THE MATRIX: DECODED - I plagerized this! :)

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

theNEOone

Diamond Member
Apr 22, 2001
5,745
4
81
Originally posted by: element®
Originally posted by: AgaBooga
Originally posted by: GtPrOjEcTX
Originally posted by: cmdavid
Originally posted by: shabby
Originally posted by: warcrow
Someone please read it. I put alot of work into it :(

Really? Looks like you just copy and pasted it and are taking credit for it, thats just sad
rolleye.gif
have you thought that maybe that could be him? give him a break..
It is NOT him. As warcrow stated in the original post, "I just saw Revolutions for the first time yestreday and now I can give my two cents. "

He saw it for the first time on 4/9/2004. The post on the matrix forums was on 11/05/2003.
QED, thus it is proven, warcrow is a plagiarizer.

ouch

ownt!
hahah, i wonder if he's lying about his car and fiancee too.


=|
 

Qacer

Platinum Member
Apr 5, 2001
2,721
1
91
Very interesting!
You don't need cliff notes if you are really interested in the subject. Can anyone say ADD?

:D
 

Siddhartha

Lifer
Oct 17, 1999
12,505
3
81
Originally posted by: Queasy
No where in all these explanations have I been given a reason for the laughably bad rave in the Zion temple in Reloaded. :p

I thought the rave sceen showed people celebrating life and thumbing their noses at fear.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
AWESOME post...wow that makes a lot of things clear to me...i dunno what else to say besides good job and i agree! :)
 

MournSanity

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2002
3,126
0
0
Man, I can't believe you plagerized this. As a writer, I think it's the worst possible thing a person can do. Shame on you warcrow, I hope you never show your face on ATOT after this.
 

Kipper

Diamond Member
Feb 18, 2000
7,366
0
0
The movies weren't even that great, aside from the first one, and they tried to be overly-philosophical. People kept on saying how the dialogue with the Architect was so deep, when he really didn't even say anything at all - just threw around big words and complicated sentence structure.
 

warcrow

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
11,078
11
81
Originally posted by: shabby
Originally posted by: warcrow
Someone please read it. I put alot of work into it :(

Really? Looks like you just copy and pasted it and are taking credit for it, thats just sad
rolleye.gif

You're right, I did copy and paste it. I wrote it up in Word before doing this (mainly so I could print it out and read to to my fiancee and bounce my ideas off of her over coffee). Ugh, image if my browser crashed in the middle of typing it :( Atleast Word saves.
 

warcrow

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
11,078
11
81
BTW

"...within are the results of reading through too many forums from various websites, reading interviews from the actors, and one or two interviews from the Wachowski bros, and of course watching all 3 movies..."

I said where i got it. I never said I wrote all of this. :-/
 

SackOfAllTrades

Diamond Member
May 7, 2000
4,040
2
0
Originally posted by: warcrow
Originally posted by: shabby
Originally posted by: warcrow
Someone please read it. I put alot of work into it :(

Really? Looks like you just copy and pasted it and are taking credit for it, thats just sad
rolleye.gif

You're right, I did copy and paste it. I wrote it up in Word before doing this (mainly so I could print it out and read to to my fiancee and bounce my ideas off of her over coffee). Ugh, image if my browser crashed in the middle of typing it :( Atleast Word saves.

have you even read through this whole thread?
 

Mermaidman

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2003
7,987
93
91
On the whole, your explanation seems sensible and is a good Cliffs Notes for the trilogy. I only read it once, and quickly. Only niggling problems I had were the few times you said ". . . as explained above."
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: studguy1
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: theNEOone
well i think your interpretation of neo's purpose is off, and i'm going primarily off the quote you posted "Your life is the sum of a remainder of an unbalanced equation inherent to the programming of the Matrix." remember that the matrix is a program whose purpose is to "enslave the minds of humans." however, for all its inginuity it's not a perfect program. its fundamental flaw is that it attempts to model the human mind by a series of equations. because the machines don't completely understand humans, this task is by no means easy. therefore, the matrix is flawed. the architect, however, wants to make the matrix program perfect......"his purpose is to balance the equation." so, he created the one. the "sum remainder..." is all the mistakes that the matrix couldn't grasp = neo "collects" these imperfections and reloads the new code when the time is right, so the next iteration of the matrix is slightly more perfected.



=|

Why did you attack his spelling when you made numerous grammatical and spelling flaws in your own post?


When did he attack his spelling ???
Originally posted by: theNEOone
ok, when you start out a 30 page paper with "It's about what was interpited" i refuse to finish.


=|

Thanks Howard. Too bad this guy plagiarized though. :(

 

esun

Platinum Member
Nov 12, 2001
2,214
0
0
That was a great and very detailed interpretation. I personally disliked both the 2nd and 3rd Matrix movies, but damn if that didn't give them some more credibility. I'm saving it right now...
 

Legendary

Diamond Member
Jan 22, 2002
7,019
1
0
Damn man you plagiarized that? I think you've collectively lost the respect of many people here.
 

Yossarian

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
18,010
1
81
Originally posted by: warcrow
You're right, I did copy and paste it. I wrote it up in Word before doing this (mainly so I could print it out and read to to my fiancee and bounce my ideas off of her over coffee). Ugh, image if my browser crashed in the middle of typing it :( Atleast Word saves.

lol continuing to lie after it being proved to have been plagiarized. priceless.
 

SackOfAllTrades

Diamond Member
May 7, 2000
4,040
2
0
Originally posted by: warcrow
I love how people here arnt even reading the disclaimer! LOL

I love how people edit their disclaimers at the last second to BACKPEDAL on making an ass out of themselves! LOL
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: warcrow
I love how people here arnt even reading the disclaimer! LOL

A disclaimer doesn't change the fact that you plagiarized.
 

anxi80

Lifer
Jul 7, 2002
12,294
2
0
couldve just said screw the disclaimer and just linked to the original thread/page where it came from. couldve saved yourself from writing all that stuff at the end of your disclaimer. the way it was worded and put, made it seem as if it was your original creation. couldve been something like this:

found something on another board. keep in mind, im not here to discuss how good/bad/craptacular this trilogy is. just an interesting read. [link to the site here]

simple as that!
 

warcrow

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
11,078
11
81
I told you guys where I got this from. "...here within are the results of reading through too many forums from various websites, reading interviews from the actors, and one or two interviews from the Wachowski bros, and of course watching all 3 movies." <shrug> I don't know what you guys are look for. I edited the original message to bold and underline that specifically. If you read what the original post says and mine, then you should, there is differences especially at the end. I changed the info on what I read in interviews, articles, and some other forums (like I said). But I can understand how you see this, though. But I think a little to quick to point the finger, you should first reread what I cleaned up what was originally said. But it really makes no difference to me.

Want to call this plagerizing? Ok, fine. I don't care. I just want to get on to the discussion. Thats what I did this for.
 

warcrow

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
11,078
11
81
Originally posted by: anxi80
couldve just said screw the disclaimer and just linked to the original thread/page where it came from. couldve saved yourself from writing all that stuff at the end of your disclaimer. the way it was worded and put, made it seem as if it was your original creation. couldve been something like this:

found something on another board. keep in mind, im not here to discuss how good/bad/craptacular this trilogy is. just an interesting read. [link to the site here]

simple as that!

Nope, would not have worked because it was changed. I should have posted the original thread though. I'll do tha tnow, thanks for the contructive advise anxi80.
 

ndee

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
12,680
1
0
totally owned and then saying he wrote it in Word to read it to his GF ROTFL.... whatta loser.
 

warcrow

Lifer
Jan 12, 2004
11,078
11
81
Originally posted by: ndee
totally owned and then saying he wrote it in Word to read it to his GF ROTFL.... whatta loser.

I did. I cute and pasted info, then rewrote about 1/2 of it with better info. And....?