[Video/youtube] FX 8350 Piledriver CPU

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
V

vampirr

Member
Mar 7, 2013
132
0
0
This is the video I found, its a compilation of benchmarks from various site involving AMD Piledriver-"Vishera"(Bulldozer 2.0) FX 8350 32nm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjCrlq2Lf5k

You have repeatedly been warned, so goodbye
Markfw900
Anandtech Moderator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
NTMBK

NTMBK

Lifer
Nov 14, 2011
10,520
6,034
136
scarjo_popcorn.gif
 
Centauri

Centauri

Golden Member
Dec 10, 2002
1,631
56
91
Damn. I wish bags that big were still 99 cents.

Or maybe she's just small enough that the small bag looks big...
 
inf64

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,692
136
Vampirr no offense but why are you posting that? We all know how 8350 performs,it's a solid chip. No need to post a random video on YT when we have like 50 reviews on the internet.
 
FalseChristian

FalseChristian

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
3,322
0
71
C'mon! Let's not spoil his fun. Many people such as myself didn't know about the video on Youtube. Now that I do I say thank you!
 
G

Greenlepricon

Senior member
Aug 1, 2012
468
0
0
Cherry picking indeed, BUT it is a nice summary for things to look for if you need something in particular. I had to find the mute button but otherwise it worked out.
 
Torn Mind

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
12,086
2,774
136
This video was already discussed in a previous thread. It would be nice if you stop treating everyone else like little dumb and ignorant munchkins, but I suspect you have too much hubris in that skull of yous.
 
S

Sleepingforest

Platinum Member
Nov 18, 2012
2,375
0
76
Hey, no need to attack people personally here. Yes, that video is cherry picked to the max, but that's no call for such a strong and personal response. Much better to provide evidence to the contrary.
 
S

svenge

Senior member
Jan 21, 2006
204
1
71
Sleepingforest said:
Hey, no need to attack people personally here. Yes, that video is cherry picked to the max, but that's no call for such a strong and personal response. Much better to provide evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...

Normally that would work, but vampirr doesn't listen to reason. That's why he's been suspended once this month already.
 
guskline

guskline

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2006
5,338
476
126
Funny I have BOTH a 3770k rig and a FX8350 rig see below. The 3770k is faster in most things even though Oc'd to 4.4 while the 8350 is higher at 4.6.
The 8350 is hardly a slouch but simply put the 3770k is faster.

Be VERY careful when you see postings that the FX8350 is faster than the 3770k. I find almost everytime that buried in the fine print is that the FX8350 is OC'd to @4.6Ghz while the 3770k is stock.

I'm willing to run benchies for the doubting Thomas in the crowd.
 
Last edited:
Torn Mind

Torn Mind

Lifer
Nov 25, 2012
12,086
2,774
136
Sleepingforest said:
Hey, no need to attack people personally here. Yes, that video is cherry picked to the max, but that's no call for such a strong and personal response. Much better to provide evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...
My mistake, I thought it was the xsplit video again.


The Bench results corroborate the data shown in the video; some of the results were used in the video. Where there are apps that are strongly thread-hungry, the FX-series wins against the i5, i.e BF3, encoding software, etc. In less thread-hungry apps, the i5 takes the slight lead.


The conclusion in the video is not correct though, since a purchase decision depends on many variables that the buyer draws "utility" from. There is no one rule fits all here. The FX-8350 is certainly an interesting choice for some usage scenarios, especially if you're into thread-hungry apps but don't want to spend 130 dollars more, but at the same time, an FX-8350 system does incur some hidden costs, such as a beefier PSU or making sure the motherboard's VRMs are good enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom