So whats the deal with Bose?

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Originally posted by: Staples
I think the hatered towards them is blown way out of porportion because they are supposedly good speakers. As far as my experience, I think they sound pretty good but I am no audiophile.

I agree with your assesment of the hatred towards them...if they were not the most most popular brand out there and they did not command their full retail price then I assure you no one would even mention them, however since they have such a great marketing dept, had a few niche products that did well in the past, and are one of if not the best known speaker brand in the world...well look at the flak Intel and Nvidia go through because of their popularity with the masses...look at what happened to 3dfx before when they were on top.

With their sound I feel that if you add a decent subwoofer to their systems then they can sound ok for movies and such, much better than the lower end sony's, panasonics and such that you get at BB or CC...but for music they will still be lacking and many audiophiles obsess over music wheras I am more of a movie and video game person.

A really good looking system IMHO is the canton movie 6, look just like the Bose acoustimass 6 system only has a larger center channel which most likely does better for vocals and has a true sub woofer with it....the movie 10 is nice as well and comes with a larger sub. I think when I am ready to buy I might go this route.
 

element

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,635
0
0
Say what you will about Bose, (and a lot of it is true) but I've got another gripe. Audiophiles that pay $2000 for a speaker cable, and/or $300 for a power cable. There is more than one type of sucker out there and there's one born every nanosecond it seems.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Originally posted by: element
Say what you will about Bose, (and a lot of it is true) but I've got another gripe. Audiophiles that pay $2000 for a speaker cable, and/or $300 for a power cable. There is more than one type of sucker out there and there's one born every nanosecond it seems.

nah, I make my own power cables - much better and only cost 30 bucks.
 

flot

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2000
3,197
0
0
Originally posted by: element
Say what you will about Bose, (and a lot of it is true) but I've got another gripe. Audiophiles that pay $2000 for a speaker cable, and/or $300 for a power cable. There is more than one type of sucker out there and there's one born every nanosecond it seems.

There is a big difference. Eventually you reach a price point with your gear that you'll do anything to try to get to the next level.

Using $500 interconnects/speaker wire is awfully similar to the guys who water cool their PCs.

It's actually pretty similar - it's just another hobby that sucks you in. There's a lot of experimenting with various things, A/Bing different setups, finding other audio geeks and comparing systems/experiences with them, etc.

Been there, done that, kept the $300 speaker cable to remind me not to do it again. (looks like a garden hose hooked up to my 8" bookshelfs!)
 

thomsbrain

Lifer
Dec 4, 2001
18,148
1
0
there have been a few ok bose systems in the past. i own one! but for the most part, bose makes crap. not just overpriced, but actually BAD. i was appalled when i demoed their stuff with my own CD's. however, the wave radio does sound good for the size, and the acoustimass-3 system sounded excellent and fit my needs so i bought it. i still really like the sound of that system, it's very smooth and paired with an active sub it sound big. but when you really want to rock, it can't put out enough volume from those tiny drivers.

they are the laughing stock of the live sound industry, too. even peavey gets more respect than bose. they live in a fantasy land where rock and roll doesn't exist.
 

damonpip

Senior member
Mar 11, 2003
635
0
0
Well, what would you choose?

Bose Lifestyle 28 DVD Home Theatre System - $2,299.00

or

Polk Audio PSW505 12" 300-watt Powered Subwoofer +
2x Polk Audio RTi6 Cherry Pair Bookshelf/Stand Mount Speakers (Fronts/Rears) +
Polk Audio CS2 Cherry Center Channel Speaker +
Onkyo TX-SR502S Silver 6 Channel Home Theater Receiver +
Pioneer DV-578A-S Silver Single Disc DVD Player +
Phoenix Gold HT Wire Kit Front, Center and Surround Speaker Wire +
Arista 18-5106A 6-ft. Toslink - Toslink and Mini Adapter
All for ~$1850 from Crutchfield, which has the same functions as the Bose, but sounds so much better
 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
Ah ... the thread goes on ....

Of course you all realize you are arguing over subjective material. Noone defending for or against a specific system or company is correct.

It really boils down to: If it sounds good to you, and you have the money and are willing to spend it, then go for it.

Is Bose an excellent sound system? Yes it is, if it's the one you decided to buy, for whatever reason (up, and including, your wife/mother/SO/partner telling you " OH no you are NOT going to put those Big, Nasty, Ugly-Ass speakers in MY living (TV, Family, Bed) room ... let's get the cute little speakers from Bose.")

There are people that the quality of boom-box audio is wasted on. Live with it. Life is a compromise. Some folks have to use downsized equipment to maintain harmony of another sort.

You couldn't give me much of the equipment mentioned ... you couldn't PAY me to take it. I used to be a bench tech, I've seen how "well" it's constructed (including speaker repair &amp; construction).

Consumer sheep-ism has many avenues. Just because you aren't on one of 'em doesn't mean you're not on another.

SO, go ahead, point &amp; giggle ... keep in mind that someone else is (probably) pointing and giggling at you for probably the same reason. That's the nature of subjective decisions.

There's more to any system than specifications. You have to go with what matches your taste in sound &amp; music, the environment, and the cashflow.

(and, no, I don't own any major Bose equipment - just my aviation headset and 10 year old Wave)

To answer the OP's question: Many people hate Bose only because they've heard other people speak against it. They're generally weak and afraid that if they express an opposite opinion that other people won't like 'em.

If you've listened / viewed and don't like the sound / video, then don't buy 'em; if you like it and have the money, inclination, (and approval from the wife, SO / partner) then get it, enjoy it, and tell anyone else that doesn't that they can take a hike (and that applies to any audio / video system, not just Bose).

Them's my .02

Scott



 

yhelothar

Lifer
Dec 11, 2002
18,409
39
91
To answer the OP's question: Many people hate Bose only because they've heard other people speak against it. They're generally weak and afraid that if they express an opposite opinion that other people won't like 'em.
Well said, that goes true for pretty much everything else here.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: ScottMac
To answer the OP's question: Many people hate Bose only because they've heard other people speak against it. They're generally weak and afraid that if they express an opposite opinion that other people won't like 'em.
I disagree with this assessment, and have already offered a sound, logical, and inarguable opinion for why I don't and won't buy Bose. And that is that, relative to other comparable systems, Bose is overpriced.

 

gabemcg

Platinum Member
Dec 27, 2004
2,597
0
76
I wouldnt be caught dead with BLOSE speakers, but then again, I have two pairs of the Dynaudio Audience 72's. If you want consumer grade, get sony, infinity, polk audio, or Klipsch. If you want PROsumer, get Harmon Kardon, or higher end Klipsch, Polk, or Infinity. If you want Audiophile, get Dynaudio, M&amp;K, B&amp;K, among others.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
985
126
Originally posted by: bozack
I am going to double quote ya PC since I hate having to post twice if unnecessary....


Originally posted by: Pacfanweb

None of the above qualify as "really good quality sound", but I'll still maintain that the mainstream HITB's sound better than the Bose HT's that cost quite a bit more.

Sony, maybe not, then again, nobody ever said Bose was the worst thing you can buy, just that you can blow Bose crap away for the same money.
I'll still take any Yamaha, Pioneer, or Onkyo HTIB over a Bose that costs several hundred more. You'll have more bass with the HTIB's sub, and you'll be a lot farther ahead in terms of surround sound processing.

Agreed but dependant on what your basis for comparison is, if you are comparing them to your TV speakers and the like then I would argue that yes they are "really good" but if you are trying to compare them to the gigantic and IMHO hideous Martin Logan setups then no they sound like poo.

However I will still have to disagree on your mainstream HTIB comment unless you are specifically referring to the Onkyo or anything larger than a bookshelf setup as from my personal experience all of the HTIB systems using small speakers (Sony, Panasonic and a few others) sound like absolute crap, while you might get a good deal more bass from them (and also not at all the best way to gauge a systems performance) their overall sound is flat and crappy...again my personal opinion here.

Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
So evidently, YOU haven't demoed anything, you're just going on what people tell you.
And what do you mean by "the only reason someone like you would argue they "blow" the bose systems away is because it is impossible NOT to take price into account...."
You have no idea who I am, or what I have for a HT setup.
I have personally listened to many of these systems, including the bose....which is setup in stores in a way you'll never duplicate at home.
Until you listen to a system IN YOUR HOME, you won't know what it sounds like.
I have yet to see a HTIB by Pioneer, Yamaha, Onkyo that costs 400 or more that isn't superior in every way, sound-wise, to the bose systems costing hundreds more.

No wonder bose doesn't publish their specs.


I cut out your specs and your edit to shorten this up a bit......

So now you are an expert on what I have and haven't done, I forgot that you spend every minute of the day following me around and cataloging my life good to know that when my time comes you will be able to put together a nice biography.

Like I said I have demoed more than a few ht setups in my period of looking, from mirage, canton, NHT, Klipsch, HSU specifically the VT 12 and the Ventriloquist sats/center, Mirage Omnisats, Bose Acoustimass 6-10-15....many a time this was a direct a-b comparison as the store did not have a bose demo room, a few were demoed in CC and BB which I admit is not the best place but what was available at the time....

With regards to you and the price comment, honestly it doesn't matter what you have at home or how much you are willing to spend as it is highly obvious that you are a biased individual and your bias is against bose, not that there is anything wrong with that....but if you have a predisposition towards something because of what you have read or how you feel than any slight discrepentcy that favors Your opinion will be exploited plain and simple.....like I have said, not only have I listened to these systems against each other and against Bose but I have spoken with many who are very very knowledgable in the field of HT and what not and ALL agree that the cheap HTIB from Sony, Panasonic, Yamaha and others sound like absolute trash....trash, and while the Bose to them and myself does sound better it does not sound better enough to justify the price jump from the lower cost japanese systems. The only exception is the Onkyo HTIB which is truly a good value for the money when compared to others but again this is a bookshelf based system which IMHO isn't a good comparison simply because the speakers are much larger...I compare like for like.

With the Setup issue, read my comment above..there are more than a few stores which do not have Bose listening rooms and also do not have bose advanced equipment running the systems, I know for a Fact that the local Tweeters hook their Bose sytems up to the same equipment using the same wires and everything else as they do their other systems, heck in many cases their sales people will try to sell you something other than bose if you show even the slightest bit of interest in learning more...

And for your last point, as I said above I agree in part with the Onkyo system however the voice is muddy and hard to hear...but the Pioneer and Yamaha systems are garbage plain and simple along with the Sony setups....

With the specs you published I am curious as to their source...as if it is that intellexuial.net site then my opinion is already known on that one, personally I wouldn't take anything he prints as hard and fast info and most certainly wouldn't quote it as being accurate.

So, it would be safe to say that if you don't care about accurate sound reproduction and you want to spend a lot of money that Bose is the perfect HT system for you?

Sounds like that's what you are preaching.

Sometimes being biased is a good thing! :thumbsup:
 

Philippine Mango

Diamond Member
Oct 29, 2004
5,594
0
0
When you guys say "5 1/4" sub, what do you guys mean by that? I tried measuring my sub and I couldn't find anything that was 5 1/4. What exactally is 5 1/4 when measuring subs?
 

Skiguy411

Platinum Member
Dec 4, 2002
2,093
0
0
Originally posted by: Philippine Mango
When you guys say "5 1/4" sub, what do you guys mean by that? I tried measuring my sub and I couldn't find anything that was 5 1/4. What exactally is 5 1/4 when measuring subs?

They mean the cone on the speaker should be at least 5 and 1/4. Subwoofers are usually anywhere from 8-15 inchs, but only carry the lower frequencies.

Basically the big round part on the main speakers(Left and Right) should be at least 5 1/4.
 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Originally posted by: element
Say what you will about Bose, (and a lot of it is true) but I've got another gripe. Audiophiles that pay $2000 for a speaker cable, and/or $300 for a power cable. There is more than one type of sucker out there and there's one born every nanosecond it seems.

exactly element, heck look at the specs of the system owned by the author of that anti Bose piece, he lists all of his cabeling as Monster....I have had people preach to me that expensive cable was a "must" if one was a to have a high end system, some even went to far as to say your wire should be a proportionate cost to the rest of your setup....

the latest was when I was told I absolutely needed a $150 HDMI to DVI cable....ended up buying the $9 at youdoitelectronics and I'll be damned if I can tell the difference, sure there is no pretty mesh cover over the cable, and the connector isn't all fancy with metal thumbscrews and gold plated, but it works and as far as I can tell it works well....same for my stereo cable from my HD box to my TV...everyone said that expensive was needed, I got a $6 cable from Target that works perfectly.
 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Originally posted by: flot
There is a big difference. Eventually you reach a price point with your gear that you'll do anything to try to get to the next level.

Using $500 interconnects/speaker wire is awfully similar to the guys who water cool their PCs.

It's actually pretty similar - it's just another hobby that sucks you in. There's a lot of experimenting with various things, A/Bing different setups, finding other audio geeks and comparing systems/experiences with them, etc.

Been there, done that, kept the $300 speaker cable to remind me not to do it again. (looks like a garden hose hooked up to my 8" bookshelfs!)

But watercooling can if done right have a positive effect, with speakerwire the uber expensive really doesn't improve the sound much at all in many many instances which makes it a total waste, and monster cable is by far a worse company in terms of ethics (lack thereof) and or business practices yet people still recommend their stuff.
 

mobobuff

Lifer
Apr 5, 2004
11,099
1
81
I have a BOSE Wave Radio, and it sounds really nice. It does have bass, a lot of it, and it's pretty powerful for 2 little 2" speakers. I don't have any experience with their high-end HF home entertainment stuff, but it probably IS overpriced for what it is.
 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
So, it would be safe to say that if you don't care about accurate sound reproduction and you want to spend a lot of money that Bose is the perfect HT system for you?

Sounds like that's what you are preaching.

Sometimes being biased is a good thing! :thumbsup:

I would feel it is safe to say that I personally want the best sound possible from a set of sattelite speakers that come in a package about the size or slightly larger than the bose system and I am indifferent as to who makes it and mainly this system would be used for moives/home theater so accurate reproduction of music and what not is not a primary concern. I have no qlams of spending a decent amount of money (highest I will go is about $900 for the set of speakers) but don't want to "waste" money.

I already said numerous times that I am most likely either going with the canton movie 6 or movie 10....in this thread I was just trying to answer the ops question with observations made from various audio fora.

 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Originally posted by: Philippine Mango
When you guys say "5 1/4" sub, what do you guys mean by that? I tried measuring my sub and I couldn't find anything that was 5 1/4. What exactally is 5 1/4 when measuring subs?

not on the sub, I believe subs should either have 6" 8" or even 10" woofers....with 5 1/4 we are talking about the size of your driver in your main speakers or sattelites.
 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Originally posted by: ScottMac
Ah ... the thread goes on ....

Of course you all realize you are arguing over subjective material. Noone defending for or against a specific system or company is correct.

It really boils down to: If it sounds good to you, and you have the money and are willing to spend it, then go for it.

Is Bose an excellent sound system? Yes it is, if it's the one you decided to buy, for whatever reason (up, and including, your wife/mother/SO/partner telling you " OH no you are NOT going to put those Big, Nasty, Ugly-Ass speakers in MY living (TV, Family, Bed) room ... let's get the cute little speakers from Bose.")

There are people that the quality of boom-box audio is wasted on. Live with it. Life is a compromise. Some folks have to use downsized equipment to maintain harmony of another sort.

You couldn't give me much of the equipment mentioned ... you couldn't PAY me to take it. I used to be a bench tech, I've seen how "well" it's constructed (including speaker repair &amp; construction).

Consumer sheep-ism has many avenues. Just because you aren't on one of 'em doesn't mean you're not on another.

SO, go ahead, point &amp; giggle ... keep in mind that someone else is (probably) pointing and giggling at you for probably the same reason. That's the nature of subjective decisions.

There's more to any system than specifications. You have to go with what matches your taste in sound &amp; music, the environment, and the cashflow.

(and, no, I don't own any major Bose equipment - just my aviation headset and 10 year old Wave)

To answer the OP's question: Many people hate Bose only because they've heard other people speak against it. They're generally weak and afraid that if they express an opposite opinion that other people won't like 'em.

If you've listened / viewed and don't like the sound / video, then don't buy 'em; if you like it and have the money, inclination, (and approval from the wife, SO / partner) then get it, enjoy it, and tell anyone else that doesn't that they can take a hike (and that applies to any audio / video system, not just Bose).

Them's my .02

Scott

The best quote which I got that addresses this is:

Honestly, what are we achieving with this thread? Essentially we are indulging in a cathartic "two minutes of hate" reminiscent of 1984; we are opportunistically branding the perceived "elite" as ignorant, thereby elevating ourselves in our own minds above the perceived "well-to-do" with our innate wisdom.

Who am I to shatter someone?s happy little reality with reckless aspersions of a material possession they cherish? In fact, one might well acknowledge that they are in a better position than I; they do not lust after such items the same way I do, nor do they fault the items currently in their possession for "blatant" inadequacies. They have reached a state of contentment, whereas I have not. What more could one yearn for?
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
985
126
Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
So, it would be safe to say that if you don't care about accurate sound reproduction and you want to spend a lot of money that Bose is the perfect HT system for you?

Sounds like that's what you are preaching.

Sometimes being biased is a good thing! :thumbsup:

I would feel it is safe to say that I personally want the best sound possible from a set of sattelite speakers that come in a package about the size or slightly larger than the bose system and I am indifferent as to who makes it and mainly this system would be used for moives/home theater so accurate reproduction of music and what not is not a primary concern. I have no qlams of spending a decent amount of money (highest I will go is about $900 for the set of speakers) but don't want to "waste" money.

I already said numerous times that I am most likely either going with the canton movie 6 or movie 10....in this thread I was just trying to answer the ops question with observations made from various audio fora.

See, I'd rather spend the same and have large main speakers and a large center channel speaker that reproduces sound accurately. I have a 50" RPTV that pretty much dwarfs the floorstanding speakers I have. They don't look bad at all IMO and they sound great. I paid $599 for my main speakers and I think it was around $300 for the center, $250 for the sub, $100 for the rears and $600 for the receiver. I bargained for most of this equipment, did a bunch of research and was able to get some discounts so I didn't pay full retail price for any of this stuff.

Would I like them to be smaller? Yes. Would I sacrifice sound quality to have smaller speakers? No.
 

RichPLS

Senior member
Nov 21, 2004
477
0
0
Some awesume info about Bose. I always thought the Lifestyle/Acoustimass systems were cheaply made, but I do like the 201's which I own, the 301's and 901's
 

bozack

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2000
7,913
12
81
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus

See, I'd rather spend the same and have large main speakers and a large center channel speaker that reproduces sound accurately. I have a 50" RPTV that pretty much dwarfs the floorstanding speakers I have. They don't look bad at all IMO and they sound great. I paid $599 for my main speakers and I think it was around $300 for the center, $250 for the sub, $100 for the rears and $600 for the receiver. I bargained for most of this equipment, did a bunch of research and was able to get some discounts so I didn't pay full retail price for any of this stuff.

Would I like them to be smaller? Yes. Would I sacrifice sound quality to have smaller speakers? No.

And this is where we should agree to have different tastes/priorities....

I myself live in a townhouse with a finished basement, while I have the room for larger speakers I personally wouldn't want them as they would dwarf my 34" Sony standard direct view tube TV and also I would have the potential to piss off my neighbors. I want something very small that conceals easily (read wall mount) and takes up little to no room which provides a 5.1 experience for movies and videogames. Already your budget or what you spent is much more than I am willing to consider as my total budget for speakers is at most $700 and the reciever $300...

and I am willing to sacrifice overall sound quality for something that meets my small requirement and I realize that I am making a sacrifice as long as it sounds better than the speakers in my TV and has a little bass then I am cool.
 

AmphibSailor

Golden Member
Feb 15, 2002
1,399
5
81


Some awesume info about Bose. I always thought the Lifestyle/Acoustimass systems were cheaply made, but I do like the 201's which I own, the 301's and 901's

I was about to say the same. I love my 901's, and my 4.2's.... I'm going to stick with my setup. Its traveled over 20,000 miles with me over the last 10-11 years and is still kickin... with my "Cheap Ass" Yamaha component system I hand picked about 11 years ago when I lived in Japan. :eek: You folks are really passionate about your music, home theatre...etc. Me...Well I never could hear very well, anyway.

:p
 

Jason Clark

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
5,497
1
0
I have to agree with most people here, Bose is overpriced and under sound. I've always been partial to PSB speakers up here in Canada, great speakers at a reasonable price. Far far and away a better speaker than Bose. I'm using a set of Image 5T's up front and they are a beautiful sounding speaker. Shop around, you can do a heck of alot better than bose for alot less money. Boston Acoustics, JBL, Klipsch (on occasion), PSB to name a few.
 

llamajizz

Golden Member
Apr 25, 2004
1,194
0
76
My mom is a huge bose fan (don't worry, it doesn't run in the family). She has the expensive waveradio thing which sounds pretty nice, she could've got much better for much less but it sounds nice. Not too long ago, she got some bose computer speakers (2.0) for about $80. She's in love with them but they completely suck ass. I don't see how she can say they sound good. When you have them turned up and any bass hits, the volume goes down. My friend's crappy $15 juster speakers sound better than them.