What should we do with Islam?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SuperTool

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
14,000
2
0
I must say Islam has a lot of catching up to do. But they do have the demographics, conversions, and high birth rates going for them, unlike Judaism. The main thing Jews have going for us is that we are spread out, so we are like Gnutella, so it's harder to kill us. Which is why I am against having so many Jews leave European countries and go to Israel. Then we are more like Napster, easier to kill. Like the saying goes, when Jews are spread out, we are like fertilizer, but if we are concentrated, it's just a pile of sh!t.
 

xochi

Senior member
Jan 18, 2000
891
6
81
Originally posted by: heartsurgeon
Islam has been regarded as a renegade religion
Will Islam eventually follow Judaism, where it borrows certain aspects of Christianity and becomes wholly Westernized
You are to ignorant to be a Euroweenie, but i still feel you would feel right at home in France.
Your first comment is essentially racist.
Your second comment is just plan absurd..Christianity arose out of Judaism, Judaim has borrowed NOTHING from Christianity..without Judaism, Christianity WOULDN'T EVEN EXIST.

you are correct, Jesus was the first liberal Jew.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: SuperTool
I must say Islam has a lot of catching up to do. But they do have the demographics, conversions, and high birth rates going for them, unlike Judaism. The main thing Jews have going for us is that we are spread out, so we are like Gnutella, so it's harder to kill us. Which is why I am against having so many Jews leave European countries and go to Israel. Then we are more like Napster, easier to kill. Like the saying goes, when Jews are spread out, we are like fertilizer, but if we are concentrated, it's just a pile of sh!t.

Yeah, but unfortunately we aren't pumping kids out so our numbers are decreasing :(

And, Dari, some may say they believe in heaven and hell, but they probably don't practice very often, if at all, other than just saying they are Jewish.(kind of like the Christians who say they're Christian but the only thing they do is open presents on Christmas, but they never actually celebrate anything to do with Christ. And remember, getting a new GameCube and being happy over it isn't celebrating your saviors birth ;))

You have to remember, there is a big difference when someone just says they are of a certain faith and ones who practice it.
 

CarltheUnholy

Member
Apr 13, 2003
26
0
0
*sigh*

Corrections for some....

"Islam" has as much right to exist as Christianity. All terrorists are not Muslims, nor are all muslims terrorists. By the logic that something has to be 'done' with Islam, then something must also be done with Catholicism and Protestanism.... or are the Irish terrorists Muslims? Religion is not responsible for terrorism, idiotic fools are.

Islam is not 700-800 years younger than Christianity. It began becoming a widespread, well-known religion at around the 8th century A.D. (I don't intend to use the overly politically correct 'C.E.', or Common Era), but it's roots take it back several hundred more years.

Christianity is, for all intents and purposes, an extension from Judaism, not the other way around.

The Jews did not believe in hell. Nor do they now. Or, more precisely, the Torah (which is basically the Old Testament) makes no mention of the Christian Heaven or Hell. Neither does the Old Testament. There is mention of Heaven as the Kingdom of God, but not that it's a great reward for leading a virtuous life. When Soddom and Gomorrah were destroyed, there is no mention of their souls suffering eternal torment. Satan does not exist in the Torah, or the Old Testament. Go ahead, check, I'll wait. Oh, the serpent? Well, it never says he's the devil, does it? All it says is that the Serpent tempted Eve with the knowledge to be as God. God was pissed off because, and I quote, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me, for I am a jealous God."

The concept that religion does not belong in government is understandable, based on our currently secular society. However, our secular society has absolutely NO right to dictate to the rest of the sovereign world how they may govern themselves. Also, why aren't complaining about Vatican City? It enjoys legal status as a separate nation, governed completely by the Pope. It has one of the most well-trained and well-armed security forces in the world. Imagine what could happen if they were unleashed in the middle of Rome. Shouldn't they then be 'dealt' with, as well?
 

robh23

Banned
Jan 28, 2004
236
0
0
Originally posted by: CarltheUnholy
*sigh*

Corrections for some....

"Islam" has as much right to exist as Christianity. All terrorists are not Muslims, nor are all muslims terrorists. By the logic that something has to be 'done' with Islam, then something must also be done with Catholicism and Protestanism.... or are the Irish terrorists Muslims? Religion is not responsible for terrorism, idiotic fools are.

Islam is not 700-800 years younger than Christianity. It began becoming a widespread, well-known religion at around the 8th century A.D. (I don't intend to use the overly politically correct 'C.E.', or Common Era), but it's roots take it back several hundred more years.

Christianity is, for all intents and purposes, an extension from Judaism, not the other way around.

The Jews did not believe in hell. Nor do they now. Or, more precisely, the Torah (which is basically the Old Testament) makes no mention of the Christian Heaven or Hell. Neither does the Old Testament. There is mention of Heaven as the Kingdom of God, but not that it's a great reward for leading a virtuous life. When Soddom and Gomorrah were destroyed, there is no mention of their souls suffering eternal torment. Satan does not exist in the Torah, or the Old Testament. Go ahead, check, I'll wait. Oh, the serpent? Well, it never says he's the devil, does it? All it says is that the Serpent tempted Eve with the knowledge to be as God. God was pissed off because, and I quote, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me, for I am a jealous God."

The concept that religion does not belong in government is understandable, based on our currently secular society. However, our secular society has absolutely NO right to dictate to the rest of the sovereign world how they may govern themselves. Also, why aren't complaining about Vatican City? It enjoys legal status as a separate nation, governed completely by the Pope. It has one of the most well-trained and well-armed security forces in the world. Imagine what could happen if they were unleashed in the middle of Rome. Shouldn't they then be 'dealt' with, as well?

from my studies i seem to remember that islam started aroung 665 or thereabounts ad then spread rapidly. it coverd much of north africa, the mid east and iran within a decade or so.
 

tnitsuj

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
5,446
0
76
Originally posted by: Dari
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Dari,
The only thing that you have proven in this thread is that you know very little about Judaism or Islam.

I may know little about either but I sure as hell know more than you. Ask any Jew if they believe in a heaven or hell and the most likely answer will be "yes." As for this thread, it was a question about the future of Islam, considering all the pressure it is currently under. If you don't understand something, just ask.

You are to ignorant to be a Euroweenie, but i still feel you would feel right at home in France.
Your first comment is essentially racist.
Your second comment is just plan absurd..Christianity arose out of Judaism, Judaim has borrowed NOTHING from Christianity..without Judaism, Christianity WOULDN'T EVEN EXIST.

I'd be very careful there, heartsurgeon. Perhaps it is you who don't know about these two religions. If you're a strong believer, I'd ask you to get out of this thread. Otherwise, I invite you discuss the future of Islam and the history of Christianity and Judaism. Don't think for a second that dominating derivatives can't have an impact on that which they came from. Ever studied Christianity (aside from what's in the Bible)?


I am a Jew. You are wrong. Judaism is not "westernized". Your comments about Islam are just as misinformed and bigoted...and you still haven't answered the question as to what your religion is??
 

CarltheUnholy

Member
Apr 13, 2003
26
0
0
from my studies i seem to remember that islam started aroung 665 or thereabounts ad then spread rapidly. it coverd much of north africa, the mid east and iran within a decade or so.

610 A.D., actually. Though, Muhammed was born in 570. The precursors to the Islamic faith existed before then, based on teachings that claimed the Jews had corrupted the pure faith.

By the way, I am a completely neutral Agnostic. I went to Catholic School, studied the Jewish faith (don't ask), and have also studied Islam, Wicca, Satanism, and Atheism. I think they've all got interesting bits of information, I think they're all antiquated control processes.

However, people have a right to their beliefs and to govern themsleves by those beliefs. The First Amendment of the United States Constituion acknowledges the inalienable right of the people to free speech and free expression of religion. To say this only applies to Christians would be a typical Christian sentiment (reference: Crusades I through XI, Missionary efforts, Inquisition, etc.). To say this only applies to Americans is the most pompous, short-sighted, and bigoted statement an American could make, and denies the very essence of what our society is supposed to be about.
 

maXroOt

Member
Jun 25, 2003
59
0
0
god you have an iggnorant view of islam

a friend of mine is a Major in the Army and is high up in the anti terrorist department, and even he knows/understands that terrorism is not inherent in islam.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: InfectedMushroom
another discussion about who's imaginary friend is better? ;)

Not yet! Right now it's more of a "what is your imaginary friend telling you to do" kind of thread ;)
 

CarltheUnholy

Member
Apr 13, 2003
26
0
0
Actually, it's more of a "Are other people entitled to their imaginary friends, because obviously only my imaginary friend is real" kind of thread.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
There's something wrong with Freedom of Religion? :confused:
rolleye.gif
:disgust:

Seeking to control what people believe in is the very definition of tyranny.
 

tnitsuj

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
5,446
0
76
Originally posted by: Vic
There's something wrong with Freedom of Religion? :confused:
rolleye.gif
:disgust:

Seeking to control what people believe in is the very definition of tyranny.

Dari doesn't seem to understand that.
 

Shad0hawK

Banned
May 26, 2003
1,456
0
0
Originally posted by: Dari

Heaven as in "heaven and earth"? Or heaven as in "heaven and hell"? Those are two different heavens. But let me make myself clear. Until Christianity came along, Jews did not believe that the good would go to heaven and the bad would go to hell. That was a product of the first Christians, who used heaven and hell as a justifiable meatphor for the sufferings by the hands of the Romans.

soryy, i had gotten busy and neglected this thread


in answer to your question, both, depending on which sect. i think your making a reference to sheol, which is similar to the greek hades. there was an "afterlife" some went ot punishment, others to reward. the pharasees beleived in this literally, many saducees did to ,but did not beleive in a literal resurrection of the dead this idea(and in fact christianity itself.) comes striaght from pharasaical judaism. for the first few hundred years christianity took the writing to be very literal, it was not until augustine that heavey metophorical interpretation became prevelant in the catholic church, even to the point of "interpreting"..and acting.. opposite what teh bible actually said, and making it illegal for non preists to posses the bible or read it.

in fact you will find in the new testament where Yashua was in sheol during his 3 days of death preaching to the spirits of the dead(1 peter 4), this is not presented as a metophor or allegory.





 

kylebisme

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2000
9,396
0
0
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: Vic
There's something wrong with Freedom of Religion? :confused:
rolleye.gif
:disgust:

Seeking to control what people believe in is the very definition of tyranny.

Dari doesn't seem to understand that.

i'm under the impression that it is more an issue of him not seeing anything wrong with that.
 

Wag

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2000
8,288
8
81
Frankly, I'm more concerned about Buddhists.

You can't get rid of them...they only come back for more in the next life.
 

InfectedMushroom

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2001
1,064
0
0
Originally posted by: CarltheUnholy
Actually, it's more of a "Are other people entitled to their imaginary friends, because obviously only my imaginary friend is real" kind of thread.

eh. my bad. i got bored midway through the thread. :D
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: Wag
Frankly, I'm more concerned about Buddhists.

You can't get rid of them...they only come back for more in the next life.

lol, that made me laugh.
 

SherEPunjab

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2002
3,841
0
0
Originally posted by: Wag
Frankly, I'm more concerned about Buddhists.

You can't get rid of them...they only come back for more in the next life.

Lol... wait... I believe in reincarnation too.... :|

j/k good stuff
 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: Vic
There's something wrong with Freedom of Religion? :confused:
rolleye.gif
:disgust:

Seeking to control what people believe in is the very definition of tyranny.

Dari doesn't seem to understand that.

Isn't that also a tenet of many religions, seeking to control what people believe in?



 

StormRider

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2000
8,324
2
0
Originally posted by: FrodoB
We shouldn't do anything with "Islam." Remember, Islam is 700 - 800 years younger than "Christianity." 700 years ago was not a proud time for the Catholic Church. Islam hasn't had as much time to evolve.
With the kind of weaponry and rapid communications that exist today, it's easier for governments to control large populations. The oppressive governments and other instiutions of authority in the Muslim world deprived its people of so many freedoms and basic means to survive that it's easy to make their people believe that the U.S. is to blame for their problems. I firmly believe that we need to help (well, continue to help) in eliminating the oppressive regimes and terrorist leaders of the Muslim world. Freedom is a basic human instinct. Once freedom is permitted to flourish in the Muslim world, the religion will evolve into a more tolerating and peacefull religion. But this will take a very long time. It has to happen some time. It's beginning to happen. Iraq is on its way to a free society. Iran is facing major unrest from within. Turkey is on its way to become a member of the EU. Saudi Arabia has a very large youth population (60% under 18) that has been partially introduced to western culture, making it perhaps a candidate for change in the future. THe future looks bright. Similar to western culture, the transformation takes a lot of time.

Since Mormonism is younger than Islam, will we have to worry about radical Mormons in the future?
 

SherEPunjab

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2002
3,841
0
0
MMM.. i think that every religion was INTENDED to be and do good. I don't think that Islam was necessarily an EVIL religion, although I do think it is distorted and abused, by its own followers.

A religion should be separated from its followers actions.

Yes, as I have stated before, I think Islam needs major reform, but the Title of this thread may be a wee bit offensive - to me, at least it sounds like its a PROBLEM. I think we should look closely if the religion itself is a problem, or if its practitioners are.