So let me ask you again, are you going to continue using the national origin of story's source as reason to disregard the content? Come on, this isn't some completely out of left field and outrageous charge that has never been spoken before. Assange is basically telling us what we already know - Hillary Clinton used a private email server to avoid scrutiny of her official actions as Secretary of State because a paper trail might negatively impact her future political ambitions. Then when this was discovered she suddenly developed a case of the "I do not recalls" and "I didn't knows" to avoid incriminating herself. It's the same scenario as the "it depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is" sorta bullsh!tting that her husband did when he got caught. And like him people wouldn't have given much of a sh!t about what they did, but then they lied about it and they got dragged down by covering up the lie for months and years afterwards.
Come on, like Jhhnn you should just admit she lied and get it over with. It's not like doing so will cost you money or something, it'll just show that you actually have internalized what she did. Continuing to deny the obvious is bad for your health.