"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven*. Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'"
"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that?"
*"Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all our soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: Love your neighbor as yourself."
Originally posted by: IGBT
... when liberals are not trying to pass Nazism off as ?fascism,? they are attempting to pass it off as an extreme form of ?conservatism? and an inexorable byproduct of Christianity. In 2003, on his show Scarborough Country, former congressman and current MSNBC personality Joe Scarborough shed light on a college textbook that grouped Rush Limbaugh and Ronald Reagan with Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini as ?conservatives.?< Now how exactly could Hitler, a man who was a strong supporter of social welfare programs, gun control, animal rights, government funding for the arts and bans against smoking in public get away with being called a ?conservative??
The reason is simple. Liberals are such shameless liars and persistent revisionists that they will malign anyone they disagree with as Hitleresque, from the spastic Iraq war protestors comparing George W. Bush to Hitler to Sen. Dick Durbin comparing American troops to ?Nazis.? Perhaps this is on account of the equivalence of their deep-seated rejection of God to Hitler?s militant rejection of God which led to one of the ugliest mass murders in human history. But wait a minute, wasn?t Hitler a Christian also?
Well if being a Christian means claiming the role of God for one?s self and coercing the subjects of one?s rule to shake off their beliefs in Christ and pledge a new allegiance to the Third Reich, then perhaps Hitler was a Christian. But this certainly doesn?t explain why the Nazis harassed, arrested, tortured and murdered Christian clergymen for espousing their beliefs, or for that matter why during the first five years of the Nazis? rule a majority of concentration camp inmates were Christians, Jews being late arrivals for the most part, nor does it explain why on November 4, 1936, the Nazis ordered the removal of crucifixes from schools in the Oldenburg area on account of the notion that they were ?symbols of superstition.?
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
He possibly could be a Christian. To God, all sin is equal. We can't really comprehend that as to us, killing people is WAY worse then stealing a bag of chips from the store, and yes it is worse, but either one is a sin, and is impurity, which deserves hell.
Thankfully if you believe Jesus died on the cross and ask him to forgive your sins that makes you a Christian. It's really that easy, so even Hitler could possibly do it.
Originally posted by: TehMac
He was an Occultist. Mainly he was crazy. He was raised a Catholic, but adopted his own ideas that appealed to the neo-paganism of 1930's Germany. Essentially he was an Atheist.
As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.
I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator.
Even today I am not ashamed to say that, overpowered by stormy enthusiasm, I fell down on my knees and thanked Heaven from an overflowing heart for granting me the good fortune of being permitted to live at this time.
Who says I am not under the special protection of God?
Most if not all people that claims that they are a "Christian" talk the talk, but do not do the walk.Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Doesn't matter what he claimed.....his life indicates that he was not a Christian. Even if he was baptized as one (and I don't know whether he was or not) that doesn't automatically make you a Christian the rest of your life. You have to walk the walk, and obviously, he did not.
So what's the point?
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Doesn't matter what he claimed.....his life indicates that he was not a Christian. Even if he was baptized as one (and I don't know whether he was or not) that doesn't automatically make you a Christian the rest of your life. You have to walk the walk, and obviously, he did not.
So what's the point?
if someoen believes that jesus christ is the son of god, you are a christian, end of story
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Doesn't matter what he claimed.....his life indicates that he was not a Christian. Even if he was baptized as one (and I don't know whether he was or not) that doesn't automatically make you a Christian the rest of your life. You have to walk the walk, and obviously, he did not.
So what's the point?
if someoen believes that jesus christ is the son of god, you are a christian, end of story
What a ridiculous statement.
You aren't a Christian if you don't walk the walk. The very definition of Christian is someone who follows the teachings of Christ.
Originally posted by: randay
was jesus a nazi?
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Doesn't matter what he claimed.....his life indicates that he was not a Christian. Even if he was baptized as one (and I don't know whether he was or not) that doesn't automatically make you a Christian the rest of your life. You have to walk the walk, and obviously, he did not.
So what's the point?
if someoen believes that jesus christ is the son of god, you are a christian, end of story
What a ridiculous statement.
You aren't a Christian if you don't walk the walk. The very definition of Christian is someone who follows the teachings of Christ.
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
He possibly could be a Christian. To God, all sin is equal. We can't really comprehend that as to us, killing people is WAY worse then stealing a bag of chips from the store, and yes it is worse, but either one is a sin, and is impurity, which deserves hell.
Originally posted by: the unknown
Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
He possibly could be a Christian. To God, all sin is equal. We can't really comprehend that as to us, killing people is WAY worse then stealing a bag of chips from the store, and yes it is worse, but either one is a sin, and is impurity, which deserves hell.
Nope. Venial sin and mortal sin. Look it up if you care.
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
I'm not sure whether this thread is intended to be a troll thread or is an attempt at a legitimate discussion. However, as this is ATOT so I know better.
Godwin.
/thread
Originally posted by: SlitheryDee
He said he was in several speeches, but he may have just been an opportunistic liar. He definitely used his people's christian faith to help unite them to his cause whether he believed what he was saying or not.
Originally posted by: IGBT
... when liberals are not trying to pass Nazism off as ?fascism,? they are attempting to pass it off as an extreme form of ?conservatism? and an inexorable byproduct of Christianity. In 2003, on his show Scarborough Country, former congressman and current MSNBC personality Joe Scarborough shed light on a college textbook that grouped Rush Limbaugh and Ronald Reagan with Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini as ?conservatives.?< Now how exactly could Hitler, a man who was a strong supporter of social welfare programs, gun control, animal rights, government funding for the arts and bans against smoking in public get away with being called a ?conservative??
The reason is simple. Liberals are such shameless liars and persistent revisionists that they will malign anyone they disagree with as Hitleresque, from the spastic Iraq war protestors comparing George W. Bush to Hitler to Sen. Dick Durbin comparing American troops to ?Nazis.? Perhaps this is on account of the equivalence of their deep-seated rejection of God to Hitler?s militant rejection of God which led to one of the ugliest mass murders in human history. But wait a minute, wasn?t Hitler a Christian also?
Well if being a Christian means claiming the role of God for one?s self and coercing the subjects of one?s rule to shake off their beliefs in Christ and pledge a new allegiance to the Third Reich, then perhaps Hitler was a Christian. But this certainly doesn?t explain why the Nazis harassed, arrested, tortured and murdered Christian clergymen for espousing their beliefs, or for that matter why during the first five years of the Nazis? rule a majority of concentration camp inmates were Christians, Jews being late arrivals for the most part, nor does it explain why on November 4, 1936, the Nazis ordered the removal of crucifixes from schools in the Oldenburg area on account of the notion that they were ?symbols of superstition.?
Originally posted by: Cerpin Taxt
Originally posted by: IGBT
... when liberals are not trying to pass Nazism off as ?fascism,? they are attempting to pass it off as an extreme form of ?conservatism? and an inexorable byproduct of Christianity. In 2003, on his show Scarborough Country, former congressman and current MSNBC personality Joe Scarborough shed light on a college textbook that grouped Rush Limbaugh and Ronald Reagan with Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini as ?conservatives.?<< Now how exactly could Hitler, a man who was a strong supporter of social welfare programs, gun control, animal rights, government funding for the arts and bans against smoking in public get away with being called a ?conservative??
The reason is simple. Liberals are such shameless liars and persistent revisionists that they will malign anyone they disagree with as Hitleresque, from the spastic Iraq war protestors comparing George W. Bush to Hitler to Sen. Dick Durbin comparing American troops to ?Nazis.? Perhaps this is on account of the equivalence of their deep-seated rejection of God to Hitler?s militant rejection of God which led to one of the ugliest mass murders in human history. But wait a minute, wasn?t Hitler a Christian also?
Well if being a Christian means claiming the role of God for one?s self and coercing the subjects of one?s rule to shake off their beliefs in Christ and pledge a new allegiance to the Third Reich, then perhaps Hitler was a Christian. But this certainly doesn?t explain why the Nazis harassed, arrested, tortured and murdered Christian clergymen for espousing their beliefs, or for that matter why during the first five years of the Nazis? rule a majority of concentration camp inmates were Christians, Jews being late arrivals for the most part, nor does it explain why on November 4, 1936, the Nazis ordered the removal of crucifixes from schools in the Oldenburg area on account of the notion that they were ?symbols of superstition.?
The only thing your post succeeding in demonstrating to me is that you are a fucking whack-job.
Way to backfire on yourself, jerkoff. :thumbsup:
Originally posted by: NSFW
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
I'm not sure whether this thread is intended to be a troll thread or is an attempt at a legitimate discussion. However, as this is ATOT so I know better.
Godwin.
/thread
It was just something I was trying to process. I am finally starting to understand the difference between the church, religion and God. I am also realizing that a lot of institutions are claiming to be doing God's work, but they are doing the opposite. That got me to thinking about how someone could take the Bible and twist it to fit whatever their agenda was. Hitler came to mind and I didn't know if he was a Christian. Wiki said yes and no, so I asked ATOT.
I am well beyond my trolling days.
Originally posted by: So
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: miketheidiot
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Doesn't matter what he claimed.....his life indicates that he was not a Christian. Even if he was baptized as one (and I don't know whether he was or not) that doesn't automatically make you a Christian the rest of your life. You have to walk the walk, and obviously, he did not.
So what's the point?
if someoen believes that jesus christ is the son of god, you are a christian, end of story
What a ridiculous statement.
You aren't a Christian if you don't walk the walk. The very definition of Christian is someone who follows the teachings of Christ.
No, this is just more of the "no true scotsman" fallacy.
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
Originally posted by: NSFW
Originally posted by: MovingTarget
I'm not sure whether this thread is intended to be a troll thread or is an attempt at a legitimate discussion. However, as this is ATOT so I know better.
Godwin.
/thread
It was just something I was trying to process. I am finally starting to understand the difference between the church, religion and God. I am also realizing that a lot of institutions are claiming to be doing God's work, but they are doing the opposite. That got me to thinking about how someone could take the Bible and twist it to fit whatever their agenda was. Hitler came to mind and I didn't know if he was a Christian. Wiki said yes and no, so I asked ATOT.
I am well beyond my trolling days.
Ah. You may have wanted a rational discussion about this, but I've lost faith in AT when it comes to religious topics. The internet never really has discussions of nazis without turning into flamefests. Oh well. Sorry if I sounded like I was implying you were a troll. I get a little knee-jerkish sometimes.![]()
