OK, I'll bite. The Swiss shouldn't ban minarets because Israel is occupying Palestine. Now can we move on?
Not exactly.
If conquering is ok by the west, why is architecture of the east bad?
OK, I'll bite. The Swiss shouldn't ban minarets because Israel is occupying Palestine. Now can we move on?
Leave the god damn Jews alone. Israel exists, build yourself a bridge and get over it.
Then expect turmoil for the rest of your lifetime. Continue to marginalize people and they will strike back. You are part of the problem.
I love how it's completely ok to conquer an entire country... but architecture is bad!
Yea, leave those poor Jews at peace so they can continue to kill more children.
Yea, leave those poor Jews at peace so they can continue to kill more children.
I gotcha.. it is cool to invade and conquer, if the west is doing it...
Continue to attack a people and don't be surprised when they respond.
This is a great thread to get a list of the racists and freepers that post here.
Then expect turmoil for the rest of your lifetime. Continue to marginalize people and they will strike back. You are part of the problem.
I love how it's completely ok to conquer an entire country... but architecture is bad!
He didn't suggest anything of the sort.Are you assuming all the ME violence will be no more if the Jews packed up their bags and left Israel?
What keeps you from considering a two-state solution on the basis of international law?So I guess you have three solutions:
1) Kill/expel the jews from Israel
2) Keep status quo and live with terrorism
3) Kill/convert all muslims
Obviously #1 and #3 are unacceptable, so i guess we'll live in fear until we die while people like you hope for #1.
Are you assuming all the ME violence will be no more if the Jews packed up their bags and left Israel? You are a joke. They will find the next scapegoat to target to maintain their power.
So I guess you have three solutions:
1) Kill/expel the jews from Israel
2) Keep status quo and live with terrorism
3) Kill/convert all muslims
Obviously #1 and #3 are unacceptable, so i guess we'll live in fear until we die while people like you hope for #1.
Yea, leave those poor Jews at peace so they can continue to kill more children.
He didn't suggest anything of the sort.
What keeps you from considering a two-state solution on the basis of international law?
Bullshit, on both counts.Israel offered, and the Arabs rejected. The arabs living in Israel have no interest in a two state solution.
They kill a hell of a lot more Arabs than the other way around, children and otherwise.They are doing a pretty shitty job of it if they are actually trying to do this....
Israel offered, and the Arabs rejected. The arabs living in Israel have no interest in a two state solution.
Are you assuming all the ME violence will be no more if the Jews packed up their bags and left Israel? You are a joke. They will find the next scapegoat to target to maintain their power.
So I guess you have three solutions:
1) Kill/expel the jews from Israel
2) Keep status quo and live with terrorism
3) Kill/convert all muslims
Obviously #1 and #3 are unacceptable, so i guess we'll live in fear until we die while people like you hope for #1.
Oh really? What happened to the Arab-Peace Initiative by the Arab League?
It's been years and it's still collecting dust at Israeli desks.
In a nutshell, the Arab peace initiative offers full peace, recognition and diplomatic relations to Israel if Israel would agree to:
1- Leave occupied land since 1967 in Palestine, Syria and Lebanon
2- Allow right of return for Palestinian refugees back to their land in the Palestinian state.
3- End all expansion and bloodshed
Israel demonstrated it's full desire to conquer more land and to exterminate / expel more Arabs by refusing the Arab Peace initiative. hell, they didn't even bother with counter-offering.
So don't think anyone is fooled by Israel's intentions. Israel only wants more land for it and for it's extremist settlers no matter what the cost.
none of this arguing about jews/israelis vs palestinians changes anything in that religion that causes domestic abuse and honor killings and intolerance and taliban and wahabism et al
There is nothing suicidal about Israel conforming to international law, but they won't accept international law.Yea, asking Israel to commit suicide by opening themselves up to most vulnerability - they'll accept that deal.
Israel's land is within it's 1948-1967 borders, some of it not actually theirs until 1993 when they tricked Palestinians into giving it up at Oslo. Furthermore Israel isn't rightly using the West Bank or the Golan heights as security buffers, unless one is so demented as to consider stuffing them full of settlers to serve as human shields a security buffer. Also, on the subject of trickery, that is what Israel's partial 10 month settlement pause is about, as explained by an Israeli TV host who even went so far as to use the slur "goyim" to refer to us Americans.Trick the jews into giving up their security buffer
They kill a hell of a lot more Arabs than the other way around, children and otherwise.
Israel does target civilians, as reported by every human rights group that looked into the recent Gaza massacre, and plenty of others. Granted, it seems you would prefer they murder off many more civilians than they have, but that doesn't change the fact that they do target civilians.
All I see is in this post is hand-wringing and excuses. India had no Marshall plan, nor did China and their early leaders were as anti-Western as the Arabs and Muslims and yet, a couple of decades ago, they figured out that it's either swim with the international tide or sink. The latter are still debating whether a cat has to be black or white to catch mice.
If Muslims and Arabs stopped worrying about a little sliver of land called Israel, stopped worrying about how high a minaret or how low a burqa should be or write treatises about whether it's OK to shake hands with an infidel, perhaps they'll find the time to contemplate the size of the hole they've dug themselves into and take the first steps to climb out of it.
