Special Counsel Mueller has submitted his report to Attorney General Barr

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
i think it's just fucktards gloating. They've all come out of the woodwork.
I agree. And while it's interesting that the goalposts for high crimes have been moved to something more like high treason, the constitutional reality is that Trump commits a high crime every time a foreign dignitary stays at one of his hotels or golfs at one his resorts. And God knows what other ways he's using the Office of the Presidency for personal gain. The Emoluments Clause still exists.
 

dbr1

Member
Jan 23, 2011
53
18
81
I don't like that some posters call posters they don't agree with a 'Russian agent.' But at the same time, I really don't care if some ill-mannered partisan hack gets what he gives. If you can't take it, then don't dish it out. Or at the very least, don't whine like a bitch about it.

Not whining like a bitch about it, fuckwad. Just pointing out how ridiculous and crazy it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IJTSSG

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Not whining like a bitch about it, fuckwad. Just pointing out how ridiculous and crazy it is.
That you came in out of nowhere and started hurling insults at everyone while complaining that everyone was hurling at you? I totally agree that that is ridiculous and crazy.
 

dbr1

Member
Jan 23, 2011
53
18
81
That you came in out of nowhere and started hurling insults at everyone while complaining that everyone was hurling at you? I totally that that is ridiculous and crazy.

Check the sequence. I posted respectfully until someone called me an asshole. I complained to the moderator and was told calling each other obscene names on this forum is AOK.

Every time I use a profane name is in direct response to one directed at me.

You have materially misrepresented what I told you, which was, "Frankly, I find it hard to believe you haven't seen enough posting to know that personal insults are common." And then I linked you to the rules and even copy-pasted the pertinent rule. In any and every event, though, there is but one legitimate venue for "discussing" a mod action, and that is Moderator Discussions.

Perknose
Forum Director
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Rifter and IJTSSG

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
I do not believe I am a fucktard, but you in fact may be a coc.ksucker.

See how much fun is it to play on this edgy forum where Leftists get to call you any obscene name they want?
And you're proof that Righties can do that here too.

Sorry, but your schtick is boring. Every RWNJ on the planet already plays the little game where they jump into a forum calling people names and then acts the poor victim when someone calls them a name back.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
I dunno... the whole thing seems odd. Way too much lying and changing of stories by too many people to really think it was all on the up and up.
Would very much like to see the full report but I'm not holding my breath it'll ever come out other than as a secret leak of some sort.
 

dbr1

Member
Jan 23, 2011
53
18
81
And you're proof that Righties can do that here too.

Sorry, but your schtick is boring. Every RWNJ on the planet already plays the little game where they jump into a forum calling people names and then acts the poor victim when someone calls them a name back.

Another Leftist challenged by the truth that is easily verifiable. I have made no profane insults except in direct response to one made against me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IJTSSG

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Check the sequence. I posted respectfully until someone called me an asshole. I complained to the moderator and was told calling each other obscene names on this forum is AOK.

Every time I use a profane name is in direct response to one directed at me.
Cool. So how did you expect to hold the moral high ground then if 2 wrongs make a right to you?

BTW, I'd like to point out that the poster who liked your post does literally nothing here but spew hatefilled profanity at everyone who dares to disagree with him.
 

dbr1

Member
Jan 23, 2011
53
18
81
Cool. So how did you expect to hold the moral high ground then if 2 wrongs make a right to you?

BTW, I'd like to point out that the poster who liked your post does literally nothing here but spew hatefilled profanity at everyone who dares to disagree with him.

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. I'm not going to get verbally abused here for the transgression of having a divergent opinion without fighting back. I don't like it but it seems to be the way you guys roll here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IJTSSG

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Check the sequence. I posted respectfully until someone called me an asshole. I complained to the moderator and was told calling each other obscene names on this forum is AOK.

Every time I use a profane name is in direct response to one directed at me.

This was your second post after a 5 year hiatus-. Very respectful-

View attachment 4538

Image only posts are not allowed in P&N
 

IJTSSG

Golden Member
Aug 12, 2014
1,126
281
136
Cool. So how did you expect to hold the moral high ground then if 2 wrongs make a right to you?

BTW, I'd like to point out that the poster who liked your post does literally nothing here but spew hatefilled profanity at everyone who dares to disagree with him.
and he has a ton of fun doing it too.

Getting your ass kicked again huh Vicky. Not at all surprising.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
38,767
31,812
136
The report says the lack of evidence (needs to be emphasized the report doesn't put him 100% in the clear) on collusion/conspiracy bears on the intent in regards to obstruction. Because of no underlying crimes, they're dropping it as i expected might happen. The whole things ends up being whitewashed because idiots will gloat over the immense hurdle to even bring a case.
Lack of evidence? He admitted to it twice in public which proves state of mind. He said he wanted to stop the Russian investigation
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Another Leftist challenged by the truth that is easily verifiable. I have made no profane insults except in direct response to one made against me.
No, I'm the classical liberal that you claimed didn't exist anymore in one of your earlier posts. And you're not telling the truth. You may have waited to use profanity, but there's more to insults and namecalling than just profanity. Like if I said, typical paranoid rightwing nutjob racist bigot. Yaknow, stuff like that is hardly well-mannered. But in typical fashion, everyone was supposed to ignore that kind of thing from you and just kiss your ass because you're a 'conservative,' and that makes you better than everyone else, right?

And look, we're still talking about you, and not about how your precious Lord and God-Emperor was exonerated of not having knowingly committed high treason.
 
Last edited:

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
and he has a ton of fun doing it too.

Getting your ass kicked again huh Vicky. Not at all surprising.
You've never kicked my ass, Rage-clown, just bored the hell out of me. But thank you for chiming in to admit that what I said about you was true.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
The report says the lack of evidence (needs to be emphasized the report doesn't put him 100% in the clear) on collusion/conspiracy bears on the intent in regards to obstruction. Because of no underlying crimes, they're dropping it as i expected might happen. The whole things ends up being whitewashed because idiots will gloat over the immense hurdle to even bring a case.

Our legal system is built on Blackstone's ratio-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackstone's_ratio

So the GOP defense of Trump has become "Can't prove it in Court! Neener-neener!"

I mean, it wouldn't be right to hold any President to a higher standard, would it?
 

dbr1

Member
Jan 23, 2011
53
18
81
No, I'm the classical liberal that you claimed didn't exist anymore in one of your earlier posts. And you're not telling the truth. You may have waited to use profanity, but there's more to insults and namecalling than just profanity. Like if I said, typical paranoid rightwing nutjob racist bigot. Yaknow, stuff like that is hardly well-mannered. But in typical fashion, everyone was supposed to ignore and kiss your ass because you're a 'conservative,' and that makes you better than everyone else, right?

And look, we're still talking about you, and not about how your precious Lord and God-Emperor was exonerated of not having knowingly committed high treason.

Whatever. You are hardly a classical liberal IMO. Please try to convince me moving forward. If you and your other Leftist pals here want to have a polite reasonable discussion without profanity I am all for it.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,528
30,007
136
Whatever. You are hardly a classical liberal IMO. Please try to convince me moving forward. If you and your other Leftist pals here want to have a polite reasonable discussion without profanity I am all for it.

"leftist" haha

I'm sure in some part of your mind this is supposed to be some kind of uber insult. You'll have to get significantly more creative here. We've had conservatives who wanted to marry their toasters, can't put together a post without drenching their keyboard in spittle (still have one he keeps liking your posts), use RT as a news source without irony, etc, etc, etc.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Whatever. You are hardly a classical liberal IMO. Please try to convince me moving forward. If you and your other Leftist pals here want to have a polite reasonable discussion without profanity I am all for it.
Hey, I get it, the MAGA's have moved so far to the right with their Ethno-state authoritarianism that, of course, classical liberals look like radical leftists with their all people are created equal BS, right?
And we can't have that, can we? Cause then how else can you claim that someone is trying to silence your speech just for disagreeing with you?
 

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
15,646
8,186
136
Don't know if anyone asked or explained this but I was curious about it:

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

So help me out with this folks, not sure what this entails, so does anyone know what that means contextually speaking?
 

zerocool84

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
36,041
472
126
Don't know if anyone asked or explained this but I was curious about it:

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

So help me out with this folks, not sure what this entails, so does anyone know what that means contextually speaking?
There's most likely not enough evidence for any criminal activity.
Collusion is not a federal crime plus him being a president there would have to be a smoking gun.
 

dbr1

Member
Jan 23, 2011
53
18
81
"leftist" haha

I'm sure in some part of your mind this is supposed to be some kind of uber insult. You'll have to get significantly more creative here. We've had conservatives who wanted to marry their toasters, can't put together a post without drenching their keyboard in spittle (still have one he keeps liking your posts), use RT as a news source without irony, etc, etc, etc.

I use the word Leftist instead of Liberal because the modern political left is very far from liberal in any accurate sense of the word, specifically and most notably in intolerance of differing opinions.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Don't know if anyone asked or explained this but I was curious about it:

The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

So help me out with this folks, not sure what this entails, so does anyone know what that means contextually speaking?

It means they punted to Congress to make that determination as it applies to impeachment & removal from office.