Wisconsin GOP aims to bypass state electoral commission

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,834
33,464
136
dont you ever get tired with the race bullshit? you are what is wrong with this country.
What's wrong with this country is Republicans gerrymandering their way to apartheid. You should be concerned about that.

Galveston county TX just eliminated their last minority represented district with the stoke of a pen. You should be concerned about that.

A 10 year old girl in Utah killed herself due to racial bullying. The parents complained to teachers and administrators and were ignored. DOJ a few week prior issued a study Utah districts were ignoring racism in their midst. I guess they were too busy looking for that non existent CRT to care.

That is what is really wrong with this country yet you want to focus on my anger? Go fuck yourself.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,454
24,679
136
What's wrong with this country is Republicans gerrymandering their way to apartheid. You should be concerned about that.

Galveston county TX just eliminated their last minority represented district with the stoke of a pen. You should be concerned about that.

A 10 year old girl in Utah killed herself due to racial bullying. The parents complained to teachers and administrators and were ignored. DOJ a few week prior issued a study Utah districts were ignoring racism in their midst. I guess they were too busy looking for that non existent CRT to care.

That is what is really wrong with this country yet you want to focus on my anger? Go fuck yourself.
The Republican party is evil. There is no if ands or buts about it. They are well on their way to becoming as horrific as the fascists of Europe, the stalinists of Russia or the maoists of China.
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,087
8,682
136
The Republican party is evil. There is no if ands or buts about it. They are well on their way to becoming as horrific as the fascists of Europe, the stalinists of Russia or the maoists of China.


Where the Repub party is heading, things can only get worse for the nation. In the self-induced manic panicked state of mind they're in, there is nothing they won't try and do to permanently gain control of the nation and Trump gave them all the criminally infected tools they needed to make it happen.
 

KMFJD

Lifer
Aug 11, 2005
33,695
54,130
136
rgaBnEh.jpg


exact same playbook being used for 'election fraud'
 

Ajay

Lifer
Jan 8, 2001
16,094
8,115
136
So one would predict 20% of their representatives to be something other than Caucasian. I haven't looked, but I have my suspicions.
Well, because I was being lazy, I left off the horrible gerrymandering prevalent in most states. The GOP made a very serious and concerted effort to win majorities in state house and state senate chambers - the democrats were too slow to respond so reversing this will be a bitch. We are likely stuck with the current state of affairs for a long time to come.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,693
10,425
136
So if I understand SCOTUS correctly, they're saying the lower court in Wisconsin did not adequately consider applicability of the Voting Rights Act to the governor's proposed maps. The same VRA that they've refused to enforce and allowed states to gut is now suddenly invoked in a Hail Mary by Republicans and BOOM...maps denied??? Interesting...
 

Dave_5k

Platinum Member
May 23, 2017
2,007
3,820
136
I think this Court would find a re-imposition of selective poll taxes to be perfectly fine and dandy proposition, just as long as they were labelled a "fee" rather than a tax.

Might as well have this 6 person Divine Supreme Court-Legislature take over the rest of the federal budget & directly coordinate with the Joint Chiefs.

I mean, they already rewrite domestic policy, foreign policy, and the nations laws into the vision of their gods ~ might as well go all the way.
 

Dave_5k

Platinum Member
May 23, 2017
2,007
3,820
136
So if I understand SCOTUS correctly, they're saying the lower court in Wisconsin did not adequately consider applicability of the Voting Rights Act to the governor's proposed maps. The same VRA that they've refused to enforce and allowed states to gut is now suddenly invoked in a Hail Mary by Republicans and BOOM...maps denied??? Interesting...
I read it, the error was in that they contemplated implications of the actual text of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) when framing final maps. It was not that they were ignoring the VRA, instead, were actually following the clear text and intent of the VRA - which has been found now to be immediately reversible without hearing.

Even considering the plain language of the VRA when forming maps is now presumptively illegal, according to this Court. Which follows as an extension from their prior rulings finding almost all of the VRA to null and void.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,693
10,425
136
I read it, the error was in that they contemplated implications of the actual text of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) when framing final maps. It was not that they were ignoring the VRA, instead, were actually following the clear text and intent of the VRA - which has been found now to be immediately reversible without hearing.

Even considering the plain language of the VRA when forming maps is now presumptively illegal, according to this Court. Which follows as an extension from their prior rulings finding almost all of the VRA to null and void.

That's even more ridiculous than the argument I thought they were making.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
30,238
31,276
136
And justices get defensive when people question the legitimacy of this court. A fucking ruling on the merits without argument that further guts the VRA. Of course this is the same court that has flat out refused to enforce its own precedent while litigation is underway in the Texas abortion case. I wasn't a fan of court packing before but if the possibility presents itself it might be the only way.

Also Wisconsin is an insanely gerrymandered state where the GOP gets a supermajority of seats by losing the statewide popular vote. If that doesn't call into question the legitimacy of a democracy I don't know what does.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,699
48,317
136
I read it, the error was in that they contemplated implications of the actual text of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) when framing final maps. It was not that they were ignoring the VRA, instead, were actually following the clear text and intent of the VRA - which has been found now to be immediately reversible without hearing.

Even considering the plain language of the VRA when forming maps is now presumptively illegal, according to this Court. Which follows as an extension from their prior rulings finding almost all of the VRA to null and void.

The conservative court's total disdain for the VRA and their dismantling it piece by piece has for some time made me think whatever the Senate could ever pass to protect voting rights, prevent political gerrymandering, etc is worthless because a hard right SCOTUS will just go:

Unknown.jpeg
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,530
16,864
146
I read it, the error was in that they contemplated implications of the actual text of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) when framing final maps. It was not that they were ignoring the VRA, instead, were actually following the clear text and intent of the VRA - which has been found now to be immediately reversible without hearing.
Talk about wagging the dog.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,236
55,791
136
Calvinball continues from the SCOTUS.
My favorite part is when they denied a Democratic lawsuit about Alabama potentially committing a VRA violation in January, saying it was too close to the election, only in March to decide that two months later in March there’s plenty of time to fix a potential Democratic VRA violation.

Expand the court.
 

Paratus

Lifer
Jun 4, 2004
17,745
16,062
146
I think this Court would find a re-imposition of selective poll taxes to be perfectly fine and dandy proposition, just as long as they were labelled a "fee" rather than a tax.

Might as well have this 6 person Divine Supreme Court-Legislature take over the rest of the federal budget & directly coordinate with the Joint Chiefs.

I mean, they already rewrite domestic policy, foreign policy, and the nations laws into the vision of their gods ~ might as well go all the way.
Why should they coordinate with Joint Chiefs or even do it themselves - just let their underlings control our military:



If you don't want to follow orders just find a conservative judge to overturn them.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,693
10,425
136
Why should they coordinate with Joint Chiefs or even do it themselves - just let their underlings control our military:



If you don't want to follow orders just find a conservative judge to overturn them.

Jesus Fucking Christ. Based on this ruling, a US military officer can refuse orders, and even deceive higher-ups about whether those orders have been followed, as long as they're following a "mission from God".

This country be fucked.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,699
48,317
136
Jesus Fucking Christ. Based on this ruling, a US military officer can refuse orders, and even deceive higher-ups about whether those orders have been followed, as long as they're following a "mission from God".

This country be fucked.

I don't think absolute deference to religious people in any and all matters above all other concerns is exactly what was intended in the bill of rights.