Starbuck1975
Lifer
- Jan 6, 2005
- 14,698
- 1,909
- 126
In the context of the times, it most likely felt futile.There were copiers in 1993, why didn't she keep a copy of complaint for herself?
In the context of the times, it most likely felt futile.There were copiers in 1993, why didn't she keep a copy of complaint for herself?
Neither interview proves anything.I think Reade is doing an interview Sunday. I'm assuming it will be Fox. Let see if questioner does as good a job as Mika
I know you're desperate to #bothsides everything as that's your MO so why aren't you desperately trying to #bothsides this? Hold Biden to the exact same standard that Trump is! #Bothsides to your heart's content! This should be the best day ever for you as remember, you aren't concern trolling Democrats, you just want consistency.The comparison is the behavior of both political parties within the context of how they’ve flip flopped out of political convenience.
No but her ninja editing doesn't help her case at all, of course you'll ignore that.Neither interview proves anything.
So to be clear your argument is that she kept her other employment documents from her time with Biden but decided that the document which contained the details of what she describes as the turning point in her life wasn't worth keeping?In the context of the times, it most likely felt futile.
No but her ninja editing doesn't help her case at all, of course you'll ignore that.
Her edits changed nothing.
If the national archives unearth no complaint would this cause you to re-evaluate her credibility?
Not futile enough to file a report, but futile enough to make a copy?In the context of the times, it most likely felt futile.
Haha, I am 0% shocked.
No but her ninja editing doesn't help her case at all, of course you'll ignore that.
Nothing else? What if the edits are false? They do nothing but hinder the honesty of her allegations.Seriously, explain what her Edits changed. They add Details, nothing else.
If it corroborated other things she has said it would! It would also presumably include documents relating to their investigation and evaluation of the complaint and its credibility. Surely you agree it is suspicious that the formal complaint she said she filed is missing and no one remembers itWould it change Yours if one was found? We have already been down the road where Objection after Objection had been verified on her behalf. 4 Separate Persons have gone on the record that she mentioned it to them, her Mom's phone call to Larry King, how many confirmations are required?.
Nothing else? What if the edits are false? They do nothing but hinder the honesty of her allegations.
Now you're just being silly, if you can't understand how the edits make the case much worse sounding then I don't know what to tell you. As to which ones are false...maybe all of them or none of them, only two people know what really if anything happened.Which ones are False? Which ones change her Allegation? Is the Edit the objection or the Meaning?
If it corroborated other things she has said it would! It would also presumably include documents relating to their investigation and evaluation of the complaint and its credibility. Surely you agree it is suspicious that the formal complaint she said she filed is missing and no one remembers it
The mom’s phone call to Larry King is probably something you will want to avoid. The caller said they didn’t want to come forward about the ‘problems’ ‘out of respect for the senator’. It is unlikely that you don’t do something because you respect your rapist too much.
Remember, I’m not immune to evidence like you are. I’m open to changing my mind, that’s why my evaluation of Reade has become worse and worse, after all.
Now you're just being silly, if you can't understand how the edits make the case much worse sounding then I don't know what to tell you. As to which ones are false...maybe all of them or none of them, only two people know what really if anything happened.
Not worth the time, you will never be convinced by any evidence that comes out, unless it's put out by a Bro.You seem not to know what to tell me at all. Give it a try.
Are you fucking kidding me.There is nothing inconsistent with her Allegations and still respecting her Perp. You can't see that someone could be Sexually Assaulted and not be filled with Hatred and Contempt with the Perp? What she describes are Moves of Seduction, she didn't want them, so she complained, but that does not mean she was psychologically destroyed as a result.
Why wouldn't it? That's where the complaint she claims to have filed would be.Not in itself. If it does unearth one, would it change Yours?
Not worth the time, you will never be convinced by any evidence that comes out, unless it's put out by a Bro.
Her initial allegation was not assault it was just Joe touching her neck. Then the story changed.There is nothing inconsistent with her Allegations and still respecting her Perp. You can't see that someone could be Sexually Assaulted and not be filled with Hatred and Contempt with the Perp? What she describes are Moves of Seduction, she didn't want them, so she complained, but that does not mean she was psychologically destroyed as a result.
Yes, you win the internet...for nowSo you have nothing, not even an attempt. Duly noted.
