Most of those haters are from Eastern Europe/Russia area according to posting times. What do you expect from that area? In those countries they are not able to develop CPU but they are very good in naming hundreds of reasons why something is not possible. Even when Apple proved that 6xALU core is possible. It's funny and sad at the same time.
Still waiting for your actual evidence of how 4xALU's being a bottleneck in SPEC, the only sad thing here is your lack of integrity by making big statements and then completely failing to back any of it up.
Still waiting to hear how you propose to feed these 6 ALU's with a 6 uop /4-5 x86 instructions issue limit and you have to do loads and stores within that.
Also no one said it was impossible, whats being question is the actual gain by doing so in a vacuum.
if AMD went 6x ALU's it wouldn't be the "killer feature"the killer features would be all the stuff that allowed you utilisation all those ALU's enough that the cost of them and the read/write ports to the PRF would be worth it. Execution of Data is easy, Movement of data is extremely hard. The fundamental difference between things like CPU's/GPU's/FPGA's/DSP etc is not execution its data movement.
overall you just need to get a clue..... Dunning Kruger and all that.