardless of your OS preference, to argue that Apple's is less advanced than Windows, is just idiotic.