cybrsage
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2011
- 13,021
- 0
- 0
Only if we assume that people who are unable to prove their eligibility to vote are all legal voters.
That would be a stupid assumption to make, though it appears he is making it.
Only if we assume that people who are unable to prove their eligibility to vote are all legal voters.
Which of course explains why the bills requiring photo ID also make that ID available for free.
So I guess all these fraudulent voters are really good at guessing who will or will not vote?This did not answer the question. The other did not either. You both assume 100% of the people who register to vote actually vote. We all know this is a stupid assumption to make. Only 60% of the population voted.
That's quite a scheme you have going there. Two person team in order to produce one fraudulent vote?So, if a two person team comes in at closing time, with person 1 calling out a name of a non-voting person to person 2 (hey Bill Johnson - how are you? you almost missed voting too, eh?), how do you detect person 2 is not actually Bill Johnson.
I want you to tell me a way to ACTUALLY DETECT in person voting fraud...not some "cause everyone who is registered votes, so they will be caught" type of lie.
Nothing in life is free. Hours at a DMV that's only open during work hours is a high price to pay for the working poor.
So I guess all these fraudulent voters are really good at guessing who will or will not vote?
That's quite a scheme you have going there. Two person team in order to produce one fraudulent vote?
Nothing in life is free. Hours at a DMV that's only open during work hours is a high price to pay for the working poor.
No, your theory is so laughably implausible that we have to revert back to them just guessing right.Guess you did not read the entire quote before replying, eh?
Not easy and not simple and runs the risk of being caught committing a felony.Easy and simple. Something any democrat can do.
Download form and mail paperwork?How do they register to vote?
How do they register to vote?
Only if we assume that people who are unable to prove their eligibility to vote are all legal voters.
You can register to vote in under 5 minutes at voter registration drive booths outside your grocery store, or on your college campus on the way to class, or any number of other ways that takes very little time of effort. Lots of high school civics classes register all of their students to vote who are 18 or older.
Download form and mail paperwork?
No, your theory is so laughably implausible that we have to revert back to them just guessing right.
Not easy and not simple and runs the risk of being caught committing a felony.
Better than pretending a two person team to produce one extra vote qualifies as viable to the point of requiring further government intervention.Ah yes, the "wow, that would work and I cannot argue against it, so I must pretend it is stupid" argument. You do that a lot.
Risk vs. reward, but you know this.Since when did people who want to break the law start caring about the punishment for breaking the law? If your logic were to hold, murder would not exist. Since it does, we know that punishment for crime is not a real deterrent to crime.
Nice try. While you pat yourself on the back, the rest of us laugh at you.Sorry to again show you wrong. Oh wait, I am not sorry for showing you wrong again.
Better than pretending a two person team to produce one extra vote qualifies as 'a plan.'
Risk vs. reward, but you know this.
Nice try. While you pat yourself on the back, the rest of us laugh at you.
Why do you hate the poor and the elderly and want to disenfranchise them? Many of them do not have the Internet at home, nor even a computer!
Why are you so pro-disenfranchisement? How many votes do you demand we suppress with this? We need to remove voter registration unless you can prove it is needed to stop fraudulant votes.
So you think the government should be able to force you to obtain ID in order to vote.So people have to actually go do something...much like they would do to get a photo ID.
Why are you for voter suppression? Why do you want to disenfranchise the people who cannot easily get to a store, are not in college (not everyone is rich and can go) or in high school (why do you hate drop outs?).
The logic is the same. If getting a photo ID is disenfranchisement because you have to actually do something to get it, then voter registration is also disenfranchisement since you have to do something to get it.
You cannot support one and not the other without being a hypocrit.
So you think the government should be able to force you to obtain ID in order to vote.
Why are you for government mandates? Why do you support the nanny state (why do you hate freedom?).
Never claimed that, but you also know this.Ah, so unless one person voting one time can produce multiple votes, it is not actually voter fraud...why are you so stupid?
You seem to be arguing that laws are useless. Is this what you believe?So no one ever killed anyone over an xbox...why are you so stupid?
Because there are other ways to register that were explained to you already.You are confused (as opposed to your normal stupid state). That laughter is directed at you.
You never did explain this:
Why do you hate the poor and the elderly and want to disenfranchise them? Many of them do not have the Internet at home, nor even a computer!
Why are you so pro-disenfranchisement? How many votes do you demand we suppress with this? We need to remove voter registration unless you can prove it is needed to stop fraudulant votes.
Plus they will have to go to a post office or other place that sells stamps so they can mail the paperwork back.
And wouldnt the cost of mailing the letter be considered a poll tax? You do realize those are unconstitutional right?
Never claimed that, but you also know this.
You seem to be arguing that laws are useless. Is this what you believe?
Because there are other ways to register that were explained to you already.
The minimal requirement of registering has been sufficient. I see no rational reason to tighten the requirements for voting.Do you think the government should be able to force you to register in order to vote.
More like you had to stop there because your troll brain couldn't come up with one of your usual delusional arguments, let alone one that holds any water.Why are you for government mandates? Why do you support the nanny state (why do you hate freedom?).
Had to stop there because you got more stupid than normal.
The bolded is not a legal requirement except when enough retards live in a community to elect officials to enact such a stupid law in the first place. The non-retarded people would vote out such hacks before such an abomination could be enacted.Voting is not healthcare. Registering to vote and getting an id to vote are both legal requirements placed upon people in order to vote.
Intelligence may seem stupid to someone such as yourself.Are you really so stupid you cannot understand the difference? Seriously, are you that stupid?
I put 'a plan' in quotes because it is such a stupid idea that it barely qualifies as a plan, not because I wanted to imply that it wasn't a plan to vote fraudulently. This is apparent to anyone with any comprehension ability at all. I forgot you don't have any, so I edited the original statement to dumb it down just for you.You clearly implied it. You said voting fraudlantly one time, when planned out by two people, is not a plan to vote fraudulantly. What logic did you use to create that statement?
Each option may disenfranchise some but when you take all the options available, very few are disenfranchised, if any. Forcing someone to obtain ID does not have enough options to prevent disenfranchisement. You also know this.Criminal laws do not, never have, and are not designed to prevent people from breaking the law. They are designed to punish those who do. It is hoped that people will not want to be punished and therefor follow the law. Obviously (even to an idiot such as yourself), people break laws regardless of the punishment involved.
So are laws useless? Depends on what use you subscribe to them. Laws are useless in cleaning my cat litter pan...but they are quite useful in incarcerating a murderer.
None that do not disenfranchise someone. Show me a way to register which does not disenfranchise anyone.
The "info" you provided was simply wild conspiracy claims about the Kock brothers.
And you are calling me intellectually dishonest? Haha.
Honestly the discourse in P&N has really been downhill lately. The liberals are just totally losing their grip on reality due to Obama's failure freefall.
The 15th, 19th, and 24th amendments make it clear you cannot abridge the right to vote based on race, gender, or age(>18). The fact that we have repeatedly had to pass amendments to guarantee the right to vote to certain people makes it pretty clear that the "right" to vote is abridgeable.
No where is the right to vote without proving your identity guaranteed.