How it started doesn't matter. Martin on top after beating zimmerman restraining him and/or still beating him = OK to shoot in self defense according to law. This is fact, proven by evidence.
Did you ever consider that maybe she is telling the truth? You believe the words of man who we know is a liar...................
Lotus, keep on with your totally made-up accusations, in your continued smear campaign on anyone who supports charging people based ONLY on evidence instead of emotional bias.
Dude who do you think you are?
You keep saying that, yet he is charged with murder 2. It's obvious the state doesn't agree with your interpretation of the law.
Most people are waiting for all of the evidence prior to making a final determination. You and the merry band of bigots from both sides are the only folks that aren't.
I implied no such thing. She refused to talk to police or provide any information to their investigation. It's only your racism making you believe something that isn't there.
I disagree, if she testifies she heard Martin yelling "get off" it's going to pose problems for Zimmerman.
I consider placing an arbitrary ever changing value in jewelry to be emotional bias.
He was also previously charged with assaulting a police officer, how'd that turn out? Being accused, and charged doesn't make someone guilty. It's hilarious watching people that if this case was the other way, and not racially charged would be all over that same it.
Way to completely miss the point. Being charged isn't an indication of guilt, it is however an indication the state disagrees there is no evidence of guilt.
No you infer because she wouldn't speak to SPD that her statements are less truthful. Truth is there are really good reasons for not giving them a statement given the situation at the time.
You imply it was because she was told not to, of which you have no evidence.
You imply she was coached, again no evidence.
Way to completely miss the point. Being charged isn't an indication of guilt, it is however an indication the state disagrees there is no evidence of guilt.
Do we really need to go through this again?
Initial reports from the crumponites is that it was costume flea market jewelry.. But official reports from the school (which the crumptonite crew was able to have pulled ONLY because trayvon is a minor) stated that the jewelry was "real gold, with real diamonds"
Unlike you and the crumponite crew, I am fully willing to change my opinion as facts come out, and this was a perfect example. The jewelry wasn't even a big deal until we got an idea of the true value (especially when combined with the burglary issues in that little neighborhood). I still am curious if miami ever follow up with sanford PD to see if the jewelry matches....
I'm a white American male, formerly liberal who has located my balls. It's a rare thing these days, but let's hope it's a trend.
If certain elements (huge elements which represent the majority) of the black community continue down the path of trying to subvert the justice system in order to have their ignorant, vengeful desires appeased... or try to dismantle the framework of law which allows a person to defend their life and property from Trayvon-types who plague this country with violent crime then you can expect this trend to continue, and accelerate.
If I were a black man, this is the part where you'd be calling me an Uncle Tom. Since I'm white, you'll have to settle for "racist", have at it. Let it all out, but at the end of the day it'll still be the truth which I've said.
Yet, none of the evidence or witness statements corroborate the charges in the affidavit. If the state had any damning evidence this case MOM would have already gotten GZ the best plea deal possible.
What good reason does she have, to not call the police when she 'supposedly' knew trayvon was getting viciously attacked by an unknown man? What person wouldn't call 911 after hearing what she supposedly heart?
It's implied that she was told not to because there's NO other logical reason for her not coming out. The crumptonite crew even outright said that they were 'holding' her...... Right. Again, think with some logic here.
The affidavit clearly did not indicate Murder2 or probable cause.
Ahh perfect the most telling post of all.
" former liberal"
Ideologies are a set of principles one subscribes to they are guided by your worldview. If you are insinuating this case has changed that worldview then you were weak in principle to begin with. In short you were never liberal at all.
The judge at the time thought it did.
Aww man geo, I guess you've been kicked out of the group for not mindlessly following their principles.
The irony of your post is just amazing.. That you can type something like this out and not realize what a disgrace you are to yourself.
No, the judge accepted the affidavit without review.
He was also previously charged with assaulting a police officer, how'd that turn out? Being accused, and charged doesn't make someone guilty. It's hilarious watching people that if this case was the other way, and not racially charged would be all over that same it.
So Lester just stamped it, didn't read it?
I don't buy that at all