Why the fascination with Harry Potter

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nik

Lifer
Jun 5, 2006
16,101
3
56
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: GuideBot
I like star wars, I like lord of the rings, I like good stories. I hate the Harry Potter books and movies. They're just f'ing retarded.

Why are they retarded? How is Star Wars not equally retarded?

I don't know. :(

I just can't stand Harry Potter.
 

glutenberg

Golden Member
Sep 2, 2004
1,941
0
0
Originally posted by: GuideBot
Originally posted by: glutenberg
Originally posted by: GuideBot
I like star wars, I like lord of the rings, I like good stories. I hate the Harry Potter books and movies. They're just f'ing retarded.

Why are they retarded? How is Star Wars not equally retarded?

I don't know. :(

I just can't stand Harry Potter.

Well, at least that's an honest answer. Maybe you dislike things that are popular? I mean, if you think about it, Harry Potter and Star Wars have similar parallels. You're brisked away into a magical world of supernatural abilities. The main protagonist is a superhero in disguise. He goes through a series of adventures, some twists and turns, makes some friends, and takes down the baddie because of his chosen one powers. Add in an incestuous kiss and wah-la, you've got an epic tale of daring escapades through an imaginary world.

Rinse and repeat for LOTR.
 
Nov 5, 2001
18,366
3
0
Originally posted by: CatKillaZ
Great input their buddy. No wonder you got 14,304 posts.

says the guy who has 168 posts in 9 days. You are a troll, pure and simple. You have started several threads about gays, several Harry Potter threads, and a callout thread asking how gay the mods were.

Frankly, I don't understand how you have avoided the banstick so far. 2 weeks ago you would have been banned within a day of acting this way.
 

antillean

Member
Jun 13, 2007
136
0
0
Originally posted by: wnangle
WOW - I'm so glad someone had the guts to start a thread like this. My 9 year old son is very in to Harry Potter. I think that is great. He wants to see the movies too, which I think is great. Is a book written on a 4th grade level also written for adults? I don't think so. I started to watch one of the Harry Potter movies with my son one evening and will have to admit, after about 15 minutes I was bored senseless and could not quite understand what my 9 year old found so fascinating. It appears to me that adults are reverting back to their 4th and 5th grade childhood with these stories and want to be found 'KOOL' with the younger group. Just my opinion.

Harry Potter is trendy with college and high school kids. They aren't trying to impress 5th graders or anything
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: CatKillaZ
I do not see how this topic is more trolling than any other on this board?

Examples...

coffee upsets my stomach

Got a call from Sprint, I suspect it's a scam

$55 too much for a flashlight

OMG It's RAINING!!

Weight lifting question: Smith machine for squats


Either way, I really don't care what everyone here thinks..

Then, if you're asking a question, but don't care what people's answers are, how is that not trolling? -DrP

you need to learn the difference between neffing and trolling.
 

CatKillaZ

Banned
Jul 9, 2007
261
0
0
Please explain the difference. It seems like because I am new to the forum I am trolling, but people that have been here longer can create whatever dumb topics they want.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: StartingLine
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Imp
I haven't read it before, and am pretty confident that it's good/well written. Little boy wizards not my idea of fun. However, I still think there's way too much hype for the book/movies. At least it helps sales...


it's the opposite, actually. it's well written enough so that people don't have to guess what's going on...but so is Stephen King :p There is certianly nothing clever, or original about the writing.

it's a simple, predictable story that is understandably appealing to children. I can only fathom that adults find it appealing because so many of them also found DaVinci Code appealing (engaging story, but simple, hackneyed writing more cliche'd than a Mel Brooks joke...no offense to Mel Brooks)...

I think you can find Harry Potter in grocery stores, no? that explains a lot....

stating jk rowling is at the level of stephen king is pretty insulting. I cant really think of any Stephen King novel that is at the 4th grade level or lord help you what Stephen King books do you want your 4th grader to read lol.

i've read all the HP books so far. While reading them, there were thigns that happened or were mentioned that I thought were kind of more on the "adult" side than the "children's" side.

My favorite author is probably Terry Pratchett. He writes books for young adults/children as well as adults. I've read all of his young adult/children's books. is it because i'm dumb, immature, or can't read? No, it's because I like his style and he knows how to tell a great story.

The only Stephen King book I've read is The Green Mile. I've read stuff about Stephen King's writing that isn't very flattering. Its not like his writing is really deep or insightful.

I'd really like to see the "library" that some of you HP haters have. I'd bet it would be very telling.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: CatKillaZ
Please explain the difference. It seems like because I am new to the forum I am trolling, but people that have been here longer can create whatever dumb topics they want.

bashing people for their likes and dislikes is trolling
talking about irrelevant crap is neffing.
 

Atheus

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2005
7,313
2
0
I'd much rather read Harry Potter than the horseshit many adults read - Dan Brown comes to mind - but I still find it quite strange that people choose it over other fantasy/adventure stuff. If I want to read about heroes and magical creatues and such there's plenty out there...

Still, if it gets poorly educated people reading who otherwise wouldn't, then I'm all for it.
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: Atheus
I'd much rather read Harry Potter than the horseshit many adults read - Dan Brown comes to mind - but I still find it quite strange that people choose it over other fantasy/adventure stuff. If I want to read about heroes and magical creatues and such there's plenty out there...

Still, if it gets poorly educated people reading who otherwise wouldn't, then I'm all for it.

so Harry Potter readers are poorly educated? :roll:
 

Dumac

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,391
1
0
Originally posted by: pontifex

i've read all the HP books so far. While reading them, there were thigns that happened or were mentioned that I thought were kind of more on the "adult" side than the "children's" side.

My favorite author is probably Terry Pratchett. He writes books for young adults/children as well as adults. I've read all of his young adult/children's books. is it because i'm dumb, immature, or can't read? No, it's because I like his style and he knows how to tell a great story.

The only Stephen King book I've read is The Green Mile. I've read stuff about Stephen King's writing that isn't very flattering. Its not like his writing is really deep or insightful.

I'd really like to see the "library" that some of you HP haters have. I'd bet it would be very telling.

I like Terry Pratchett as well. I think his Discworld series provides a humorous and refreshing approach to fantasy fiction. However, I also believe his writing is on a higher level than J. K. Rowling's, if only by a small degree.

The Harry Potter series has it's positive qualities. It has humor, action, and an involving story that pulls in many readers, as we can tell by this thread. Also, the books are an easy read, creating a pull towards a wide audience. It is a great series for children, and one that I will gladly recommend to my child, when I finally have one.

However, like many children's books, the series has it's downfalls. These downfalls are to be expected and typical of such literature.

Almost every character in Harry Potter in two dimensional and shallow. The plot, while lovable, is completely predictable.

The undeniable fact is that Harry Potter is not adult literature. Although many adults enjoy the series, perhaps due to its childlike charm or the gift of nostalgia it presents upon older readers, the books are written for children when considering both content and sentence structure. There is nothing wrong with adults reading Harry Potter, especially if they want to share an experience with their own child, but don't bother denying the level of the book. Hopefully these readers also enjoy some more mature pieces as well.

Personally, I read the series partly because of a feeling of obligation. Also, I enjoy the sense of nostalgia present while I continue a series I started in my early childhood (I started the series in 4th grade, if i remember correctly). It is the same as if I were playing a video game related to one I played long ago.

P.S. I know some will probably disagree with this, but I believe Stephen King is a whore of words. His inability to diverge from what he has done for years long gone combined with his habit of quickly producing similar work over and over makes me see him as a sellout as an author. Granted, some of his books are great works and should be enjoyed, but the author himself is nothing spectacular in my opinion.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Atheus
I'd much rather read Harry Potter than the horseshit many adults read - Dan Brown comes to mind - but I still find it quite strange that people choose it over other fantasy/adventure stuff. If I want to read about heroes and magical creatues and such there's plenty out there...

Still, if it gets poorly educated people reading who otherwise wouldn't, then I'm all for it.

I know 2 highly educated people that enjoy the books. One is a mechanical engineer and the other a children's psychologist
. Both loved the books.

while i do not have as high a education as those two i enjoyed the first 4 a lot. they are easy to read, go fast, and the story while very predictable they are good.
 

akshatp

Diamond Member
Oct 15, 1999
8,349
0
76
I have to agree with OP. I am not a fan of this childish HP stuff either, and dont understand the great hype and following by adults.

That being said, everyone has a right to their own likes/dislikes. Im sure many people dont like watching soccer, or hockey, or football, and think its childish for grown men to get in uniform and play team sports. Its called an opinion, and everyone has a right to their own one.

BTW, I tried watching LOTR and hated that too. Got about 1 hour into the first movie before I was in a deep sleep. My wife goes absolutely gaga over any and all of these sci-fi phenomenons (HP, LOTR, SW, etc)

I thought Star Wars was okay, mainly because of the cool special effects that Lucas created in the 70s and 80s.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
Originally posted by: StartingLine
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Imp
I haven't read it before, and am pretty confident that it's good/well written. Little boy wizards not my idea of fun. However, I still think there's way too much hype for the book/movies. At least it helps sales...


it's the opposite, actually. it's well written enough so that people don't have to guess what's going on...but so is Stephen King :p There is certianly nothing clever, or original about the writing.

it's a simple, predictable story that is understandably appealing to children. I can only fathom that adults find it appealing because so many of them also found DaVinci Code appealing (engaging story, but simple, hackneyed writing more cliche'd than a Mel Brooks joke...no offense to Mel Brooks)...

I think you can find Harry Potter in grocery stores, no? that explains a lot....

stating jk rowling is at the level of stephen king is pretty insulting. I cant really think of any Stephen King novel that is at the 4th grade level or lord help you what Stephen King books do you want your 4th grader to read lol.


I read some Stephen King in the 4th or 5th grade. but yeah, since they are on-par in terms of writing ability (they certainly are), I would think comparing them would be an honor for Stephen King. She's clearly more successful than he is ;)
 

Alone

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2006
7,490
0
0
I started reading Harry Potter books about 8 years ago. 8 years ago it was the type of book that such a child should be reading. Do you think I'm gonna stop being interested in the end after waiting so long?
 

Alone

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2006
7,490
0
0
Originally posted by: ViviTheMage
IMO Radcliffe has gotten worse as an actor as the movies went on....some of his facial expressions are just weird....and out of place.

Flashbacks of when he was playing his role in "Equus".
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
I find it amusing how people try and mock the reading level of Harry Potter books. Serious, read current adult books. They're at the same reading level. Hell, in the Harry Potter books, I see a much better use of vocabulary and complexity in the stories than a lot of the drivel coming out by "adult" authors. I read Dan Brown and I think the only word he knows is incredulous.

Let's be honest, the reading level on most books is very low. The only difference is the amount of sex, swears and violence.

Also, as for those mocking them being little kids, you do realize that each book represents a new year? In the last book, they're supposed to be 17-18 year olds (mostly 17 if it makes you guys feel better).
 

Dumac

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,391
1
0
Originally posted by: Strk
I find it amusing how people try and mock the reading level of Harry Potter books. Serious, read current adult books. They're at the same reading level. Hell, in the Harry Potter books, I see a much better use of vocabulary and complexity in the stories than a lot of the drivel coming out by "adult" authors. I read Dan Brown and I think the only word he knows is incredulous.

Let's be honest, the reading level on most books is very low. The only difference is the amount of sex, swears and violence.

Also, as for those mocking them being little kids, you do realize that each book represents a new year? In the last book, they're supposed to be 17-18 year olds (mostly 17 if it makes you guys feel better).

Who the hell started using Dan Brown a key example of mature literature? :confused:
 

PimpJuice

Platinum Member
Feb 14, 2005
2,051
1
76
Originally posted by: Strk
I find it amusing how people try and mock the reading level of Harry Potter books. Serious, read current adult books. They're at the same reading level. Hell, in the Harry Potter books, I see a much better use of vocabulary and complexity in the stories than a lot of the drivel coming out by "adult" authors. I read Dan Brown and I think the only word he knows is incredulous.

Let's be honest, the reading level on most books is very low. The only difference is the amount of sex, swears and violence.

Also, as for those mocking them being little kids, you do realize that each book represents a new year? In the last book, they're supposed to be 17-18 year olds (mostly 17 if it makes you guys feel better).

Harry Potter is a childrens book, the story had to become darker because the readers of the original books grew up with along with the books and arent kids anymore.

Either way, I still think its a book for kids and adults who like to read fantasy/adventure books for kids. To call Harry Potter an 'adult' book is a insult to all of the real adult audience books out there.
 

zerocool1

Diamond Member
Jun 7, 2002
4,486
1
81
femaven.blogspot.com
Originally posted by: JeffreyLebowski
Originally posted by: MikeyLSU
it is a well written series that people are anxious to know how it ends.

Each book is quite different from the rest. Yes, we know it will end in a showdown of some sort, but that is no different than knowing that Frodo will end up at mount doom in LoTR.

It is the storytelling of how they get to that point which makes it great. I was in your shoes a couple of years ago, the people who loved HP that I knew were people I didn't really like so I was turned off by the whole thing.
Then, I decided to give it a shot and read books 1-5, and have been hooked since(this was before book 6 came out).

I actually don't know 1 person that has read through at least book 4 that doesn't like the series.

Well by saying you don't know anyone that hasn't read through the 1st 4 books, that's like saying, I don't know anyone that hasn't been to 400 Yankee games that isn't a fan.

My GF reads the HP books, and wanted me to read it. I can't read something with the ludicrous childish names that are plastered all through it. I think I read 2 pages and gave up. Plus I'm not real big on the whole "chosen one" syndrome. I like my heroes to be someone that is just doing their thing and get caught in a bad spot. Kinda like John McClaine in the Die Hard movies.

so i take it you're a fan of LOTR?

 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,695
31,043
146
Originally posted by: Strk
I find it amusing how people try and mock the reading level of Harry Potter books. Serious, read current adult books. They're at the same reading level. Hell, in the Harry Potter books, I see a much better use of vocabulary and complexity in the stories than a lot of the drivel coming out by "adult" authors. I read Dan Brown and I think the only word he knows is incredulous.

Let's be honest, the reading level on most books is very low. The only difference is the amount of sex, swears and violence.

Also, as for those mocking them being little kids, you do realize that each book represents a new year? In the last book, they're supposed to be 17-18 year olds (mostly 17 if it makes you guys feel better).


believe me, you'll find me mocking the majority of authors that I can only assume you would classify as "adult." (read back through this thread for a few examples) ;)
 

pontifex

Lifer
Dec 5, 2000
43,804
46
91
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: Strk
I find it amusing how people try and mock the reading level of Harry Potter books. Serious, read current adult books. They're at the same reading level. Hell, in the Harry Potter books, I see a much better use of vocabulary and complexity in the stories than a lot of the drivel coming out by "adult" authors. I read Dan Brown and I think the only word he knows is incredulous.

Let's be honest, the reading level on most books is very low. The only difference is the amount of sex, swears and violence.

Also, as for those mocking them being little kids, you do realize that each book represents a new year? In the last book, they're supposed to be 17-18 year olds (mostly 17 if it makes you guys feel better).


believe me, you'll find me mocking the majority of authors that I can only assume you would classify as "adult." (read back through this thread for a few examples) ;)

what would you classify as an adult book? examples of books and authors
 

jupiter57

Diamond Member
Nov 18, 2001
4,600
3
71
Originally posted by: CatKillaZ
Aren't we a little old to be watching/reading this? Everyone knows the ending anyhow. Harry and Voldemort will fight, and I am sure Harry will win. Big surprise there...

Please tell me why these are such great movies/books? I have read a few and find it only meant for kids. Why the interest for many adults?

Dude!
Aren't you like only 12-13 years old?
You ARE a kid.