Alpha One Seven
Golden Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 1,098
- 124
- 66
Not sure what it has to do with an SLK though.Well, here's what Edmunds says:
So... that sounds pretty good.
Not sure what it has to do with an SLK though.Well, here's what Edmunds says:
So... that sounds pretty good.
Not sure what it has to do with an SLK though.
Get ready to spend 6 figures the first time it needs windshield wipers and an oil change.
Get ready to spend 6 figures the first time it needs windshield wipers and an oil change.
Get ready to spend 6 figures the first time it needs windshield wipers and an oil change.
47,000 on a 21 year old car? Although that's more miles than I drive, I'd still be concerned about odometer shenanigans. And there's the issue of Bentley reliability:Well, I'd have it checked mechanically before buying - I just talked to them and they said it's in good shape. I drive like 2,000 miles a year so don't put a lot of wear on a car.
47,000 on a 21 year old car? Although that's more miles than I drive, I'd still be concerned about odometer shenanigans. And there's the issue of Bentley reliability:
https://www.osv.ltd.uk/are-bentley-reliable/
With your budget you can get a new car or a used car with a warranty. As-is used cars can be a nightmare, but of course aren't always.That's not a positive article about Bentley reliability, but I still suspect light driving might not be a problem.
With your budget you can get a new car or a used car with a warranty. As-is used cars can be a nightmare, but of course aren't always.
Edit: My last car was bought used and although generally reliable turned out to be a flood recovery car, and had been in a major accident. Neither of those things were on the useless CarFax report (which isn't free), nor were they mentioned by the seller. People selling cars too often try to hide stuff like that, and it's easy to get away with.
It was, and was given a clean bill of health. The first discovery was rust all around the windshield, but only internally visible when part of the trim came loose. Second was when I went to replace the stock speakers, their paper cones had obvious water damage, and two were high up on the interior wall. It also had been rear-ended, which I discovered when I pulled the interior panel off of the tailgate to install sound deadening. Later the Bondo in that area sunk.How did you find out? I'd have it looked at by a mechanic.
lol Talk about a small drivers area. Those are Fords since they were bought out. If I were to get a Ford, It would be a newer Taurus. You can get a 2016 Limited for around 34,000.00.Oh my... Jaguar convertible... above the budget but tempting for $39K, only 7K miles:
https://www.truecar.com/used-cars-for-sale/listing/SAJWA6E78E8K08766/2014-jaguar-f-type/
lol Talk about a small drivers area. Those are Fords since they were bought out. If I were to get a Ford, It would be a newer Taurus. You can get a 2016 Limited for around 34,000.00.
I went and looked at several cars, and found that a lot are smaller driver areas than I expected - I'd like a roomy area. Cars like Ford Fusion, Camaro, of course Miata, and others - too small.
And cars weren't all that comfortable - not one jumped out as 'this is very comfortable'. Some that were at least roomy enough and not too bad on comfort were Chrysler 300, Acura TS/TSC/RSX, and similar. Cadillac CTX wasn't too bad but was a bit less comfortable for some reason. A Buick was actually relatively comfortable.
So I still haven't found a convertible for the list yet; it seems to be narrowing to a 'comfortable' car - with various price choices or if I can find that 'comfortable convertible'.
One thing is that it's harder to see older models, dealers tend not to have any, for example no old Crown Victorias to check out at Ford, or 430's at Lexus.
I think he wants bench seats with no center console or "hump" between the seats ....You thought a Fusion was cramped? Weird.
Oh. That's old-fashioned. Last car I saw like that was a '92 F-150.I think he wants bench seats with no center console or "hump" between the seats ....