-
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
The Trump Tariffs thread
Page 185 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
That’s another 10%
Brainonska511
Lifer
Not just a piss baby, but constantly undermining any legal arguments to be able to implement these absolutely arbitrary tariffs. Can't wait to see how Alito and Thomas twist themselves into pretzels to ignore blantantly obvious facts.
DaaQ
Platinum Member
I pretty much doubt they can fire up the Rouge Steel Complex again. If it is even there still.
Yea USS is, I am pretty sure, no longer on I94 either. (U S Steel)
Would be good for MI to get those steel factories back. I fear it is too late. (I know)
Over and over again, Trump has asserted the right to impose tariffs on a whim. That makes it harder and harder for his six lapdogs on the Supreme Court to defend his decisions based on any fragment of legal authority. Will they stick with the "National Security" canard ruling when Trump continually imposes tariffs because his fee fee's are hurt. His minions among the six SCOTUS conservatives are going to hell and back in order to find some excuse to declare that he's operating within the scope of any statutory power. And he keeps on undercutting them by claiming that he has absolute authority to impose tariffs based on nothing more than whims.
He decided to impose additional tariffs on Brazil, because his pal and fellow insurrectionist Bolsonaro was subject to process of law.
He decided to impose additional tariffs on India because India was buying Russian oil (without mentioning all the other purchasers of Russian petrochemicals).
Now he's added 10% to Canada because his fragile ego was offended by an ad. When all he is doing is creating an embargo and it will isolate the United States.
SCOTUS conservatives denying the facts that are flying in their faces? Trump announces higher tariff rates on key ally over latest "hostile act". Hostile act my ass. It was a fucking ad!
Anyone who has ever known/lived with a narcissist knows they ALWAYS destroy their friendships and alliances. ALWAYS! This idiot needs to be locked away in a mental institution.
He also never got over this:
That poor idiot thinks that will vote again in his life XD
This is gonna end badly, will find a way to commit fraud and well... you know what's next.
Along with his fee fee's being the "hostile act"
This wasn't an ad by the Government of Canada it was an ad released by the Province of Ontario. There is nothing "fraudulent" about the ad. It uses President Reagan's own words. All Trump's theatrics have done is amplify the ad ensuring millions of Americans see it.
Trump has been insulting and degrading Canada his term to date. "Beat those Commies up North" is what he posts before the baseball game? Really? That is an American president? More like a 2 year old
toddler.
No wonder his parents hated him.
Brainonska511
Lifer
Get the fuck out of here with that "I'm also a farmer" bit. (Nevermind that "being a farmer" today is nothing like "being a farmer" circa 1920; the latter of which is what lots of people seem to think of when they hear farmer, and not big businessman with large land holdings.)
From his Wiki:
WelshBloke
Lifer
I mean they absolutely are! That guy will blurt out anything to anyone if he feels he needs to prop up his ego, he's about to start a war in South America because of his feels...
So now the Reagan Foundation is shilling for Dear Leader. Saint Ronnie is rolling in his grave. He would be called a RINO today and Jesus wouldn't be let into the Country today!
The Reagan Foundation said that they created an ad campaign using selective audio and video of President Ronald Reagan. The ad misrepresents the Presidential Radio Address,' and 'did not seek nor receive permission to use and edit the remarks.
Nothing in the ad was out of context. Second, you don't need permission to air public comments. The Reagan Foundation does not own the public domain video of Reagan's presidential address. No one needs their permission for anything. There were no restrictions on the access to, or use of the speech. It's right there on the YouTube page. Reagan's radio broadcast is very clear, tariffs are a disaster, which is what Trump himself doesn't want to hear along with his flock of sheep.
Lashing out and screaming “You made me do this” is his entire shtick.
The Reagan Foundation said that they created an ad campaign using selective audio and video of President Ronald Reagan. The ad misrepresents the Presidential Radio Address,' and 'did not seek nor receive permission to use and edit the remarks.
Nothing in the ad was out of context. Second, you don't need permission to air public comments. The Reagan Foundation does not own the public domain video of Reagan's presidential address. No one needs their permission for anything. There were no restrictions on the access to, or use of the speech. It's right there on the YouTube page. Reagan's radio broadcast is very clear, tariffs are a disaster, which is what Trump himself doesn't want to hear along with his flock of sheep.
Lashing out and screaming “You made me do this” is his entire shtick.
sdifox
No Lifer
Maybe the Soros connection should be repeated to the MAGA to get him fired xd
brycejones
Lifer
Quick someone tell Loomer.
Jaskalas
Lifer
So the rich bitch owns farmers? In the 1800s, that scum bag would say he picked cotton too.
Brainonska511
Lifer
He probably owns a farm to use for some tax scheme, since there are some weird rules there that some rich fucks like to abuse to run up the financial scoreboard.
hal2kilo
Lifer
Oh so our master liberal plan is working out. The Soros mole. /s
NWRMidnight
Diamond Member
Yes I did, and he means exactly what Canada says in their ad. Trump is the one lying.
Maybe I need to edit my other post, as I was refering to Trump in it.
Lol!, so multimillionaire Bessent "feels your pain"? Harvesting crops in a suit must be painful. A landlord who gets paid regardless of whether his tenants can survive or not. An absentee landlord, not a farmer. Wasn't he just a used car salesman last week? Why hasn’t the invisible hand of the free market saved American farmers? Bessant is also largely responsible for all of this. No doubt that he will be buying up bankrupt farmer properties.
Last edited:
hal2kilo
Lifer
Just another liquidator billionaire.
The plan is... there is no plan.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/us/politics/trump-china-trade-deal-talks.html
View article without paywall
removepaywalls.com
nakedfrog
No Lifer
iRONic
Diamond Member
Shitlol
They ate your face… your cattle are just the dessert!
“Gajdzik points out, this move would be just the latest in a series of actions through Trump’s presidency that have negatively impacted the farming industry. Pork and soybean farmers suffered from declines in international sales during Trump’s first term, largely caused by retaliatory tariffs and boycotts from China. It’s an uphill battle they’re facing once again in Trump’s second term, as a byproduct of an escalating trade war. Farmers also suffered over tariffs placed on Canada, which dramatically increased the cost of potash, a widely-used fertilizer in the agriculture industry.
“A lot of rural America, here in Kentucky, a lot of the farmers, you know they supported Trump in all of his elections. It’s disappointing to see how he has handled these situations,” Gajdzik said. “It’s kind of a gut punch, or a slap in the face almost that he’s doing this to us. I don’t think we foresaw him treating the agriculture community this way.”
www.wave3.com
They ate your face… your cattle are just the dessert!
“Gajdzik points out, this move would be just the latest in a series of actions through Trump’s presidency that have negatively impacted the farming industry. Pork and soybean farmers suffered from declines in international sales during Trump’s first term, largely caused by retaliatory tariffs and boycotts from China. It’s an uphill battle they’re facing once again in Trump’s second term, as a byproduct of an escalating trade war. Farmers also suffered over tariffs placed on Canada, which dramatically increased the cost of potash, a widely-used fertilizer in the agriculture industry.
“A lot of rural America, here in Kentucky, a lot of the farmers, you know they supported Trump in all of his elections. It’s disappointing to see how he has handled these situations,” Gajdzik said. “It’s kind of a gut punch, or a slap in the face almost that he’s doing this to us. I don’t think we foresaw him treating the agriculture community this way.”
“A slap in the face”: Kentucky farmers react to Trump’s foreign beef proposal
Kentucky farmers are reacting to a proposal made by the Trump administration this week to quadruple the amount of beef imports from Argentina.
nickqt
Diamond Member
When forced to choose between their wallets or their bigotry, they'll choose their bigotry each and every time. Don't take my word for it, just ask one of them. They got this the last time he was President and they lined up and voted for him again. I'm glad they're getting exactly what they voted for. Democracy in action.Shitlol
They ate your face… your cattle are just the dessert!
“Gajdzik points out, this move would be just the latest in a series of actions through Trump’s presidency that have negatively impacted the farming industry. Pork and soybean farmers suffered from declines in international sales during Trump’s first term, largely caused by retaliatory tariffs and boycotts from China. It’s an uphill battle they’re facing once again in Trump’s second term, as a byproduct of an escalating trade war. Farmers also suffered over tariffs placed on Canada, which dramatically increased the cost of potash, a widely-used fertilizer in the agriculture industry.
“A lot of rural America, here in Kentucky, a lot of the farmers, you know they supported Trump in all of his elections. It’s disappointing to see how he has handled these situations,” Gajdzik said. “It’s kind of a gut punch, or a slap in the face almost that he’s doing this to us. I don’t think we foresaw him treating the agriculture community this way.”
“A slap in the face”: Kentucky farmers react to Trump’s foreign beef proposal
Kentucky farmers are reacting to a proposal made by the Trump administration this week to quadruple the amount of beef imports from Argentina.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 24K
-
-
