The GTX 780, 770, 760 ti Thread *First review leaked $700+?*

Page 44 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

96Firebird

Diamond Member
Nov 8, 2010
5,749
345
126
Yes nvidia can charge what they want. I also reserve the right to switch video card companies which is what I did. $260 and my 7950 overclocked is in the same ballpark as any card made.

Great! Sounds like you are very happy with your card, and I'm sure it works well for you. Look on the bright side, you won't be spending money on video cards any time soon!
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
Your still wrong though because GK110 is the big die GPU version of GK104. The follow up GPU to the 580 GTX.

Gk110 is the big die of the Kepler architecture or generation. The follow up of the GTX 580 was the GTX 680! The follow up of the bigger die GF-110 was the GK-110 and the market conditions are different!
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
Yes nvidia can charge what they want. I also reserve the right to switch video card companies which is what I did. $260 and my 7950 overclocked is in the same ballpark as any card made.

Indeed! Having choice is wonderful for one's subjective needs, tastes, tolerances, thresholds and wallet considerations.
 

wand3r3r

Diamond Member
May 16, 2008
3,180
0
0
Amazon link is down... Took a couple screenshots.

U3Rpqem.png


IASExQ6.png
 

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
Gk110 is the big die of the Kepler architecture or generation. The follow up of the GTX 580 was the GTX 680! The follow up of the bigger die GF-110 was the GK-110 and the market conditions are different!

I think everyone knows that the GK110 is the follow up to the 580 GTX.

You can defend Nvidia all you like but history shows a clear pattern.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
One can make the point that the successor to the GF-110 is the GK-110 but the successor for the GTX 580 was the GTX 680, sorry!

Market conditions are different!
 

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
One can make the point that the successor to the GF-110 is the GK-110 but the successor for the GTX 580 was the GTX 680, sorry!

Market conditions are different!

No what is different is that Nvidia failed this time around.

28nm and 7.1bln transistors means that it couldnt get the yields high enough and the chips cheap enough.

The die size is smaller than the Nvidia 280 GTX GPU. The 480 and 580 GTX all had 500mm2+ GPU's
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,147
1,330
126
I will be waiting to see if your a hypocrite when the 9970 is released and they jack up the price.

Sontins long shown his hypocrisy so that's a forgone conclusion.

The hypocrisy around here is long-standing. AMD released the 7970 for $550, about where flagship GPUs had been in the past from AMD/ATI and from nvidia and the tears were endless. Had a few posters here soiling their diapers and crapping themselves in every thread they could.

Titan comes out and nvidia literally doubles the price for the flagship GPU and the same posters defend it. GTX780 will come out later this week for close to $700 and they'll defend that as well. Then the wannabe financial gurus will roll out with their ramblings and it will be the same thing ad nauseam. The usual trolls will try to bait one another with the same tired crap. etc.

And no one will discuss the actual cards or their experiences with it :awe: It's always been

flip-flop.jpg


here depending on which vendor is being discussed. Just look at this thread. At least it's now being confined to one thread rather than multiples created for every new image leaked onto the internet. :awe:
 

Rvenger

Elite Member <br> Super Moderator <br> Video Cards
Apr 6, 2004
6,283
5
81
We must live in different dimensions.

In this dimension Nvidia killed it this generation.



Yes, but I think they are getting too cocky on the GTX 7XX series now. ...And we will wait and see if that rings true ;)
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
Looks like the GTX 780 will be 599.99 US, 770 449.99 US, 760ti 299.99 US

http://www.cnbeta.com/articles/238009.htm

A GTX780 graphics card box at the bottom of the parameter specifications sheet

NVIDIA GTX 780 official specifications

GTX780 belongs to the GTX700 series flagship product of the new generation, equipped with of the GTX TITAN Titan before the release of the same GK110 core, core-specific code is "GK110-300-A2, including 2304 kernel stream processors, but unfortunately only 3G GDRR5 of memory, and before the release of the GTX TITAN worse half, in addition to the original thought it would be a G version, I did not realize only 3 GB, a bit mean! 384Bit bit wide and just listed HD7990 default 863MHz, can be dynamically increased to 900 MHz, memory running in the 1502 MHz. See from the specifications on GTX780 approximately the GTX TITAN8 furnace, according to the information at our disposal, GTX780 measured performance just between the GTX680 and GTXTITAN, and be regarded as a transitional product, the GTX TITAN and GTX780 there are still a lot of space and therefore can not exclude subsequent to launch new GTXTIITAN LE version!

Finally, GTX780 8 +6 pin power supply, and up to 250W TDP According to official GTX780 will not exceed 230 watts! Flagship card is a very energy-efficient! The tail I / O expansion interfaces including dual-link DVI, HDMI.

The parameters of the the upcoming GTX780/GTX770/GTX760TI card is contrast:

GTX TITAN GTX 780 GTX 770 GTX 760ti

GPU core GK110 GK110 GK104-425 GK104-225

The CUDA Cores stream processor 2,688,249,615,361,344

TMU (texture mapping unit) 224 192 128 112

ROPs 48 40 32 32

Memory: 6GB GDDR5 3GB GDDR5 2GB GDDR5 2GB GDDR5

Bit wide interface: 384 384 256 256

Suggested retail price $ 999 $ 599 $ 449 $ 299
 

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
If that true 780 is a bit too high imo, but the 760 Ti is going to really put a lien on AMD's 7950 and even 7970.

~$225 7950's would be great to see!
 

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
We must live in different dimensions.

In this dimension Nvidia killed it this generation.

Im talking about GK110. They failed to launch it when it was due and for the price it was intended.

But yeh keep twisting and partial quoting to make a sensational post.
 

chimaxi83

Diamond Member
May 18, 2003
5,457
63
101
We must live in different dimensions.

In this dimension Nvidia killed it this generation.

That's weird. When 680 came out at the beginning of this generation, you were one of the many complaining about "mid range". Now, at the END of the generation Nvidia brings out Titan, which at $1000 beats AMDs $400 card. Quite the killing indeed.
 

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com
$599 GTX780 is mildly disappointing, although not out of line with Nvidia's gtx480 and gtx580 premium pricing. I think the gtx770 @ $449 is more disappointing though. Should have been a $399 product. A 760ti @ $299, if it's gtx670 speeds, is the only priced-to-sell-fast card out of the 3.
 
Last edited:

BallaTheFeared

Diamond Member
Nov 15, 2010
8,115
0
71
That's weird. When 680 came out at the beginning of this generation, you were one of the whiners about "mid range". Now, at the END of the generation Nvidia brings out Titan, which at $1000 beats AMDs $400 card. Quite the killing indeed.

Nothing weird, just different perspectives.

Indeed I was one of the whiners about GK104 being mid-range. Were you one of the whiners about 7970's guilt by association?
 

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com
No what is different is that Nvidia failed this time around.

If by failed you mean stomped market share out of AMD, increased margins, and competed with a roughly equaling performing part with much less mm^2 then yes sir you are correct. Nvidia failed hard and are nearly bankrupt now.
 

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
If by failed you mean stomped market share out of AMD, increased margins, and competed with a roughly equaling performing part with much less mm^2 then yes sir you are correct. Nvidia failed hard and are nearly bankrupt now.

Yet another.... who wants to partial quote and make a headline out of thin air.

The 7970 stomps all over the 680 at GP GPU and also in 9/10 games in FPS terms. Not to mention value for money, free AAA games and overclocking.
 

96Firebird

Diamond Member
Nov 8, 2010
5,749
345
126
Im talking about GK110. They failed to launch it when it was due and for the price it was intended.

They succeeded in launching over 18,000 GK110s for the Titan supercomputer.

Follow the money, when there is a guaranteed 18k order!
 

blackened23

Diamond Member
Jul 26, 2011
8,548
2
0
That's weird. When 680 came out at the beginning of this generation, you were one of the many complaining about "mid range". Now, at the END of the generation Nvidia brings out Titan, which at $1000 beats AMDs $400 card. Quite the killing indeed.

Maybe you can explain this one to me, Chimax. :) I'm still completely confused as to how an unreleased chip could ever be considered high end. If we did that on a broad basis - nothing would be considered high end, heck everything is "mid-range". Now, are we going to move goal posts and state that Tahiti was always mid range. VI was in the works and there's the true high end - of course that would be a ridiculous argument. Of course GK110 is out NOW, but at GK104s launch it was in no way "mid range", because nothing better was in existence.

That argument always has, and always will be silly. GK110 wasn't released or near-ready at the time of GK104s launch, so seeing the GK104 proclaimed as mid range when nothing better was ready or released, is quite funny. Going back in time to March 2012 there is no argument for GK104 being "mid range" unless one is being intentionally obtuse. But I do understand the "mid range" phrase is a favored phrase by some more dense posters, stated as a means of starting an inflammatory argument. (I know the other side is guilty of doing similar things, before anyone points this out).

Or if we can move the goalposts for either side based on unreleased products, shall we do that? Is that a "thing" now?
 
Last edited:

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com
Yet another.... who wants to partial quote and make a headline out of thin air.

The 7970 stomps all over the 680 at GP GPU and also in 9/10 games in FPS terms. Not to mention value for money, free AAA games and overclocking.

How many GPGPU games do you play? How's that working out for AMD sales in the professional space? How much has the hd7970 sold compared to gtx680 in the consumer space? How are those margins for Tahiti vs. GK104? How much smaller can you actually demonstrate that your IQ to be?

How can you, in any sense of any definition of sanity, say Nvidia failed when they have entirely stomped AMD in sales at the 28nm generation and have done so without needing to include 17 different games with their cards?
 

Fx1

Golden Member
Aug 22, 2012
1,215
5
81
How many GPGPU games do you play? How's that working out for AMD sales in the professional space? How much has the hd7970 sold compared to gtx680 in the consumer space? How are those margins for Tahiti vs. GK104? How much smaller can you actually demonstrate that your IQ to be?

How can you, in any sense of any definition of sanity, say Nvidia failed when they have entirely stomped AMD in sales at the 28nm generation and have done so without needing to include 17 different games with their cards?

I said Nvidia failed to bring the GK110 to market like the GF110 did for the 580 GTX.

Cant you read? Your IQ must be lower than mine since you cant read the simple post i made. I never said Nvidia failed in general. I said they failed to bring GK110 to the 680 GTX. Clearly they couldnt get the price right since it launched 1 year late and at $1000. The 480 and 580 GTX launched at normal prices and on time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.