Trump: terminate the US Constitution election rules and reinstate me to office

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,914
2,359
126
You are just now discovering he says crazy shit?
Um no. It has come up a few times in previous threads someone calling me out why didnt I ever say anything while he was in office? I did. I proved them wrong by posting quotes. Not sure why its an issue.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: brycejones

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
37,767
18,045
146
Real brave after they've been sucking his ass for the past 6 years. The only problem they have with it now is that he might finally start tanking the party and causing internal schisms and strife (such as throwing a wrench in DeSantis' gears.)

they don't even distance themselves lol

Article 1:
Republicans distanced themselves from former President Donald Trump’s call to ignore the Constitution and the 2020 election results, but shied away from directly criticizing the man who is still their party’s political figurehead.
Former Vice President Mike Pence said the party should focus on the future, hours after Mr. Trump repeated his false claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him and called for a new vote. Speaking on Fox News Sunday, Mr. Pence said that in recent midterms, Republican candidates “focused on re-litigating the last election did not do as well.”

nope can’t do it

article 2:
But Republican Senators arriving to Capitol Hill on Monday sought to distance themselves.
“Kind of at a loss for words,” Senator John Cornyn of Texas told The Independent.
Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana told The Independent he could somewhat understand Mr Trump’s anger after Twitter owner Elon Muskreleased some of the internal discussions that led to the social media giant censoring a New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s laptop.
“I think the document dump demonstrates that, that pre-Musk if you took the Democratic Party and the bad and White House and turn them upside upside down and shook them, the Twitter would fall out of their pocket,” he told The Independent. “It's clear to me that the Democratic Party and Biden will be playing a major role and what was on and was not on Twitter.”

At the same time, Mr Kennedy said that he didn’t agree with Mr Trump’s words.
“The Constitution can be amended. The Constitution can be interpreted, but the Constitution can't be suspended,” he said.
Also on Truth Social, Mr Trump later tried to claim that he never advocate for the termination of the US Constitution, saying his calls to do so were “disinformation and lies.”
Senator Lindsey Graham also said he understood Mr Trump’s anger but told The Independent his remarks about terminating the Constitution or laws was “very inappropriate.”
“He's frustrated because of the, you know, bias in the media and Democrats controlling Twitter and Russia, joke of investigation,” he said. “But the statement was inappropriate and I'm glad to see him clarify.”

lmao, I guess republicans are just redefining the word distance to mean “blame democrats and twitter”

I don't see any reason to click another, it’s obvious blankangst didn’t read these, or he’s just mentally challenged enough to nod along cuz feels
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54 and Pohemi

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,544
7,688
136
they don't even distance themselves lol

Article 1:

nope can’t do it

article 2:

lmao, I guess republicans are just redefining the word distance to mean “blame democrats and twitter”

I don't see any reason to click another, it’s obvious blankangst didn’t read these, or he’s just mentally challenged enough to nod along cuz feels
Most of the rest of the links are basically Republicans distancing themselves from Trump because they might lose the 2016 and 2020 elections.

Notice the deafening silence on what Trump actually said about terminating the Constitution in any of those links.

All he did was google republican distance trump and posted the links to defend the fascists he supports.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
7,544
7,688
136
Just happened on some very, very strong distancing from top Republicans. Some people say it's the strongest distancing.

Republican Senator Mitch McConnell: “Let me just say that anyone seeking the presidency who thinks the Constitution can somehow be suspended or not followed, it seems to me, would have a very hard time being sworn in as President of the United States".

First off, who is McConnell talking about? Can anyone tell from the quote, because all I can see is "anyone", which isn't too specific. I ask because if McConnell is talking about Trump, someone should probably tell McConnell that Trump had a very easy time being sworn in as President of the United States.

Republican Former Vice President Mike Pence: "Anyone who serves in public office, anyone who aspires to serve in public office or serve again in public office should make it clear that they will support and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Hmm, again with the "anyone" talk. Who is Pence talking about here? An illegal immigrant? TV's Soleil Moon Frye?

Republican Senator Mike Rounds: "Anyone who desires to lead our country must commit to protecting the Constitution. They should not threaten to terminate it."

Yet again, some more "anyone" and "they". Who is the anyone? And, didn't Mike Rounds get the message that using pronouns like they means you're a woke progressive terrorist child-raping groomer? Someone needs to talk to Senator Rounds fast before he gets labeled a RINO.

Republican Senator Roy Blunt: “I don’t think there was an escape clause to not defend the Constitution".

A delicious double-negative paired with a fine line about not knowing if it's OK or not to tear up the Constitution. Very strong distancing indeed!

Republican David Joyce: “I will support whoever the Republican nominee is." He continued, "Well, he says a lot of things, but that doesn’t mean that it’s ever going to happen."

Not as strong, but for right-wing authoritarians, it's enough.
 

rommelrommel

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2002
4,382
3,111
146
Just happened on some very, very strong distancing from top Republicans. Some people say it's the strongest distancing.

Republican Senator Mitch McConnell: “Let me just say that anyone seeking the presidency who thinks the Constitution can somehow be suspended or not followed, it seems to me, would have a very hard time being sworn in as President of the United States".

First off, who is McConnell talking about? Can anyone tell from the quote, because all I can see is "anyone", which isn't too specific. I ask because if McConnell is talking about Trump, someone should probably tell McConnell that Trump had a very easy time being sworn in as President of the United States.

Republican Former Vice President Mike Pence: "Anyone who serves in public office, anyone who aspires to serve in public office or serve again in public office should make it clear that they will support and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Hmm, again with the "anyone" talk. Who is Pence talking about here? An illegal immigrant? TV's Soleil Moon Frye?

Republican Senator Mike Rounds: "Anyone who desires to lead our country must commit to protecting the Constitution. They should not threaten to terminate it."

Yet again, some more "anyone" and "they". Who is the anyone? And, didn't Mike Rounds get the message that using pronouns like they means you're a woke progressive terrorist child-raping groomer? Someone needs to talk to Senator Rounds fast before he gets labeled a RINO.

Republican Senator Roy Blunt: “I don’t think there was an escape clause to not defend the Constitution".

A delicious double-negative paired with a fine line about not knowing if it's OK or not to tear up the Constitution. Very strong distancing indeed!

Republican David Joyce: “I will support whoever the Republican nominee is." He continued, "Well, he says a lot of things, but that doesn’t mean that it’s ever going to happen."

Not as strong, but for right-wing authoritarians, it's enough.

Anything short of this is unacceptable:

1670382082754.png
 
  • Haha
Reactions: iRONic and hal2kilo

rommelrommel

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2002
4,382
3,111
146
Sasse is a bitch. Talked a big game but then voted with Trump every time he could have actually used his power to tame the dear leader.

Yeah, I don't disagree. He's on his way out too so of course now he can talk bigger. But it's still a clear rebuke and a decent model for other Republicans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
8,858
11,357
146
Yeah, I don't disagree. He's on his way out too so of course now he can talk bigger. But it's still a clear rebuke and a decent model for other Republicans.
Funny how some of them come out so strongly worded all of a sudden when they decide not to run for re-election. Very few took the risk before a campaign like Liz Cheney did, and she paid the price for her ethics. This is the current GOP and it's voter base. Lean (or run) towards extreme candidates and shrug when their fuckery is shown to the world.

This is how we got TFG.
 

rommelrommel

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2002
4,382
3,111
146
Funny how some of them come out so strongly worded all of a sudden when they decide not to run for re-election. Very few took the risk before a campaign like Liz Cheney did, and she paid the price for her ethics. This is the current GOP and it's voter base. Lean (or run) towards extreme candidates and shrug when their fuckery is shown to the world.

The guy that tried like five different ways to do sedition last time he was in power is totally just joking about sedition, trust me bro.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,188
14,092
136
Was reading Mitt Romney's statement in response to Trump. He says the GOP is the "party of the Constitution."

While it's good that he's saying that Trump is violating an alleged principle of the Republican party, it isn't really a principle of the republican party and never has been, at least not any time in the modern era.

As far back as the 70's and 80's, during the high crime wave, it was always culturally conservative people who supported "victim's rights bills" and endlessly complained that criminals were "getting off on technicalities." "Technicalities" was of course an attempt to trivialize the protections in the 4A, 5A, and 6A because these provisions upset their feels. Yet one of the surest ways to experience an authoritarian police state is to allow the state to incarerate its citizens without the protections of a fair process. It was liberal SCOTUS justices who made those meaningful for the first time in the 1960's. And it was always conservatives who groused about it.

Historically they have cherrypicked the 1A, favoring "free exercise" but giving no credence whatsoever to the establishment clause. Free speech only seems to apply to members of their own tribe, and even then, they try to apply it to private corporations, which has nothing to do with the 1A.

They say they like the 10A, i.e. "state's rights" but that too is a pliable allegiance. Witness the repblicans now calling for a national ban on abortion.

As for the 14A, they just flat out hate it. Some even question its legitimacy.

Republicans are the party of the Constitution much as they are the party of fiscal conservatism. When will people wake up to the fact that there is a difference between rhetoric and substance? It isn't enough just for your pols to use certain words in political speeches.

Maybe Trump saying something like this out loud is exactly what was needed.