I share a two very personal stories/opinions that may shed some light on this subject and, hopefully get some of you thinking deeper on this subject. And, demonstrate that, opinions are just that and not always - although we might think - thought thru on a reality level.
First, I have my ex-husband suffered 2 massive strokes and now live in a nursing home with total care. Bottome line, he can only speak and move his head. No, he dosen't have all his faculties about him and, yes, he would have probably chosen death (at the time over this state to live in); however, his, "conrtibution to society" is this...he has a daughter that needs him physically to be alive and to share with on several different levels. If he had died or was, for lack of choice of other words, was "put to death" as some may think he has nothing more to contribute and has "put in his time at work, etc." his daughter would suffer, mentally. I think the rest you can all surmize.
Secondly, as a result of this experience, I now suffer from a variety of mental disorders that has made it impossible for me to work and I now am on disability myself. After worked for a major coporation in Public/Government Affairs for several years and working alongside prominent officials, I am not barely able to deal with anyone outside my family. and even at times, outside my home.
I too, will probably never work again and have "done my part." However, again, I have a responsiblity to my children to help them to advance and mature in prosperous adults in the future. Would I rather be dead than endure the mental illness and torture inside at times? HELL YES!!! And I expect to, sometime, be responsible for taking my own life. But, the choice is mine and one I hold onto and believe strongly in.
While others in my family and the medical scene have tried to disuade me and my views on the matter. I consider a "right to die issue" same as anyone else with a terminal illness. Only difference is that mine happens to be mental illness. What's the difference I say? It's my life, decision and no one will stop me when I make that final decision.
So, what I am saying is that, NO, I don't think that is up to anyone of us personally to choose for another family, or family member, who lives and who should die. Or, how long is long enough to allow them to live.
And, I find it funny that you give rights to live to a child that may disabled, etc. to live through teenage years so as to give them a chance to experience life, etc. As, I think most of us would agree that those years may be the hardest for everyone and teenagers are the highest population group to commit(suicide)
Whether it is a baby, a teenager, or, whatever age, each situation is unique and has it's implications that reverberate throughout families, society and government. That's why it's up there with religion on the "not proper to discuss" list to some.
My opinion? I have a personal one for myself and the life that surrounds me and my own. But, I respect any and all opinions of others that are faced with similar situations within their own lives. I learned, and in a big way, that we can never say definitely how we feel on this subject until you are actually faced with it yourself. That, my friends, is why government ALONe should not be responsible for making these type decisions for us.