this mta strike in NYC

Page 9 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,841
33,900
136
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?
 

oddyager

Diamond Member
May 21, 2005
3,398
0
76
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: brunswickite
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet

if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k

that does NOT seem so absurd.

They drive a subway or sit in a booth, and collect money.... How much do you expect them to make?? They need to understand that they are easily replaceable.

ur just whining now cuz your company treats you like a piss ant and you cant do anything about it.

My company treats me very well. Though I'm not pulling down top salary, I'm not about to walk out on my boss for not giving me a fat $25K bonus that isn't even justified.
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?
Read the thread. Nobody wants a free ride. I believe (and I'm sure I'm not alone) that they're already making a fair wage. They have the right to ask for more, but if they're denied, they don't have the right to strike. They did. It's greed. It's all in here. Read the thread.
 

oddyager

Diamond Member
May 21, 2005
3,398
0
76
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?

It's not immoral for workers to want better pay. It is absurd for workers to demand beyond logic compensation and it is immoral to cripple the city's transportation by walking out on them.
 

talyn00

Golden Member
Oct 18, 2003
1,666
0
0
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
i dont think they are being greedy at all. 55k is really not alot when you are in the city. Its like the equivalent of 30k most anywhere else in the country.

The union wants:

  • An 8 percent pay raise per year for the next three years
  • A lowering of the retirement age from 55 to 50
  • No additional healthcare contributions from their workers

I'm all for pay raises and fair compensation, and I respect the union's right to negotiate, but those terms are absolutely absurd.

if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k

that does NOT seem so absurd.

but let see, their base pay averages 47k before overtime. And almost certainly they put in overtime, so they most likely get paid more than cops, firefighters, sanitation workers. I would understand cost of living adjustments to their salary, but their demands aren't justified.
 

talyn00

Golden Member
Oct 18, 2003
1,666
0
0
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?

uh you can survive on 47k in NYC, just don't live in manhattan.
 

xospec1alk

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2002
4,329
0
0
Originally posted by: talyn00
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?

uh you can survive on 47k in NYC, just don't live in manhattan.

i bet most of the mta workers don't live in manhattan either...
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: xospec1alk
Originally posted by: talyn00
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?

uh you can survive on 47k in NYC, just don't live in manhattan.

i bet most of the mta workers don't live in manhattan either...

I would be my life savings on it.
 

brunswickite

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
6,386
1
0
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: brunswickite
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
i dont think they are being greedy at all. 55k is really not alot when you are in the city. Its like the equivalent of 30k most anywhere else in the country.

The union wants:

  • An 8 percent pay raise per year for the next three years
  • A lowering of the retirement age from 55 to 50
  • No additional healthcare contributions from their workers

I'm all for pay raises and fair compensation, and I respect the union's right to negotiate, but those terms are absolutely absurd.

if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k

that does NOT seem so absurd.

They drive a subway or sit in a booth, and collect money.... How much do you expect them to make?? They need to understand that they are easily replaceable.

ur just whining now cuz your company treats you like a piss ant and you cant do anything about it.


Do you even know what i do, where I work, or anything about me before you make such a statement?

To get back on topic, anybody with a highschool diploma, with very little skills can drive a subway or sit in a toll booth. How can they demand and expect to get 55k a year with 8 percent raises, when anybody can do their job?

That is the question.

 

oboeguy

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 1999
3,907
0
76
OMG there are also reports of some people going into the subways not aware of a strike.
 

Giscardo

Senior member
May 31, 2000
724
0
0
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
i dont think they are being greedy at all. 55k is really not alot when you are in the city. Its like the equivalent of 30k most anywhere else in the country.

The union wants:

  • An 8 percent pay raise per year for the next three years
  • A lowering of the retirement age from 55 to 50
  • No additional healthcare contributions from their workers

I'm all for pay raises and fair compensation, and I respect the union's right to negotiate, but those terms are absolutely absurd.

if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k

that does NOT seem so absurd.

Name me another employer that would give you an 8 percent annual pay raise and allow you to retire with full pension benefits at age 50.
 

MrChad

Lifer
Aug 22, 2001
13,507
3
81
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?

Who are they going to replace them with?
 

brunswickite

Diamond Member
Jul 23, 2002
6,386
1
0
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
i dont think they are being greedy at all. 55k is really not alot when you are in the city. Its like the equivalent of 30k most anywhere else in the country.

The union wants:

  • An 8 percent pay raise per year for the next three years
  • A lowering of the retirement age from 55 to 50
  • No additional healthcare contributions from their workers

I'm all for pay raises and fair compensation, and I respect the union's right to negotiate, but those terms are absolutely absurd.

if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k

that does NOT seem so absurd.

Name me another employer that would give you an 8 percent annual pay raise and allow you to retire with full pension benefits at age 50.

Throw in free healthcare.
 

totalcommand

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2004
2,487
0
0
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?

Where are they going to hire that many workers in one shot?

Maybe if the MTA actually improved service while raising my fare i would have sympathy for their position. But as it is now, their revenue has gone up, and i don't think anyone, not workers, not me, not the city, is seeing benefits. So fsck the MTA. At least the workers are trying to get some benefit from their moneys.
 

gotsmack

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2001
5,768
0
71
why don;t they just use the federal pay tables for the NYC area.

http://opm.gov/oca/05tables/html/ny.asp

it gets increased every year to match inflation. The past few years it has been going up about 4%

GS-5 pay is ebtry level clerk type work. that is $29857, for the first year. a skilled worker with some sort of certification could get maybe a GS-7 $36983 to start. There are step improvements that are pay increases for seniority.


Someone with a Master degree would only get a GS-9 $45238 if they would start working for the govt today in the NYC area. So the transit workers are getting paid enough.

and most fed workers have to contribute to their own health care. something like $50 every 2 weeks for an excellent PPO (1 person).





 

talyn00

Golden Member
Oct 18, 2003
1,666
0
0
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?

Where are they going to hire that many workers in one shot?

Maybe if the MTA actually improved service while raising my fare i would have sympathy for their position. But as it is now, their revenue has gone up, and i don't think anyone, not workers, not me, not the city, is seeing benefits. So fsck the MTA. At least the workers are trying to get some benefit from their moneys.

what they do with the fares is adding a new subway line, renovating older stations, replacing aging subway cars. The fact is service has been better over the past 10 years or so. (from my perspective)
 

Hacp

Lifer
Jun 8, 2005
13,923
2
81
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?

Where are they going to hire that many workers in one shot?

Maybe if the MTA actually improved service while raising my fare i would have sympathy for their position. But as it is now, their revenue has gone up, and i don't think anyone, not workers, not me, not the city, is seeing benefits. So fsck the MTA. At least the workers are trying to get some benefit from their moneys.


You have obviously succumbed to the brainwashing the transit workers are trying to put into your head. The MTA revenue has gone up because of non-transit related matters. It is because of gains through real estate that are projected to be one time because of low intrest rates that we have seen this year. In the next few years, the MTA will be losing hundreds of millions of dollars. By 2007, it is projected to lose over a billion dollars. Why is it losing so much money? Because the state is not financing it with the cash. It is not the MTA's fault that they are raising fares. It is the fault of the rest of the state, who periodically drains money from the city. The union knows that the MTA is paying tens of millions of dollars in intrest from debts, and is projected to do even more borrowing. It still wants the hefty raises. They say that the MTA spent 1 billion dollars needlessly. Well, 200 million went back to the riders, 700 million for pension payments, and 100 million for security/ subway improvements. That is where all the money went, not needless IMO, unless they don't want their pensions to be funded at all.
 

BD2003

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
16,815
1
81
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?

They certainly could, but who is going to train their replacements? Where are the replacements coming from? What to do when the former union goes absolutely wild?

Not to mention it will probably cost them more in the long run to fire the whole sorry lot of them, and train replacement. If that happened, it would be months before the city would be up and running again.

The plain and simple fact is that the union KNOWS that they not only have the MTA at the balls, but they have the entire CITY at the balls. Most people arent aware of how ridiculously overpaid the workers are. Its just as much bad press for the MTA as it is for the union.

Not that press matters. People dont take the subway cause they want to, they take it cause they have to. There is no other choice.

I'm hoping bloomberg will seriously step in and make it clear that the city itself is going to make them pay very dearly if they dont get back to work.
 

abc

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 1999
3,116
0
0
Originally posted by: rh71

About gaining public support - the union president in his "let's strike" speech basically closed with "let's show the MTA that the TWU (union) does not stand alone". So they are hoping to gain support from us. He also cited the reasons for us to back them should be that they stood for the public in the past asking to keep token booths open, conductors on the trains, and no fare hikes. Gee, I wonder if any of those were self-serving at all... :|


YEAH HA HA.. I caught that... OMG! Can ya dig it???

I clearly remember when they came on the media when the fares were being raised to the now present 2.00 I said to myself MAN WHAT A PLOY.

He's staging this for his own BULLET IN THEIR POCKET FOR THIER FUTURE USE.

It was a no sweat off their back ploy back then to come on the media and say we are protesting the fare raise etc. Because it was low risk to them, no MTA repercussions, and whether the Transit Workers said anything about the fare hikes had just a little final outcome to the final fare price as did the customers themselves!


I was balling....he's asking this morning for the public to bear with them and stand by them as they did for us, during the fare hikes.

Uh huh...? You asking us to support something that you're doing which is illegal.

What did you do that was illegal, for 'us'???

Ha ha. If you walked out on the job to protest the fare hikes, wink wink... now that would be an 'eye for an eye'.

This MTA WU stuff should be on Leno.
 

Torghn

Platinum Member
Mar 21, 2001
2,171
0
76
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?

Who are they going to replace them with?


They should start highering now. Also they should throw the union leaders in jail. They are breaking the law after all.
 

talyn00

Golden Member
Oct 18, 2003
1,666
0
0
Originally posted by: Torghn
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?

Who are they going to replace them with?


They should start hiring now. Also they should throw the union leaders in jail. They are breaking the law after all.

fixed your spelling mistake.

they can hire other transit workers from other municipalities.
 

xospec1alk

Diamond Member
Mar 4, 2002
4,329
0
0
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.

EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?

Where are they going to hire that many workers in one shot?

Maybe if the MTA actually improved service while raising my fare i would have sympathy for their position. But as it is now, their revenue has gone up, and i don't think anyone, not workers, not me, not the city, is seeing benefits. So fsck the MTA. At least the workers are trying to get some benefit from their moneys.

maybe those fare hikes are going to those pensions that start at 55?
 

abc

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 1999
3,116
0
0
This strike... could possibly be hurting a lot of the 'little' guys than big NYC companies.

Now of course anywhere, there are more small businesses than there are large.

All the mom/pop shops, stores, or small companies that can't open up, or can but don't have their usual customers, and the people that are not salary based but work hourly.


This strike is not going to hit as many big players as it may have since the last strike 20+ yrs go.

It's big players that make noise, but i dont think they're affected like the illegal strikers hope.

NYC is financial sector based, among other things of course... Financial companies, most of the revenue producer employees live inside Manhattan, so they got to work as they normally do, taxi or walk. No business affected for the Markets, really. The Non revenue producer employees have technology to remote from home since the financial sector invested heavily for this stuff after 9/11, and they pay for car pool all over the city for their workers.

 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
Originally posted by: oboeguy
OMG there are also reports of some people going into the subways not aware of a strike.
I saw a whole bunch of tourists coming out of a station by Columbus Circle looking very confused. :laugh: