"For accidents"? Its there as a preventative measure, with the motivation of why there potentially being a collision not even factoring in at all. It doesn't matter, and get this, it benefits both "accidents" and intentional situations because of it. Kinda like regulating murder weapons, it doesn't matter what your motivation for shooting would be, shooting inherently puts people in danger. This is the most basic of basic common sense and yet you gun nuts can't even get that. And so, because of it you psychopaths have decided its better to force everyone to have to risk having to deal with your "accidents" and intentional acts of assholery.
No it doesn't. God you gun nuts are fucking willfully stupid assholes. Can you be honest even a tiny bit? That's rhetorical because of course you can't because you've chosen to disregard all sense in order to prop up your fetishism of murder weapons. That you have to constantly make up bullshit arguments to argue against is what is actually silly but you're too goddamn stupid to even have that level of self awareness.
Not sure why I bothered responding to your garbage ass formulaic bullshit argument (gee, we've never seen gun nuts try to say "well what about cars they can kill people too!" because you apparently are too goddamn stupid to notice that we regulate the hell out of the car industry, including both the object and the people using the object, for safety reasons, but can't seem to understand why, that being quite successful, people with sense realized it would work if we apply it to other markets, like say machinery designed solely for killing).
But hey, maybe eventually you can provide a legit real world use for a suppressor? We know you won't though because you're just full of shit, like all the other gun nuts.