So she was lying just to win votes?
Clinton is a centrist. Not a surprise a lot of the electorate can't figure out what that means.
So she was lying just to win votes?
Better get your b...b...but Clinton, in now, your cult leader won't have any excuses and neither will you in a few more weeks.
I'm not a member of a cult. Haven't we covered this before? I think so. I never said but Clinton about anything. Just commented on someone elses post that was claiming she was against it but didn't really mean it....![]()
I'm not a member of a cult. Haven't we covered this before? I think so. I never said but Clinton about anything. Just commented on someone elses post that was claiming she was against it but didn't really mean it....![]()
Oh but you are and you defend the cult quite well. You are also posting about Hillary in a thread about trump.
B...b... But...
Nope, as usual you are wrong again.
Read the thread. I didn't defend anyone. Just commented on sdifox's comment about Hillary.
Read this thread - https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...-intruders-video-of-the-melee-inside.2487353/
and you will understand 99% = 99.99% from jstorm. And see for yourself how I shamed and humiliated agent in public, again.
As I said before, back then we had the Wright brothers. Now we have to put up with the LYING dumbass brothers (jstorm and agentoof).
so butt hurt. My stats are still good. Guns make you less safe my fearful little man. Sorry I missed another huff and puff from glorious leader of low iq white males.
If Western consumers (US, EU, others) are gone, commie china is dead meat because they have no one to buy their junks. Let them deal with a few hundred million unemployed chinese. Not a pretty picture.
Not sure what that is supposed to tell me. I think it's a great thing that Chinese businesses and government see Africa as an investment with potential from rather than a pathetic child that needs to be fed once in a while when it cries. That's the kind of attitude needed to bring Africa into the developed world.
The Paracel Islands are rightful Chinese clay and were stolen by France, btw. Vietnamese transplants need to be evicted.
so butt hurt. My stats are still good. Guns make you less safe my fearful little man. Sorry I missed another huff and puff from glorious leader of low iq white males.
Let the readers decided. mr. 99.99% = oh just a figure of speech.
No amount of spin can wash away the shame. Just like the readers can see in this thread how you and agent00f would NOT dare to take on the challenge from me. Keep bending over and fold and running your little lying mouths. LOL.
This is based on what exactly?
You just get another question answer.Intentionally wanting your country to crash and burn just so you can say I told you so. As Moonie would say the self-loathing is strong in this one.
Have you ever taken any positive action to try to change the direction of our society or merely going along for the ride and letting others steer the course?
My text is pretty easy to understand, what do you need help with?
Complex agreements are not productive. Why does there need to be one giant agreement that covers everyone, why not a few smaller ones that are more tailored?
And another reason to cover multiple areas in a "giant agreement" is just basic negotiation. We get some of what we want, other countries get some of what they want. If you break it into lots of smaller agreements, you would likely lose some of your bargaining power.You pulled it out of your ass. Got it.
You made a claim that experts can't agree on the meaning of the text and I asked you what where you basing that on, as in, where did you see that the text's meaning had different interpretations.
Also a documents complexity doesn't necessarily dictate its ability to be effective or be easily interpreted. Exhibit A would be the constitution, from which, the largest, most complex government has been created with a branch of said government dedicated to interpreting the document itself.
With Trump working on scrapping TPP on his first day of office, many PacRim countries are looking to PRC's trade deal as an alternative. Just give US's influence in PacRim to PRC why don't you.
/n facepalm.
You pulled it out of your ass. Got it.
You made a claim that experts can't agree on the meaning of the text and I asked you what where you basing that on, as in, where did you see that the text's meaning had different interpretations.
Also a documents complexity doesn't necessarily dictate its ability to be effective or be easily interpreted. Exhibit A would be the constitution, from which, the largest, most complex government has been created with a branch of said government dedicated to interpreting the document itself.
And another reason to cover multiple areas in a "giant agreement" is just basic negotiation. We get some of what we want, other countries get some of what they want. If you break it into lots of smaller agreements, you would likely lose some of your bargaining power.
You realize we are still the world's second largest manufacturer, particularly in non-trinket goods (think high-tech machinery - medical devices, scientific instrumenation, healthcare instrumentation, heavy equipment, pharmaceuticals, etc...) as well as a large agricultural exporter and intellectual property generator. There is more to the vast American economy than just manufacturing.China has a legit interest there. It is in their backyard and they are the world's largest manufacturer. Accept that America is now in era of waning influence, that is to be expected when it has increasingly fewer things to sell to the rest of the world. This is going to continue and it is not necessarily a bad thing for the world (though it is arguably bad for America). I think of it more as a RESULT of the bad thing (America producing less).
China has a legit interest there. It is in their backyard and they are the world's largest manufacturer. Accept that America is now in era of waning influence, that is to be expected when it has increasingly fewer things to sell to the rest of the world. This is going to continue and it is not necessarily a bad thing for the world (though it is arguably bad for America). I think of it more as a RESULT of the bad thing (America producing less).
You realize we are still the world's second largest manufacturer, particularly in non-trinket goods (think high-tech machinery - medical devices, scientific instrumenation, healthcare instrumentation, heavy equipment, pharmaceuticals, etc...) as well as a large agricultural exporter and intellectual property generator. There is more to the vast American economy than just manufacturing.
