Will you make the list?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Boycotts are often ineffective or have unintended consequences, and blacklisting people is no different than McCarthyism. Ideologues from both parties like to play the boycott game, and yet Hobby Lobby and Chik-fil-A somehow manage to survive.

Wait... so people deciding where or where not to spend their own monies is the same as McCarthyism?
Get the fuck out of here..
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,405
19,783
146
I have a Disney+ account, frequent their theme parks and prefer Nike for most of my athletic attire needs...your point?

This isn't about you. This is about the side you represent here crying about boycotts when they themselves have led thousands of them.

Snowflakes gotta snowflake I guess.

The free market rejecting someone is only good if it's for your side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Says the guy who reps the party who has boycotted everything from Disney to Nike.

OK.
The other day I was perusing FB just for the hell of it, and I ran across some clown ranting about how 'punitive' liberals were to anyone with a differing opinion. So I click on his profile, which was wide open BTW, and see nothing but Franklin Graham and posts about how everything LGBTQ should be made illegal.
This is the level of hypocrite we're dealing with here.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,405
19,783
146
The other day I was perusing FB just for the hell of it, and I ran across some clown ranting about how 'punitive' liberals were to anyone with a differing opinion. So I click on his profile, which was wide open BTW, and see nothing but Franklin Graham and posts about how everything LGBTQ should be made illegal.
This is the level of hypocrite we're dealing with here.

Exactly my point.
 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
This isn't about you. This is about the side you represent here crying about boycotts when they themselves have led thousands of them.

Snowflakes gotta snowflake I guess.

The free market rejecting someone is only good if it's for your side.
How am I representing a side if I reject their call to boycott products from the companies that offend them?
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,405
19,783
146
How am I representing a side if I reject their call to boycott products from the companies that offend them?

Sigh.

This isn't about you.

Answer this question: Do you believe in freedom of association?
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,877
136
The other day I was perusing FB

This is the level of hypocrite we're dealing with here


That was your first mistake lol ... I literally had to stop reading most Trumper-posts in order to preserve a few shreds of my sanity.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,884
4,993
136
What about those who quit and blew the whistle on Trump?



Certainly their efforts should be recognized.

a2bd69fc-d875-4de2-a512-d33742091be0.jpeg
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,021
55,485
136
It’s kind of awesome that conservatives here are angry about people engaging in free speech on the grounds that this free speech is inhibiting free speech.

lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54 and Pohemi

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,021
55,485
136
business can refuse service to anyone, that's my stance.

i do belive that you are getting your bothsides mixed up. the people who said you cant refuse service to the gay couple are the ones saying you can refuse service to the maga hat.

the libertarians just say you can refuse service to both because its your business. and they can refuse to use your business, and their friends. the market fixes the problem when the cake place down the street takes all the business because they are not idiots refusing service to people.
Right, but the law on this is very clear in states where refusing service on sexual orientation is illegal.

1) you can’t deny based on orientation, so you must serve gay people.
2) you can deny based on political ideology, so you may deny the MAGA idiot.

If you want to change the law that’s fine but it’s not like people who are saying we should follow the law are being inconsistent. Also, is this really surprising that we don’t have laws that force black people to serve KKK members?
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
Oh gee. I guess freedom of association, private property rights and economic freedom only count of they work in your favor, right?

It's a boycott. Should have started years ago against anyone who enabled him or financed him.

It is not an official government blocklist. It is a PRIVATE boycott. You cannot stop a private boycott without limiting FREEDOM.
A current member of Congress is reminding people not to forget her political enemies and using twitter.

 

Starbuck1975

Lifer
Jan 6, 2005
14,698
1,909
126
Sigh.

This isn't about you.

Answer this question: Do you believe in freedom of association?
I believe in freedom of association. It is inappropriate for elected politicians to express support for the creation of lists to punish American citizens for the political groups they choose to associate with. Similarly, we will see how committed some are to the concept of association once police unions start pushing back on the inevitable reforms that will emerge under a Biden administration. This is all just more tribalistic noise and nonsense.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,983
30,878
136
A current member of Congress is reminding people not to forget her political enemies.

Besides the click bait headline, what specifically did she say including the context?

You've linked to a website run by a guy who hyped the whole Biden Ukraine story and has a history of unethical behavior in journalism. Forgive me for not just taking your word that the article is accurate.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
Besides the click bait headline, what specifically did she say including the context?

You've linked to a website run by a guy who hyped the whole Biden Ukraine story and has a history of unethical behavior in journalism. Forgive me for not just taking your word that the article is accurate.
Since you spent so much time trying to discredit the site and not actually addressing a problem because that's the easy way to address a perplexing problem.. I extracted the tweet, you know the thing from twitter, from the link and it reads "Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future". I guess AOC is taking a poll to see what the temperature of the room is or maybe just asking for a friend? Had Trump said that, we would have had 1000000 replies of "dog whistle". Several guest contributors and members of the "free press" are waiting to destroy and delete anyone that didn't agree politically or ideology with the Church of the Progressheviks. Sounds like the precursor for an authoritarian regime.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,983
30,878
136
Since you spent so much time trying to discredit the site and not actually addressing a problem because that's the easy way to address a perplexing problem.. I extracted the tweet, you know the thing from twitter, from the link and it reads "Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future". I guess AOC is taking a poll to see what the temperature of the room is or maybe just asking for a friend? Had Trump said that, we would have had 1000000 replies of "dog whistle". Several guest contributors and members of the "free press" are waiting to destroy and delete anyone that didn't agree politically or ideology with the Church of the Progressheviks. Sounds like the precursor for an authoritarian regime.

Did you forget that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences for what you say? Is she proposing using the power of the government to do this? If so that would be an actual problem.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,405
19,783
146
Did you forget that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences for what you say? She is proposing using the power of the government to do this? If so that would be an actual problem.

This is where they always lose the plot.

NO ONE IS CALLING FOR GOVERNMENT OR LEGAL ACTION.

Only for people to use the freedom of association, private property and economic freedom to NOT associate with people who have sought to undermine American Democracy.

I guess freedom is bad when people use it to tell you to fuck off, huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi and hal2kilo

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,868
10,177
136
So people exercising their own freedoms by choosing where or where not to spend their own hard-earned monies are going to be the cause of the next civil war?

Hating on and acting against half the nation. Or at the very least 70+ million voters plus their dependents.
Yes. Attempting to segregate a nation has consequences. And it sure as hell will not help in winning over votes.

I guess freedom is bad when people use it to tell you to fuck off, huh?

The South exercised their freedom to secede from the Union.
You are advocating an equivalent division, are you not?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,405
19,783
146
Hating on and acting against half the nation. Or at the very least 70+ million voters plus their dependents.
Yes. Attempting to segregate a nation has consequences. And it sure as hell will not help in winning over votes.

Reading comprehension is hard, isn't it???


We should welcome in our fellow Americans with whom we differ politically.

But those who took a paycheck from the Trump Administration should not profit from their efforts to tear our democracy apart. The world should never forget those who, when faced with a decision, chose to put their money, their time, and their reputations behind separating children from their families, encouraging racism and anti-Semitism, and negligently causing the unnecessary loss of life and economic devastation from our country's failed response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Since you spent so much time trying to discredit the site and not actually addressing a problem because that's the easy way to address a perplexing problem.. I extracted the tweet, you know the thing from twitter, from the link and it reads "Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future". I guess AOC is taking a poll to see what the temperature of the room is or maybe just asking for a friend? Had Trump said that, we would have had 1000000 replies of "dog whistle". Several guest contributors and members of the "free press" are waiting to destroy and delete anyone that didn't agree politically or ideology with the Church of the Progressheviks. Sounds like the precursor for an authoritarian regime.

How is any of that different from what you would do if given the chance? I mean, you don't seem to have any issues with all the Trumpers calling for shooting or beheading 'Progressheviks' because they disagree with their speech, but if some 'Progresshevik' doesn't want to spend their money at a business that supported having them shot or beheaded for their speech, that's 'the precursor for an authoritarian regime?' Seriously?
 
  • Like
Reactions: obidamnkenobi

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,884
4,993
136
Their better be some recognition of service to the country for Col. Vindman.

Of course.

I was referring to former Trumpsters who finally saw the light and then denounced him...They don't deserve special recognition for simply doing the right thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,175
12,372
136
Hating on and acting against half the nation. Or at the very least 70+ million voters plus their dependents.
Yes. Attempting to segregate a nation has consequences. And it sure as hell will not help in winning over votes.



The South exercised their freedom to secede from the Union.
You are advocating an equivalent division, are you not?
They still haven't apologized.