The ambitions for 10 haven’t changed. I mean even though we have had the trials and tribulations with 10, the power and performance and transistor density targets that we set in 2014 remain the same.
We could have taken two approaches, we could have slackened off on the tech specs of 10 nanometers and move towards a faster schedule or we could have maintain the tech specs and basically done the work to get it out on the timeline we talked about. And that’s really because of the resiliency that we have been able to engineer in 14 nanometers.
Intel doesn’t really do a great job in terms of speaking about its manufacturing technology, I think, in that scenario we can become sharper on. But we have had three iterations of 14 nanometers within the last few years. I mean if you look at the performance of the current generation of 14 nanometers shipping products compared to the very first generation from a process-only perspective we have improved that 30% to 40%, so the transistor improvement. I mean that’s kind of like the more so then half in many respects. So, yeah, I think, one thing we should be clear is that we have had multiple iterations of 10 -- 14 nanometers…