highland145
Lifer
- Oct 12, 2009
- 43,973
- 6,336
- 136
So he was looking too. Let's see the dash cam video.Well, he would say that as a way to justify himself.
So he was looking too. Let's see the dash cam video.Well, he would say that as a way to justify himself.
Also, do you think b00bs classify as sexual organs?
the guy shouldn't' have been arrested. hopefully he gets off.
So he was looking too. Let's see the dash cam video.
"Above the law" comes to mind.:\That's a good point - shouldn't the officer himself be guilty of possessing child pornography, since his dash cam would have captured it?
That's a good point - shouldn't the officer himself be guilty of possessing child pornography, since his dash cam would have captured it?
So if I was 15 and whipped out my wang in public, then some woman snaps a pic of it, because it's so glorious, would they arrest/fine her? :hmm:
KT
Only the cop. Appears the girls and guy were on the same page.America is like 100 years behind the rest of the developed world in its attitude towards nudity and sex.
Actually, you would be convicted of being a sex offender and put on the list.
Sorry, but generic nudity isn't "child pornography" of any kind. And mere flashing isn't "sexual performance" either. For example, having a cute picture of your kids naked in the bath isn't illegal, because it isn't sexual in any way.*
*Note: I am not a lawyer and am talking out of my ass based on my reputable source of "stuff I've read."
Is women going topless still illegal in America? I think we (Canada) had a court decision that put an end to that two decades ago.