• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

U.S. Announces Sanctions Against Iran

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Noobtastic
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: piasabird
Iran is already killing our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, so lets just kill a few Iranian Civilians indiscriminately as payback to show them what their country is doing to civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon. If they dont feel the pain, they will not believe it exists, and they will think America is weak and afraid to attack.

Are you a coward? Iran believes America is too weak to attack. That is why they are emboldened. So we have to attack to call their bluff.

Prove Iran is killing our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

YOU FAIL

You can't prove it that or the Iranian special forces are so great at their job that they never get caught. U.S will be crushed by their skills in a day. Be afraid U.S.

Iranian sniper rifles found in Iraq.
Iranian anti-armor mines found in Iraq.
Iranian missiles used by Hezbollah against Israel.

No proof is good enough for you. You always attempt to mitigate it and say it's not real, that reporters make it up, etc. Honestly I believe that the Iranian youth like America, and could probably run the country well if given a chance. But you, as a young Iranian speaking on their behalf, are NOT helping their cause.

None of your "proofs" would hold up in a legitimate court. Just because something is there doesn't mean a particular party put it there. Show real proof or shut up.


What are you debating? That Iran hasn't contributed a single dime to the insurgency in Iraq? The thousands of recorded documents prove otherwise, zealot. As I've said many times, WHERE DO YOU THINK THE MONEY COMES FROM TO FINANCE THE INSURGENCY?

You think these terrorists have day jobs?

OK, then show me one of those recorded documents.

And our "friends and allies" fund the insurgency in Iraq. That we do know.
 
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: Noobtastic
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: piasabird
Iran is already killing our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, so lets just kill a few Iranian Civilians indiscriminately as payback to show them what their country is doing to civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon. If they dont feel the pain, they will not believe it exists, and they will think America is weak and afraid to attack.

Are you a coward? Iran believes America is too weak to attack. That is why they are emboldened. So we have to attack to call their bluff.

Prove Iran is killing our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

YOU FAIL

You can't prove it that or the Iranian special forces are so great at their job that they never get caught. U.S will be crushed by their skills in a day. Be afraid U.S.

Iranian sniper rifles found in Iraq.
Iranian anti-armor mines found in Iraq.
Iranian missiles used by Hezbollah against Israel.

No proof is good enough for you. You always attempt to mitigate it and say it's not real, that reporters make it up, etc. Honestly I believe that the Iranian youth like America, and could probably run the country well if given a chance. But you, as a young Iranian speaking on their behalf, are NOT helping their cause.

None of your "proofs" would hold up in a legitimate court. Just because something is there doesn't mean a particular party put it there. Show real proof or shut up.


What are you debating? That Iran hasn't contributed a single dime to the insurgency in Iraq? The thousands of recorded documents prove otherwise, zealot. As I've said many times, WHERE DO YOU THINK THE MONEY COMES FROM TO FINANCE THE INSURGENCY?

You think these terrorists have day jobs?

OK, then show me one of those recorded documents.

And our "friends and allies" fund the insurgency in Iraq. That we do know.

Who? Saudi Arabia? Well duh, if that's who you're referring to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...3/AR2007030300609.html

http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchi...6dmslahrellek0.3060114

Iran also contributes to Hezbollah. Who do you honestly think supports the insurgency? Allah?


 
Originally posted by: Noobtastic
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: Noobtastic
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Aimster
Originally posted by: piasabird
Iran is already killing our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, so lets just kill a few Iranian Civilians indiscriminately as payback to show them what their country is doing to civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and Lebanon. If they dont feel the pain, they will not believe it exists, and they will think America is weak and afraid to attack.

Are you a coward? Iran believes America is too weak to attack. That is why they are emboldened. So we have to attack to call their bluff.

Prove Iran is killing our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan.

YOU FAIL

You can't prove it that or the Iranian special forces are so great at their job that they never get caught. U.S will be crushed by their skills in a day. Be afraid U.S.

Iranian sniper rifles found in Iraq.
Iranian anti-armor mines found in Iraq.
Iranian missiles used by Hezbollah against Israel.

No proof is good enough for you. You always attempt to mitigate it and say it's not real, that reporters make it up, etc. Honestly I believe that the Iranian youth like America, and could probably run the country well if given a chance. But you, as a young Iranian speaking on their behalf, are NOT helping their cause.

None of your "proofs" would hold up in a legitimate court. Just because something is there doesn't mean a particular party put it there. Show real proof or shut up.


What are you debating? That Iran hasn't contributed a single dime to the insurgency in Iraq? The thousands of recorded documents prove otherwise, zealot. As I've said many times, WHERE DO YOU THINK THE MONEY COMES FROM TO FINANCE THE INSURGENCY?

You think these terrorists have day jobs?

OK, then show me one of those recorded documents.

And our "friends and allies" fund the insurgency in Iraq. That we do know.

Who? Saudi Arabia? Well duh, if that's who you're referring to.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...3/AR2007030300609.html

http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchi...6dmslahrellek0.3060114

Iran also contributes to Hezbollah. Who do you honestly think supports the insurgency? Allah?

Those are news clippings and propaganda pieces. Show me evidence. Dammit, do you know what an "evidence" is?
 
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Diplomacy and sanctions are better than bombs.

They've ignored the world's strongly worded letters for long enough, so hitting them with sanctions is the next logical step.

Iran cannot, and will not, have nukes. Period.

:laugh:

Funny how you confuse the will of the world with the will of the five permanent members of the Security Council. You're a joke.

Took the words right out of my mouth. I also believe that China and Russia have more to lose from an attack on Iran than gain. They will probably veto any further resolution against Iran. This war might just isolate the US politically from the rest of the world. Britain may support it but it's always been America's neutered poodle.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Narmer
None of your "proofs" would hold up in a legitimate court. Just because something is there doesn't mean a particular party put it there. Show real proof or shut up.

Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militia

Iranian Weapons Found In Iraq

Iraq Weapons - Made In Iran?

Top Iranian Officials Ordering Bombs To Iraq

Iranian Support For Lethal Activities In Iraq


The list goes on and on. Now you put up, or shut up.

None of that proves anything. Just because an Iranian weapon was found in Iraq does not mean they are there at the blessing of the Iranian government. This topic has been discussed ad nauseum and people can't come up with one fucking evidence? Time for them to shut up.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: bamacre
Uhh, no, you didn't.

I asked why Iran wants nukes, and you replied with the fact that they want nukes, as if I had asked IF they wanted nukes.

Iran wants nukes for the same reason every other Islamofascist regime and group of nutjobs wants them: for the utter destruction of their enemies. I really didn't think it was necessary to point that out as it is pretty well known.

Where is your precedent? To my knowledge only one country in the world has ever actually wielded nuclear weapons against another. I am getting sick of this preemptive strike mentality when there is no clear or real threat. First Iraq, now Iran, and you can see how well Iraq turned out.
 
It is a clear violation of the NPT treaty to aid India as the US is doing now- yet I have seen this clear illegality described as being merely a "sensitive position" by the "Paper of Record" in this country.

Few Americans are even aware that Iran has a right to nuclear fuel enrichment under the NPT treaty. In story after story vital and pertinent backround information is simply omitted and the reader is left with the impression that the quite legal activities being discussed are somehow nefarious and dangerous and illegal.

The fact of the matter is that the US is in violation of the NPT treaty by even trying to get sanctions put on Iran- in the complete abscense of any evidence that would suggest they have a nuke weapon program.

The Non-Proliferation Treaty has provided the only strategy that has ever been successful at limiting proliferation. Thanks to incentives prescribed by the Non-Proliferation Treaty, five countries--Belarus, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan--have given up the possession of atomic bombs. Ten other countries--Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, Iraq, Libya, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and Taiwan-- have ended programs to develop nuclear weapons.

North Korea was close to ending its nuclear weapons and long-range missile program in 2000, until George Bush replaced negotiations with threats and insults. Present negotiations may result in the same agreement that was thrown away four years ago­--four years that North Korea used to develop and test an atomic bomb.

The leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has issued a Fatwa saying that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam, and it is the Ayatollah, and not President Ahmadinejad, who is Iran?s ?decider.? But the Ayatollah may well change his mind if he becomes convinced that the security of his nation requires the bomb.

The world, until recently, looked to the United States for leadership. But our leadership depended on the moral stature that the U. S. had achieved through our contributions to world peace, human rights, and international law. We should begin to regain our moral standing by complying, ourselves, with the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty.

 
Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
It is a clear violation of the NPT treaty to aid India as the US is doing now- yet I have seen this clear illegality described as being merely a "sensitive position" by the "Paper of Record" in this country.

Few Americans are even aware that Iran has a right to nuclear fuel enrichment under the NPT treaty. In story after story vital and pertinent backround information is simply omitted and the reader is left with the impression that the quite legal activities being discussed are somehow nefarious and dangerous and illegal.

The fact of the matter is that the US is in violation of the NPT treaty by even trying to get sanctions put on Iran- in the complete abscense of any evidence that would suggest they have a nuke weapon program.

The Non-Proliferation Treaty has provided the only strategy that has ever been successful at limiting proliferation. Thanks to incentives prescribed by the Non-Proliferation Treaty, five countries--Belarus, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan--have given up the possession of atomic bombs. Ten other countries--Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, Iraq, Libya, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and Taiwan-- have ended programs to develop nuclear weapons.

North Korea was close to ending its nuclear weapons and long-range missile program in 2000, until George Bush replaced negotiations with threats and insults. Present negotiations may result in the same agreement that was thrown away four years ago­--four years that North Korea used to develop and test an atomic bomb.

The leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has issued a Fatwa saying that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam, and it is the Ayatollah, and not President Ahmadinejad, who is Iran?s ?decider.? But the Ayatollah may well change his mind if he becomes convinced that the security of his nation requires the bomb.

The world, until recently, looked to the United States for leadership. But our leadership depended on the moral stature that the U. S. had achieved through our contributions to world peace, human rights, and international law. We should begin to regain our moral standing by complying, ourselves, with the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty.

Another excellent post by BMW540I6speed.
 
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Narmer
None of your "proofs" would hold up in a legitimate court. Just because something is there doesn't mean a particular party put it there. Show real proof or shut up.

Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militia

Iranian Weapons Found In Iraq

Iraq Weapons - Made In Iran?

Top Iranian Officials Ordering Bombs To Iraq

Iranian Support For Lethal Activities In Iraq


The list goes on and on. Now you put up, or shut up.

None of that proves anything. Just because an Iranian weapon was found in Iraq does not mean they are there at the blessing of the Iranian government. This topic has been discussed ad nauseum and people can't come up with one fucking evidence? Time for them to shut up.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories...iraq/main2452519.shtml

(CBS/AP) Serial numbers and markings on explosives used in Iraq provide "pretty good" evidence that Iranians are providing either weapons or technology for militants there, Defense Secretary Robert Gates asserted Friday.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/w...-01-30-iraq-iran_x.htm

"We have weapons that we know through serial numbers ? that trace back to Iran," Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno said in an interview with USA TODAY.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02...ast/11cnd-weapons.html

Those officials spread out on two small tables during a news briefing an array of mortar shells and rocket-propelled grenades with visible serial numbers that the officials said link the weapons directly to Iranian arms factories.
 
Originally posted by: BMW540I6speed
It is a clear violation of the NPT treaty to aid India as the US is doing now- yet I have seen this clear illegality described as being merely a "sensitive position" by the "Paper of Record" in this country.

Few Americans are even aware that Iran has a right to nuclear fuel enrichment under the NPT treaty. In story after story vital and pertinent backround information is simply omitted and the reader is left with the impression that the quite legal activities being discussed are somehow nefarious and dangerous and illegal.

The fact of the matter is that the US is in violation of the NPT treaty by even trying to get sanctions put on Iran- in the complete abscense of any evidence that would suggest they have a nuke weapon program.

The Non-Proliferation Treaty has provided the only strategy that has ever been successful at limiting proliferation. Thanks to incentives prescribed by the Non-Proliferation Treaty, five countries--Belarus, Kazakhstan, South Africa, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan--have given up the possession of atomic bombs. Ten other countries--Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, Iraq, Libya, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and Taiwan-- have ended programs to develop nuclear weapons.

North Korea was close to ending its nuclear weapons and long-range missile program in 2000, until George Bush replaced negotiations with threats and insults. Present negotiations may result in the same agreement that was thrown away four years ago­--four years that North Korea used to develop and test an atomic bomb.

The leader of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has issued a Fatwa saying that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam, and it is the Ayatollah, and not President Ahmadinejad, who is Iran?s ?decider.? But the Ayatollah may well change his mind if he becomes convinced that the security of his nation requires the bomb.

The world, until recently, looked to the United States for leadership. But our leadership depended on the moral stature that the U. S. had achieved through our contributions to world peace, human rights, and international law. We should begin to regain our moral standing by complying, ourselves, with the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Treaty.

This is a waste of bandwidth.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: Narmer
None of your "proofs" would hold up in a legitimate court. Just because something is there doesn't mean a particular party put it there. Show real proof or shut up.

Iranian Weapons Arm Iraqi Militia

Iranian Weapons Found In Iraq

Iraq Weapons - Made In Iran?

Top Iranian Officials Ordering Bombs To Iraq

Iranian Support For Lethal Activities In Iraq


The list goes on and on. Now you put up, or shut up.

None of that proves anything. Just because an Iranian weapon was found in Iraq does not mean they are there at the blessing of the Iranian government. This topic has been discussed ad nauseum and people can't come up with one fucking evidence? Time for them to shut up.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories...iraq/main2452519.shtml

(CBS/AP) Serial numbers and markings on explosives used in Iraq provide "pretty good" evidence that Iranians are providing either weapons or technology for militants there, Defense Secretary Robert Gates asserted Friday.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/w...-01-30-iraq-iran_x.htm

"We have weapons that we know through serial numbers ? that trace back to Iran," Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno said in an interview with USA TODAY.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02...ast/11cnd-weapons.html

Those officials spread out on two small tables during a news briefing an array of mortar shells and rocket-propelled grenades with visible serial numbers that the officials said link the weapons directly to Iranian arms factories.

A lot of AK47 with Russian and East European markings were found in Iraq as well, does that mean that the Russians and East Europeans are in cahoots with the insurgents? NO. Try again. We're trying to prove the Iranian government is complicit in the chaos of Iraq, people. Shit, do we have any lawyers on this forum?
 
You'd have to be ignorant and/or ridiculously stubborn to entirely dismiss Iran's active role in the Iraqi violence.

The same is true with Saudi Arabia and their support of various sunni groups in Iraq.

Now, whether or not their obvious role in Iraqi violence is worth going to war over, is another issue altogether... I think that I've made it quite clear that I hope and pray every day that never happens.
 
Originally posted by: palehorse74
You'd have to be ignorant and/or ridiculously stubborn to entirely dismiss Iran's active role in the Iraqi violence. Their motive and means to do so are beyond obvious.

...Or have a partisan political agenda which blinds you to reality, as so many here do.
 
Originally posted by: palehorse74
You'd have to be ignorant and/or ridiculously stubborn to entirely dismiss Iran's active role in the Iraqi violence.

The same is true with Saudi Arabia and their support of various sunni groups in Iraq.

OK. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that they are doing it. Now prove it. Otherwise, STFU.
 
Yes these sanctions will work just as well as those put on Cuba. The regime change in Cuba because of the sanctions we placed on them was just startling ! :roll:
 
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
You'd have to be ignorant and/or ridiculously stubborn to entirely dismiss Iran's active role in the Iraqi violence.

The same is true with Saudi Arabia and their support of various sunni groups in Iraq.

OK. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that they are doing it. Now prove it. Otherwise, STFU.
I dont have to prove it. Proving it to Joe Public is someone else' gig - and not even really necessary.

I only have to help stop it.
 
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: palehorse74
I'm glad the UN makes you laugh - it makes me laugh as well - especially their strongly worded letters. I've never been a fan of theirs...

The UN is a total and complete disgrace.

Then again, those five nations you so readily dismiss are perhaps the five most powerful and advanced nations on earth. Blowing all of them off, for the hell of it, doesnt seem very reasonable or intelligent...

When you have a political agenda, as Narmer does, there is no room for logic or reason.
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: palehorse74
You'd have to be ignorant and/or ridiculously stubborn to entirely dismiss Iran's active role in the Iraqi violence. Their motive and means to do so are beyond obvious.

...Or have a partisan political agenda which blinds you to reality, as so many here do.


Talk about the pot calling the kettle black...

Originally posted by: Uhtrinity
Originally posted by: Pabster
Originally posted by: bamacre
Uhh, no, you didn't.

I asked why Iran wants nukes, and you replied with the fact that they want nukes, as if I had asked IF they wanted nukes.

Iran wants nukes for the same reason every other Islamofascist regime and group of nutjobs wants them: for the utter destruction of their enemies. I really didn't think it was necessary to point that out as it is pretty well known.

Where is your precedent? To my knowledge only one country in the world has ever actually wielded nuclear weapons against another. I am getting sick of this preemptive strike mentality when there is no clear or real threat. First Iraq, now Iran, and you can see how well Iraq turned out.

Awesome post. I like how his logic works with apparantly "well known" 'facts'
 
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Yes these sanctions will work just as well as those put on Cuba. The regime change in Cuba because of the sanctions we placed on them was just startling ! :roll:

Then what do you suggest? Taking the bench like we did post-WWI?

 
Sanctions won't work unless they affect those in power. Examples Cuba and South Africa. Sanctions made Castro stronger, Poor country, what did they have to lose. The elite in South Africa was rich, sanctions gave them a panic attack. Probable Sanction reaction in Iran, "Up your's USA!", a complete opposite reaction.
 
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
You'd have to be ignorant and/or ridiculously stubborn to entirely dismiss Iran's active role in the Iraqi violence.

The same is true with Saudi Arabia and their support of various sunni groups in Iraq.

OK. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that they are doing it. Now prove it. Otherwise, STFU.

There's no burden of proof required to blast a country off the face of the earth.

Fortunately you won't even notice when it happens, since your fingers will still be stuck firmly in your ears going "LALALALALA IRAN IS INNOCENT!"
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
You'd have to be ignorant and/or ridiculously stubborn to entirely dismiss Iran's active role in the Iraqi violence.

The same is true with Saudi Arabia and their support of various sunni groups in Iraq.

OK. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that they are doing it. Now prove it. Otherwise, STFU.

There's no burden of proof required to blast a country off the face of the earth.

Fortunately you won't even notice when it happens, since your fingers will still be stuck firmly in your ears going "LALALALALA IRAN IS INNOCENT!"

He'll probably be over there shaking ahmadineterroristjad's hand again.
 
Harshest sanctions since 1979?

The sanctions in the 80's when we pushed Saddam to invade Iran, and he used WMD on their schoolchildren and a million Iranian casualties occured to be harsher. The 1953 sanctions where the US took their democracy to put a US puppet dictator in power too.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: Narmer
Originally posted by: palehorse74
You'd have to be ignorant and/or ridiculously stubborn to entirely dismiss Iran's active role in the Iraqi violence.

The same is true with Saudi Arabia and their support of various sunni groups in Iraq.

OK. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that they are doing it. Now prove it. Otherwise, STFU.

There's no burden of proof required to blast a country off the face of the earth.

Fortunately you won't even notice when it happens, since your fingers will still be stuck firmly in your ears going "LALALALALA IRAN IS INNOCENT!"


Just a question to all the blamers, if lets say Iran invaded Mexico to steal their oil, killed 100 000 of their people and theratened to bomb you, would you not be inclined to sneak some weapons over the border to help the mexicans?


 
Back
Top