Brainonska511
Lifer
- Dec 10, 2005
- 28,638
- 13,737
- 136
Yang is just another in a long line of techbro libertarian clowns. Hope he enjoyed his brief moment in the spotlight before revealing to everyone what a clown he is.
Actually...there are many factors that come into play. Thus it also is likely that Democrats will keep the house.
Mike Turner (R) from Ohio just said a bigly funny: He said that trump has more secrets in his head than in those boxes...lol the guy who ignored daily briefs has a treasure trove of info in his memory!
If Trump illegally removed official records, would he be barred from future office?
There are several laws that could potentially cover such a situation. For example, the Espionage Act, which criminalizes the unauthorized retention of defense-related information that could be used to harm the United States or aid a foreign adversary, carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison per offense.
But the law that has attracted particular attention is Section 2071 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which makes it a crime if someone who has custody of government documents or records “willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies or destroys” them. Section 2071 is not limited to classified information.
If convicted under that law, defendants can be fined up to $2,000 and sentenced to prison for up to three years. In addition, the statute says, if they are currently in a federal office, they “shall forfeit” that office, and — perhaps most importantly, given widespread expectations that Mr. Trump will seek re-election again — they shall “be disqualified from holding” any federal office.
How could any ballot disqualification be challenged?
With an argument that the disqualification provision of Section 2071 is unconstitutional as relates to the presidency.
Article II of the United States Constitution establishes three criteria for presidential eligibility: One must be a “natural born citizen,” at least 35 years old and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.
Since the Constitution prevails when it and a federal statute conflict, the argument would be that Congress lacks the authority to alter that list of criteria — such as by adding a requirement that one has not been convicted of unlawfully taking government documents.
Notably, the Constitution does authorize Congress to render people ineligible to hold federal office as a penalty for convictions in impeachment proceedings. But nothing in the text of the Constitution says lawmakers may use ordinary criminal law to do so.
This is what happens when you stop allowing crazy cultist to spend all day selling flowers and stuff at the airport? It's like some shitty LARP, but they keep involving the rest of us. This can't end well.The Phil G. Qanonsense crowd is applying generous amounts of copium to this...
View attachment 65609
View attachment 65611
View attachment 65610
BAD MELANIA!!!The best wild idea I read about this whole fiasco, it that the call is coming from inside the house. I.E. Someone on the inside has been feeding info the whole time.
The coup de grace would be if a Russian asset was rolling on him. My bad, another Russian asset.
This will probably turn out to be about as effective as when they jailed Hitler, what with how our collective luck has been running.
MAGAs: if they can raid a former President's residence, they can do this to you!
Also MAGAs: Breonna Taylor deserved to be killed in her sleep by LEOs executing a no-knock warrant even though she hadn't committed any crimes.
This will probably turn out to be about as effective as when they jailed Hitler, what with how our collective luck has been running.
One needs to be convicted of a crime by the court of law, even after a raid. However, the FBI does have the right to place Trump under house arrest if they find what they are looking for and it is incriminatory.Then do tell; why didn't they place him in jail?
The Phil G. Qanonsense crowd is applying generous amounts of copium to this...
View attachment 65609
View attachment 65611
View attachment 65610
I think it is super clear that McConnell wants Trump gone from American political life.
People didn't like Hillary because she was a self absorbed conceited person with the personality of a turnip.
I wouldn't vote against anyone because they were a woman or gay. I can think of two women right off the bat I would vote for. I can't think of any gays off the top of my head worthy of a vote.
Trump was ahead of the Generic Democrat category in polls two years before 2020..... and who won 2020?Isn't he already polling ahead of Biden in a hypothetical 2024 rematch?
I wonder how those numbers change after the end result of this.
FBI broke into the safe of a former President? Wow. IF what His Donaldship says is true he is right, this has certainly never been done before. PS-the right to break into the safe would have been had to spelled out in the search warrant-so the need to do so would have had to be spelled out in detail to the judge that issued the search warrant.
This could really be something big.
The documents either:Would Trump be stupid enough (he is stupid, but people around him are not) to take documents that he could sell to our country’s opponents? Espionage? If it were just a few documents, like a prized letter from a tyrant of an isolated nation, I’d figure it was for sentimental reasons. But if it’s boxes and boxes of documents, it’s most likely their contents are damning. He’s not going to take top-secret documents just because he thinks it’s fun to have them, or because he got confused. He’s going to take stuff that he didn’t want getting out.
On the other hand ... If the materials are simply incriminating, full stop, he has no reason to keep them. If the documents can put him in prison and have no other value, he simply burns them. Something else may be going on. . Right now, I'm skeptical that Trump held onto this material solely due to keep it out of other people’s view. Again, he’s a moron, but he’s a cagy veteran when it comes to fraud, crime and covering his tracks. If it’s not useful, and it’s simply incriminating, it’s ashes.
This may end up not being that big of a deal, if it is a big deal - I do think that this is evidence that the DOJ noose is tightening. In particular, it’s increasingly likely that insider goons like Manafort and Meadows are spilling the beans.
We republicans should Defund the FBI the second we take congress back. Make Donal J Trump Chancellor of the USA(Life Appointment) Stack the Supreme Court and strike down every progressive landmark decision made in the last 60 years.