Starbuck1975
Lifer
I have a Disney+ account, frequent their theme parks and prefer Nike for most of my athletic attire needs...your point?Says the guy who reps the party who has boycotted everything from Disney to Nike.
OK.
I have a Disney+ account, frequent their theme parks and prefer Nike for most of my athletic attire needs...your point?Says the guy who reps the party who has boycotted everything from Disney to Nike.
OK.
Boycotts are often ineffective or have unintended consequences, and blacklisting people is no different than McCarthyism. Ideologues from both parties like to play the boycott game, and yet Hobby Lobby and Chik-fil-A somehow manage to survive.
I have a Disney+ account, frequent their theme parks and prefer Nike for most of my athletic attire needs...your point?
The other day I was perusing FB just for the hell of it, and I ran across some clown ranting about how 'punitive' liberals were to anyone with a differing opinion. So I click on his profile, which was wide open BTW, and see nothing but Franklin Graham and posts about how everything LGBTQ should be made illegal.Says the guy who reps the party who has boycotted everything from Disney to Nike.
OK.
The other day I was perusing FB just for the hell of it, and I ran across some clown ranting about how 'punitive' liberals were to anyone with a differing opinion. So I click on his profile, which was wide open BTW, and see nothing but Franklin Graham and posts about how everything LGBTQ should be made illegal.
This is the level of hypocrite we're dealing with here.
How am I representing a side if I reject their call to boycott products from the companies that offend them?This isn't about you. This is about the side you represent here crying about boycotts when they themselves have led thousands of them.
Snowflakes gotta snowflake I guess.
The free market rejecting someone is only good if it's for your side.
Still hiding from the Portland thread, lolWait... so people deciding where or where not to spend their own monies is the same as McCarthyism?
Get the fuck out of here..
How am I representing a side if I reject their call to boycott products from the companies that offend them?
The other day I was perusing FB
This is the level of hypocrite we're dealing with here
What about those who quit and blew the whistle on Trump?
Their better be some recognition of service to the country for Col. Vindman.Certainly their efforts should be recognized.
![]()
Right, but the law on this is very clear in states where refusing service on sexual orientation is illegal.business can refuse service to anyone, that's my stance.
i do belive that you are getting your bothsides mixed up. the people who said you cant refuse service to the gay couple are the ones saying you can refuse service to the maga hat.
the libertarians just say you can refuse service to both because its your business. and they can refuse to use your business, and their friends. the market fixes the problem when the cake place down the street takes all the business because they are not idiots refusing service to people.
A current member of Congress is reminding people not to forget her political enemies and using twitter.Oh gee. I guess freedom of association, private property rights and economic freedom only count of they work in your favor, right?
It's a boycott. Should have started years ago against anyone who enabled him or financed him.
It is not an official government blocklist. It is a PRIVATE boycott. You cannot stop a private boycott without limiting FREEDOM.
I believe in freedom of association. It is inappropriate for elected politicians to express support for the creation of lists to punish American citizens for the political groups they choose to associate with. Similarly, we will see how committed some are to the concept of association once police unions start pushing back on the inevitable reforms that will emerge under a Biden administration. This is all just more tribalistic noise and nonsense.Sigh.
This isn't about you.
Answer this question: Do you believe in freedom of association?
Besides the click bait headline, what specifically did she say including the context?A current member of Congress is reminding people not to forget her political enemies.
![]()
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, activists hint at blacklisting of Trump supporters after election
Dem congresswoman suggests holding them ‘responsible for their behavior’justthenews.com
Since you spent so much time trying to discredit the site and not actually addressing a problem because that's the easy way to address a perplexing problem.. I extracted the tweet, you know the thing from twitter, from the link and it reads "Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future". I guess AOC is taking a poll to see what the temperature of the room is or maybe just asking for a friend? Had Trump said that, we would have had 1000000 replies of "dog whistle". Several guest contributors and members of the "free press" are waiting to destroy and delete anyone that didn't agree politically or ideology with the Church of the Progressheviks. Sounds like the precursor for an authoritarian regime.Besides the click bait headline, what specifically did she say including the context?
You've linked to a website run by a guy who hyped the whole Biden Ukraine story and has a history of unethical behavior in journalism. Forgive me for not just taking your word that the article is accurate.
Since you spent so much time trying to discredit the site and not actually addressing a problem because that's the easy way to address a perplexing problem.. I extracted the tweet, you know the thing from twitter, from the link and it reads "Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future". I guess AOC is taking a poll to see what the temperature of the room is or maybe just asking for a friend? Had Trump said that, we would have had 1000000 replies of "dog whistle". Several guest contributors and members of the "free press" are waiting to destroy and delete anyone that didn't agree politically or ideology with the Church of the Progressheviks. Sounds like the precursor for an authoritarian regime.
Did you forget that freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences for what you say? She is proposing using the power of the government to do this? If so that would be an actual problem.
So people exercising their own freedoms by choosing where or where not to spend their own hard-earned monies are going to be the cause of the next civil war?
I guess freedom is bad when people use it to tell you to fuck off, huh?
Hating on and acting against half the nation. Or at the very least 70+ million voters plus their dependents.
Yes. Attempting to segregate a nation has consequences. And it sure as hell will not help in winning over votes.
Since you spent so much time trying to discredit the site and not actually addressing a problem because that's the easy way to address a perplexing problem.. I extracted the tweet, you know the thing from twitter, from the link and it reads "Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future". I guess AOC is taking a poll to see what the temperature of the room is or maybe just asking for a friend? Had Trump said that, we would have had 1000000 replies of "dog whistle". Several guest contributors and members of the "free press" are waiting to destroy and delete anyone that didn't agree politically or ideology with the Church of the Progressheviks. Sounds like the precursor for an authoritarian regime.
Their better be some recognition of service to the country for Col. Vindman.
They still haven't apologized.Hating on and acting against half the nation. Or at the very least 70+ million voters plus their dependents.
Yes. Attempting to segregate a nation has consequences. And it sure as hell will not help in winning over votes.
The South exercised their freedom to secede from the Union.
You are advocating an equivalent division, are you not?