Starting to like Bloomberg

[SteveGrabowski]

agreed, just pointing it out to some of the bro’s

What makes you think Bloomberg would pick anything but justices with a right wing economic worldview? This guy seems to be in the Wall Street did nothing wrong, it was caused by loans to scary negroes camp for the 2008 economic crash. That is a complete deal breaker. Sell out the entire party just to get some token concessions on gun control? No thanks.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

What makes you think Bloomberg would pick anything but justices with a right wing economic worldview? This guy seems to be in the Wall Street did nothing wrong, it was caused by loans to scary negroes camp for the 2008 economic crash. That is a complete deal breaker. Sell out the entire party just to get some token concessions on gun control? No thanks.

Hey regarding the scary negros comment his popularity has risen amongst black.
I’m going to throw the same question back, what makes you think he would appoint turds?
NY ran pretty good when he was in charge.

 

[SteveGrabowski]

Hey regarding the scary negros comment his popularity has risen amongst black.
I’m going to throw the same question back, what makes you think he would appoint turds?
NY ran pretty good when he was in charge.

Because he shares a lunatic right wing view of why our economy nearly collapsed. Because someone who buys the presidency won't appoint someone doesn't agree with the ridiculous Citizens United ruling. Now you answer why he'd be good.

 

[JSt0rm]

bloomberg is the bernie spoiler.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Because he shares a lunatic right wing view of why our economy nearly collapsed. Because someone who buys the presidency won't appoint someone doesn't agree with Citizens United. Now you answer why he'd be good.

In this case, as I said earlier. Winning is far more important than my agreeing with everything the candidate does.
I don’t have time but we could look up what sort of State Judges he brought to NYC or how the States Attorney General acted. Those would be good guides.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

bloomberg is the bernie spoiler.

Everyone is a Bernie Spoiler

 

[SteveGrabowski]

In this case, as I said earlier. Winning is far more important than my agreeing with everything the candidate does.
I don’t have time but we could look up what sort of State Judges he brought to NYC or how the States Attorney General acted. Those would be good guides.

Of course I knew this would be your answer. Not Trump! I'm not Trump worked so well in the 2016 election. If you don't have time to answer a question then log off and stop demanding others answer yours'.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Of course I knew this would be your answer. Not Trump! I'm not Trump worked so well in the 2016 election. If you don't have time to answer a question then log off and stop demanding others answer yours'.

Dude I stated it amongst the first post

 

[SteveGrabowski]

Dude I stated it amongst the first post

I thought you were too busy.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

I thought you were too busy.

I have no idea what you mean here.
Edit: I assume you mean judges, I’ll look late tonight. Just not now.

Don’t blame me that you didn’t read. I do the same thing all the time. Own it.

Here is post #1for review

Starting to like Bloomberg

Not my first choice but winning is more important than my perfect candidate. As I said in another thread Bloomberg appears to be the only guy running to win. Sorry for the twatter link, short video and worth a minute to watch.

forums.anandtech.com

 

[NWRMidnight]

We don't need a Trump 2.0. He's just smarter and more cunning than Trump...

 

[SteveGrabowski]

I have no idea what you mean here.
Edit: I assume you mean judges, I’ll look late tonight. Just not now.

Don’t blame me that you didn’t read. I do the same thing all the time. Own it.

Here is post #1for review

Starting to like Bloomberg

Not my first choice but winning is more important than my perfect candidate. As I said in another thread Bloomberg appears to be the only guy running to win. Sorry for the twatter link, short video and worth a minute to watch.

forums.anandtech.com

I read your post. Or should I say watched the dumb video.

 

[Moonbeam]

Choice A Trump picks the next 2-3 Supreme Court Justices
Choice B Bloomberg picks the next 2-3 Supreme Court Justices

Choice 3 we get a progressive progressive government and expand the court to 15.

 

[sportage]

I think we should ask Donald Trump.
Mr Trump, who do you fear more, Mike Bloomberg or Joe Biden?
And.... you think you could get Rudy Giuliani over to Ukraine within 24 hours to start the Bloomberg investigation? 12 hours?

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Choice 3 we get a progressive progressive government and expand the court to 15.

No choice 3 there never are 3 viable choices

 

[Ajay]

Choice 3 we get a progressive progressive government and expand the court to 15.

Freaking founding fathers didn't put a number in the constitution, so we get to do this every year.

 

[Moonbeam]

No choice 3 there never are 3 viable choices

Then we can eliminate your two.

 

[SteveGrabowski]

Freaking founding fathers didn't put a number in the constitution, so we get to do this every year.

They effectively did due to how congress elects the president should the electoral college fail to cast a majority vote for one candidate. Three strong candidates stop anyone from getting to an electoral vote majority and whichever party controls congress wins. What a joke, fuck this nation's election laws.

 

[fskimospy]

They effectively did due to how congress elects the president should the electoral college fail to cast a majority vote for one candidate. Three strong candidates stop anyone from getting to an electoral vote majority and whichever party controls congress wins. What a joke, fuck this nation's election laws.

Are you still arguing Bloomberg is running third party? There is still no evidence for that. In fact, all evidence says the opposite.

The choice is simple, Trump vs. Literally Anyone Else = Literally Anyone Else. Those who think they can wait until 2024 are not factoring in there may not be a free and fair 2024. (Hell, there’s already a good argument there won’t be a free and fair 2020)

While I don’t like Bloomberg’s financial policies in the end it doesn’t matter. If the choice were between Trump and a current practicing non-Trumpkin Republican I would vote for the Republican too.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Then we can eliminate your two.

How do you propose we “eliminate” the current President.
Again *if* the choice is Donal Trump nominating 2-3 justices or Mike Bloomberg nominating 2-3 justices which is your choice.

 

[Fanatical Meat]

Are you still arguing Bloomberg is running third party? There is still no evidence for that. In fact, all evidence says the opposite.

The choice is simple, Trump vs. Literally Anyone Else = Literally Anyone Else. Those who think they can wait until 2024 are not factoring in there may not be a free and fair 2024. (Hell, there’s already a good argument there won’t be a free and fair 2020)

While I don’t like Bloomberg’s financial policies in the end it doesn’t matter. If the choice were between Trump and a current practicing non-Trumpkin Republican I would vote for the Republican too.

I don’t understand why some people don’t get this.
Classic binary choice, either or. Very simple to choose.
Yes you can want more, yes it is fine to say Bloomberg isn’t your first choice or as you said you don’t like specific economic things regarding Bloomberg. I don’t why this is a difficult decision.

I’ll probably vote Bernie in my primary but regardless I am willing to vote for anyone but President Trump.
I stand by my earlier posts, as of now Bloomberg gets it and he is the only one playing to win. Clear consistent message.
Bernie has great plans but they all lack in how he plans on getting them done.
Warrens has great plans but she is boring like Hillary
Biden seemed to be the right guy but he doesn’t have the fire in his belly. Shit I’ve yet to see Biden do an interview on a news show
Buttigieg could be the right guy I simply never see any ads from him
All the others are just running to be the Secretary of whatever at this point.

 

[Bitek]

He'll be a Democrat.
He'll be picking Democratic friendly judges.

This is not a difficult question to consider.

Do you want 2-3 Kagans and Sotomayors for the next 40 years

OR

Do you want 2-3 Kavenaughs and Alitos?

Trump doesn't give a shit, maybe he'll even nominate Steven Miller.

That, amongst other things, is what's at stake this year. The rest of the SC, other than Thomas, is pretty young and won't be turning over for decades.

"Herpaderp they're all the same trollololol" is bullshit.

Boycotts and protest votes just cost you the election. Ask the Ralph Nader voters in FL how that shit turned out.

Oops, we missed the 9/11 hijackers, invaded Iraq, started secret torture prisons, killed hundreds of thousands of people, burnt trillions of dollars into smoke and then crashed the global economy and millions of people went underwater on their houses.
And Bush picked two SC justices including the chief, and did nothing for climate change other than more oil drilling.

Really showed the DNC huh?

 

[GodisanAtheist]

Let's throw some gasoline on this dumpster fire:

If Bloomberg is the Dem nominee I'd rather vote for a dumb as rocks right wing politician over the shrewd right wing politician. Better vote for the lesser of two evils, right?

I think the general sentiment in this country is the same: The system is broken and we need to burn this sucker down and get it back on track for the blue collar masses of this country. The right tried with Trump and we got more deep fried bullshit; its time to try again with the polar opposite of Trump (moral center-wise) with Bernie.

 

[Bitek]

Let's throw some gasoline on this dumpster fire:

If Bloomberg is the Dem nominee I'd rather vote for a dumb as rocks right wing politician over the shrewd right wing politician. Better vote for the lesser of two evils, right?

I think the general sentiment in this country is the same: The system is broken and we need to burn this sucker down and get it back on track for the blue collar masses of this country. The right tried with Trump and we got more deep fried bullshit; its time to try again with the polar opposite of Trump (moral center-wise) with Bernie.

Year 2000 says hi

 

[SteveGrabowski]

Vote for me because I'm not Trump was a loser in 2016 but now all of a sudden it's going to be a winning message with a candidate like Bloomberg who the base doesn't like?