Yeah. I don't pay any attention to politics tbh. Only recently I am because of the Iran conflict. How much can you really believe of what you hear anyways? I know it's true about the Chinese hoax bit but I honestly don't believe 80% of what I see on the news. Fox, CNN, or whatever.
That’s the position of literally every Democrat running for president to the best of my knowledge.
So you think women should be incubators for non-viable fetuses, with conditions such as severe hydrocephelus or other fatal congenital defects? With so few women seeking and obtaining abortions late-term, and the nature of medical science, it seems both cruel and unnecessary to put hard and fast regulatory caps on the procedure.Really? Regardless of "health" exceptions? You think every democrat presidential candidate would claim, "Beyond X weeks, you may not have an abortion for any reason beyond saving the life of the mother"?
So you think women should be incubators for non-viable fetuses, with conditions such as severe hydrocephelus or other fatal congenital defects?
Really? Regardless of "health" exceptions? You think every democrat presidential candidate would claim, "Beyond X weeks, you may not have an abortion for any reason beyond saving the life of the mother"?
I'm just pointing out the very real effects of a hard restriction on abortion.Not the question. I want to know if democrat candidates are, as fskimospy said, generally in favor of some real restrictions on abortion.
On a side note, it's always interesting when a single-issue abortion voter is a man...
I'm just pointing out the very real effects of a hard restriction on abortion.
![]()
"Pro-Choice" or "Pro-Life," 2018-2019 Demographic Tables
Americans' identification in 2018-19 as "pro-choice" or "pro-life" on abortion is provided here in tabular form, with breakouts by key population subgroups.news.gallup.com
![]()
This graph doesn't really address the statement though. The poll doesn't seem to say any of those people are single issue voters.
Well then your conditioning is complete.Yeah. I don't pay any attention to politics tbh. Only recently I am because of the Iran conflict. How much can you really believe of what you hear anyways? I know it's true about the Chinese hoax bit but I honestly don't believe 80% of what I see on the news. Fox, CNN, or whatever.
But it does address the implication that men should have no opinion on abortion because they're not women.
Only in the sense that they're part of the poll, another dubious assertion. Your opinion may not be taken into a account between a woman and her licensed healthcare professionals.
I'm not going to be drawn further into the abortion debate. I'm more interested in what fskimospy claimed.
There are plenty of women that are happy to oppress other women. For example, women past menopause who are vehemently pro life should have just as much say as men. Really, the only people this affects are women that can get pregnant now or in the future. And no I'm not interested in starting a debate about whether or not the fetus qualifies as people so don't even start.But it does address the implication that men should have no opinion on abortion because they're not women, or that men only oppose abortion as a mechanism for oppressing women.
Fski posted a reply to you already.I'm not going to be drawn further into the abortion debate. I'm more interested in what fskimospy claimed.
Pretty much, yeah.
Democrats are generally pretty moderate on abortion, with most accepting bans in the third trimester of some sort. Did you really think all Democrats are for unrestricted abortion or something? Is that what right wing media has been telling you?
Trust Trump, that's all you need to know:
And of course, a conservative trusted news source:
![]()
Donald Trump says Hillary Clinton would let abortion doctors ‘rip baby out of womb’
Abortion emerged as a flash point in the final presidential debate Wednesday night, with Republican Donald Trump claiming his opponent, Hillary Clinton, would allow doctors to “rip the baby out of the womb” just days before birth.www.washingtontimes.com
50 year grudge, even though actual numbers show how abortions are happening less and less.
Roe vs Wade inadvertently opened the door to more comprehensive sexual education, with a focus on preventing unwanted pregnancies, and it worked....even with conservatives fighting that also.
Data and Statistics - Reproductive Health | CDC
Monitoring maternal and infant mortality and reproductive health complications and gathering data to better understand the extent of maternal and infant morbidity.www.cdc.gov
91% were at or less than 13 weeks.
Guys like Atreus want 0 abortions, that's what all those conservative states are doing with a challenge to R v W. It's not the wild west like they want people to believe it is.
I mean if he wants zero abortions that’s his business but he said he was open to voting for Democrats if they moderated on abortion.
The good news is that every single candidate to the best of my knowledge already holds the moderate position he wants! I suspect this will not change his vote though.
For someone who is so anti-abortion I've never seen you advoate for free birth control. Seems that would make sense![]()
"Pro-Choice" or "Pro-Life," 2018-2019 Demographic Tables
Americans' identification in 2018-19 as "pro-choice" or "pro-life" on abortion is provided here in tabular form, with breakouts by key population subgroups.news.gallup.com
![]()
There's a case to be made that women are more pro-life than men, and are also more likely to be pro-life than pro-choice.