I'm talking circuitry layout low level changes. What I'm saying is that they said architectural enhancements. This is not rearranging the number of CU, rops, etc.As i said, that could mean a lot of things, for example they did not say anything about reducing ROP number, and they did. I dont need a deep analysis, but that 59% could easily be the result of freq increase and the use of DDR4-3200.
Maybe cutting rops by half and reducing CU number along with the die shrink helped to archive those high freqs. But thats my guess, and nothing they said leads me to belive the Renoir CU performs better per clock than Picasso CUs. And thats was my point when we were discussing Renoir IGP a few months ago.
Wharever they did allows for very high freqs, thats is what makes up for the CU loss.
You of course can believe whatever you want, but expect to continue being surprised when reality is different from your reasoning.