Something to consider when pushing housing density.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
You know density makes housing cheaper, right?
I'm not seeing it. I guess it's anecdotal but every apartment complex that goes up in my city is more expensive than the previous. Multi-story complexes full of $2k+/mo apartments. More $500k+ single family homes being built. More forests shredded down.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,677
6,250
126
Do you need to worry about wolves? I got cayotes in the woods near my house.

Coyotes are not wolves and they are weaksauce compared to the Bears that showup in these parts. Coyotes are just yappy dogs.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
I'm not seeing it. I guess it's anecdotal but every apartment complex that goes up in my city is more expensive than the previous. Multi-story complexes full of $2k+/mo apartments. More $500k+ single family homes being built. More forests shredded down.
So to be clear you think supply and demand doesn’t apply for housing?
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
In fact, here's the 'affordable housing' the new high capacity construction is getting us around here.
1701649497646.png
1701649536593.png
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
So to be clear you think supply and demand doesn’t apply for housing?
I think that when the supply is constrained to a specific price range, the demand appears to reflect reality when in fact people are just dealing with it. There's a reason housing cost used to be a recommended 33% of net, then 33% of gross, and now 50% of net, etc.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
I think that when the supply is constrained to a specific price range, the demand appears to reflect reality when in fact people are just dealing with it. There's a reason housing cost used to be a recommended 33% of net, then 33% of gross, and now 50% of net, etc.
So why is the supply constrained?
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
So why is the supply constrained?
Because those funding the construction isn't targeting people who can afford $1k/mo housing, they're targeting people who can afford $2.5k/mo housing. Mind you, that doesn't mean they'll fill every unit, but there's no inexpensive apartments in the place.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
This is like saying you shouldn’t build new cars because only rich people buy new cars.
No, it's like saying you shouldn't only build $100k cars because you'll have an entire underclass of people who won't get to own a car anymore.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
No, it's like saying you shouldn't only build $100k cars because you'll have an entire underclass of people who won't get to own a car anymore.
if you don’t build new houses the rich people compete for the existing houses and guess what - they win.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
Because those funding the construction isn't targeting people who can afford $1k/mo housing, they're targeting people who can afford $2.5k/mo housing. Mind you, that doesn't mean they'll fill every unit, but there's no inexpensive apartments in the place.
No. Building new housing helps people at every level. It is basic economics. Supply and demand.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
if you don’t build new houses the rich people compete for the existing houses and guess what - they win.
But the existing houses aren't getting cheaper as they move out, they're getting more expensive too.

Home built in 2000 for 150k, sells in 2020 for 600k, person buys new home in 2020 for 600k, where exactly does that 150k (even plus inflation) buyer get a home in 2020?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
But the existing houses aren't getting cheaper as they move out, they're getting more expensive too.

Home built in 2000 for 150k, sells in 2020 for 600k, person buys new home in 2020 for 600k, where exactly does that 150k (even plus inflation) buyer get a home in 2020?
They are getting more expensive because building isn’t meeting demand!!

This is the whole point!
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
This is basic economics. Government regulation has prevented housing supply from meeting demand. Therefore housing gets more expensive.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
They are getting more expensive because building isn’t meeting demand!!

This is the whole point!
But nothing is being built but expensive shit! Nobody is building 1500 sqft homes for 100/sqft, it's all 2000+sqft homes for 500k+, or 7+ story apartment complexes for the above prices. Literally constant construction, all expensive as shit.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
But nothing is being built but expensive shit! Nobody is building 1500 sqft homes for 100/sqft, it's all 2000+sqft homes for 500k+, or 7+ story apartment complexes for the above prices. Literally constant construction, all expensive as shit.
Right. So most new cars are expensive, and rich people buy new cars. What happens to the cars the rich people used to own?
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
Right. So most new cars are expensive, and rich people buy new cars. What happens to the cars the rich people used to own?
They sell them for used prices.

Spoiler: There's no such thing as used prices for homes. They go up every year.

For the record, my local housing and economic development committee agrees with me.
1701650900972.png
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
They sell them for used prices.

Spoiler: There's no such thing as used prices for homes. They go up every year.

For the record, my local housing and economic development committee agrees with me.
View attachment 89824
Yes, because the government constrains supply.

So yes - the rich people buy the fancy new houses and then they sell their old new houses for cheaper.

Are you saying supply and demand does not apply for housing?
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
Yes, because the government constrains supply.

So yes - the rich people buy the fancy new houses and then they sell their old new houses for cheaper.

Are you saying supply and demand does not apply for housing?
Where are you seeing the rich sell old houses for cheaper? Name a single county in the united states where housing prices have dropped from purchase price to later sale price since 2008/2009.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
It’s a dark and depressing place where people have lost the plot so completely that they think the results of banning housing are really the results of constructing housing.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,627
54,579
136
Where are you seeing the rich sell old houses for cheaper? Name a single county in the united states where housing prices have dropped from purchase price to later sale price since 2008/2009.
Because.

Housing.

Constriction.

Is.

Banned.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,170
16,313
146
It’s a dark and depressing place where people have lost the plot so completely that they think the results of banning housing are really the results of constructing housing.
I've got no issue with housing being built, and it shouldn't be 'banned'.