Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: brunswickite
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k
that does NOT seem so absurd.
They drive a subway or sit in a booth, and collect money.... How much do you expect them to make?? They need to understand that they are easily replaceable.
ur just whining now cuz your company treats you like a piss ant and you cant do anything about it.
Read the thread. Nobody wants a free ride. I believe (and I'm sure I'm not alone) that they're already making a fair wage. They have the right to ask for more, but if they're denied, they don't have the right to strike. They did. It's greed. It's all in here. Read the thread.Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
i dont think they are being greedy at all. 55k is really not alot when you are in the city. Its like the equivalent of 30k most anywhere else in the country.
The union wants:
- An 8 percent pay raise per year for the next three years
- A lowering of the retirement age from 55 to 50
- No additional healthcare contributions from their workers
I'm all for pay raises and fair compensation, and I respect the union's right to negotiate, but those terms are absolutely absurd.
if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k
that does NOT seem so absurd.
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?
Originally posted by: talyn00
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?
uh you can survive on 47k in NYC, just don't live in manhattan.
Originally posted by: xospec1alk
Originally posted by: talyn00
Originally posted by: ironwing
A bunch of people here seem to want a free ride. You want a ride? Pay the ferryman. Is 47k a living wage in Manhatten? I don't get the moralizing on the part of folks opposed to the strike. Is it immoral for workers to want better pay? Why?
uh you can survive on 47k in NYC, just don't live in manhattan.
i bet most of the mta workers don't live in manhattan either...
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: brunswickite
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
i dont think they are being greedy at all. 55k is really not alot when you are in the city. Its like the equivalent of 30k most anywhere else in the country.
The union wants:
- An 8 percent pay raise per year for the next three years
- A lowering of the retirement age from 55 to 50
- No additional healthcare contributions from their workers
I'm all for pay raises and fair compensation, and I respect the union's right to negotiate, but those terms are absolutely absurd.
if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k
that does NOT seem so absurd.
They drive a subway or sit in a booth, and collect money.... How much do you expect them to make?? They need to understand that they are easily replaceable.
ur just whining now cuz your company treats you like a piss ant and you cant do anything about it.
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
i dont think they are being greedy at all. 55k is really not alot when you are in the city. Its like the equivalent of 30k most anywhere else in the country.
The union wants:
- An 8 percent pay raise per year for the next three years
- A lowering of the retirement age from 55 to 50
- No additional healthcare contributions from their workers
I'm all for pay raises and fair compensation, and I respect the union's right to negotiate, but those terms are absolutely absurd.
if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k
that does NOT seem so absurd.
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.
EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: gigapet
i dont think they are being greedy at all. 55k is really not alot when you are in the city. Its like the equivalent of 30k most anywhere else in the country.
The union wants:
- An 8 percent pay raise per year for the next three years
- A lowering of the retirement age from 55 to 50
- No additional healthcare contributions from their workers
I'm all for pay raises and fair compensation, and I respect the union's right to negotiate, but those terms are absolutely absurd.
if the averager worker is making 30-35k now after the raises the average will be 37k-45k
that does NOT seem so absurd.
Name me another employer that would give you an 8 percent annual pay raise and allow you to retire with full pension benefits at age 50.
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.
EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.
EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
Where are they going to hire that many workers in one shot?
Maybe if the MTA actually improved service while raising my fare i would have sympathy for their position. But as it is now, their revenue has gone up, and i don't think anyone, not workers, not me, not the city, is seeing benefits. So fsck the MTA. At least the workers are trying to get some benefit from their moneys.
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.
EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
Where are they going to hire that many workers in one shot?
Maybe if the MTA actually improved service while raising my fare i would have sympathy for their position. But as it is now, their revenue has gone up, and i don't think anyone, not workers, not me, not the city, is seeing benefits. So fsck the MTA. At least the workers are trying to get some benefit from their moneys.
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.
EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
Originally posted by: rh71
About gaining public support - the union president in his "let's strike" speech basically closed with "let's show the MTA that the TWU (union) does not stand alone". So they are hoping to gain support from us. He also cited the reasons for us to back them should be that they stood for the public in the past asking to keep token booths open, conductors on the trains, and no fare hikes. Gee, I wonder if any of those were self-serving at all... :|
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.
EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
Who are they going to replace them with?
Originally posted by: Torghn
Originally posted by: MrChad
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.
EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
Who are they going to replace them with?
They should start hiring now. Also they should throw the union leaders in jail. They are breaking the law after all.
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Originally posted by: Giscardo
I carpooled with a coworker to get to work. Out of my entire floor (~70 people) only four people are in the office today.
EDIT: Considering the strike is illegal, why can't they just fire the workers?
Where are they going to hire that many workers in one shot?
Maybe if the MTA actually improved service while raising my fare i would have sympathy for their position. But as it is now, their revenue has gone up, and i don't think anyone, not workers, not me, not the city, is seeing benefits. So fsck the MTA. At least the workers are trying to get some benefit from their moneys.
I saw a whole bunch of tourists coming out of a station by Columbus Circle looking very confused. :laugh:Originally posted by: oboeguy
OMG there are also reports of some people going into the subways not aware of a strike.