• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

The Defective Conservative Brain; It's Evolution Stupid.

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
"Actual science", LOL, that's a good one. Anything that comes from Motherjones can be safely discarded as trash at the same level of credibility as WND and The National Enquirer, both of which are actually a tad more credible, but not much.

This is the link to the study; http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS

It was published by Cambridge University Press; are they on the same level of credibility as WND and The NAtional Enquirer as well??
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
you have no facts supporting your twisted conclusion.

Tons,.. but, just like a conservative, you have dismissed them. Since they 'threaten' your existence and credibility.

Read the study, look at your life; get back to us if you do indeed feel it is OK to lose your mind over a gay black teenager eating skittles while listening to loud music.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
No where in any of those studies have they proved much less said the differences were a defect. So based on the real facts you're trying to pass off lies as facts. So much for your critical thinking abilities or moral high ground.
 

michal1980

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2003
8,019
43
91
Tons,.. but, just like a conservative, you have dismissed them. Since they 'threaten' your existence and credibility.

Read the study, look at your life; get back to us if you do indeed feel it is OK to lose your mind over a gay black teenager eating skittles while listening to loud music.

I read the link you had in your first post.

It lacks the word 'defect'.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
It has no use in today's world. It is useless. Therefore, when it goes off, it is defective. Since you are NOT in danger of being killed.

And, you can't control it either.

Look at how many of you have lost your shit over this. You are all doing the exact thing you genes tell you to do. And, there is no danger of losing your life over this thread.

You need to calm down.

Progressives seem to suffer from really badly inflated senses of self worth, but believe me when I tell you, no one "lost their shit" because of your silly article.

This is the link to the study; http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS

It was published by Cambridge University Press; are they on the same level of credibility as WND and The NAtional Enquirer as well??

Please link to the actual study, not Motherjones, or another group of loony leftist interpretation of a study.
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
I read the link you had in your first post.

It lacks the word 'defect'.

I have connected the two.

1) science has proven the reactive nature of conservatives is from a very very long time ago in human evolution. It was wonderful when tigers and lions and bears were after us,.. but, no need for it today. Since we are all fat and squishy in our homes.

2) Since this reactive mechanism is clearly in full effect (screaming about the war on Christians, ACA, immigrants - all hot button issues/alarms for conservatives), this mechanism is defective. It continues blaring and screaming over and over - with no end in sight (for now).
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
Progressives seem to suffer from really badly inflated senses of self worth, but believe me when I tell you, no one "lost their shit" because of your silly article.
Go back and rifle through the initial cries and lies.

Boomerang has even gone radio silent over being called out to linking a URL to another "article" and claiming it was liberals with these defects,... when it was clearly stated it was conservatives. He then made it look like he was stating it was conservatives, not liberals. Me originally quoting him proves it.

Please link to the actual study, not Motherjones, or another group of loony leftist interpretation of a study.
Read the article, which has commentary and relevant discussions, and click on the link - welcome to the internet. Enjoy.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
believe me when I tell you, no one "lost their shit" because of your silly article.

The only people who have lost anything due to this thread are those trying to twist the facts of the study and trying to pass off their lies as facts. So sad they have no critical thinking abilities and must resort to lies to sell their BS.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
Go back and rifle through the initial cries and lies.

Boomerang has even gone radio silent over being called out to linking a URL to another "article" and claiming it was liberals with these defects,... when it was clearly stated it was conservatives. He then made it look like he was stating it was conservatives, not liberals. Me originally quoting him proves it.

People responding to you, or ignoring you on the internet is not "losing their shit". Like I said, your inflated sense of self worth has skewed what little thinking skills you had.


Read the article, which has commentary and relevant discussions, and click on the link - welcome to the internet. Enjoy.

Sorry, but I have seen more than enough blatant, outright lies, misleading articles, stories and commentaries from Motherjones to not waste my time. Please link to an actual study that supports your, and their silly claim, not a Motherjones article, and Motherjones community commentary about one.
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
Sorry, but I have seen more than enough blatant, outright lies, misleading articles, stories and commentaries from Motherjones to not waste my time. Please link to an actual study that supports your, and their silly claim, not a Motherjones article, and Motherjones community commentary about one.

Then don't click the link I posted in the OP. Since you refuse to listen to anything; stay uninformed and blind - it is your problem.

Good luck discrediting Cambridge.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
This thread puts on embarrassing display the mind of a "liberal" when it goes over the edge.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
No where in the Cambridge study did it state that the differences were due to any defects, therefore defect not found. Tis a shame certain people in here must lie about what was said in the study.
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
This thread puts on embarrassing display the mind of a "liberal" when it goes over the edge.

So is quoting someone you are ignoring, and then announcing; Hey! I am ignoring you! You there, the person I am ignoring,.. look,... I am ignoring you!! Take a look see!
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
No where in the Cambridge study did it state that the differences were due to any defects, therefore defect not found. Tis a shame certain people in here must lie about what was said in the study.

So, a blaring alarm, that won't stop blaring, when there is no danger around - is working perfectly OK?

Hey, aren't conservatives against false flags??
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
I don't know about conservatives but I was raised to tell the truth, obviously something you missed in your youth. Moonbeam and your spin on the study is so far from the truth it isn't funny. Based on the lies you two have told about the study I can't trust anything you post in here to be truthful. Specially you and all these boogiestrawmen you post about in here.
 
Last edited:

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
This thread puts on embarrassing display the mind of a "liberal" when it goes over the edge.
Methinks the edge is decades behind him. All that's left of him is shrill, foamy hate for anyone who dares think differently.

Actually I could just as well have left off "differently". lol
 
Nov 30, 2006
15,456
389
121
This thread puts on embarrassing display the mind of a "liberal" when it goes over the edge.
I'm actually embarrassed for him as well...he's plainly not very bright, but seems to think he's quite intelligent. I imagine many of our liberal friends here feel the same way to some degree as noted by their relative lack of participation in this thread.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
This thread would be largely indistinguishable from German propaganda circa 1938 if you just replaced "conservative" with "Jew".
 

Newell Steamer

Diamond Member
Jan 27, 2014
6,894
8
0
I don't know about conservatives but I was raised to tell the truth, obviously something you missed in your youth. Moonbeam and your spin on the study is so far from the truth it isn't funny. Based on the lies you two have told about the study I can't trust anything you post in here to be truthful. Specially you and all these boogiestrawmen you post about in here.

And, of course, you have no issues with boomerang's lie, right?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
I have no idea what this boob keeps saying unless someone else quotes him, but it's quite clear that he - like several other prominent posters in this forum - would be more than happy to purge "conservatives" in door-to-door sweeps. Being the enlightened "liberals" they are, I'm sure they'd be generous and offer "re-education" to those that wanted to avoid the final solution.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
984
126
I have no idea what this boob keeps saying unless someone else quotes him, but it's quite clear that he - like several other prominent posters in this forum - would be more than happy to purge "conservatives" in door-to-door sweeps. Being the enlightened "liberals" they are, I'm sure they'd be generous and offer "re-education" to those that wanted to avoid the final solution.

o_O That's a bit of a stretch don't you think?

jump-to-conclusions-mat.jpg