woolfe9998
Lifer
Because every human is so rational, even keel and level-headed at all times, they're obviously only going to use these guns for legitimate defensive reasons. And no better example exists of the imminently rational human than the sub-species known as "Florida Man." Like remember that ex-cop in the movie theater who blew that guy away for throwing a bag of popcorn at him? That was freakin awesome!
To the story at hand.
Two Florida men charged with attempted murder after two children shot during road rage incident | CNN
Summary: two Florida men driving side by side, one apparently cuts the other off. So the aggrieved Florida man decides to exercise his 2A rights, pulls out his .45, fires into the other Florida Man's car. He misses the driver, but hits his 4 year old daughter in the leg. She screams. So of course her dad pulls out his phone and calls the police, giving them the other guy's license number..
Oh wait, just kidding! No, after all, this is Florida Man! He pulls out his Glock 9 and fires the entire magazine into the rear of the other vehicle. But like the other guy, he misses the driver, instead hitting the man's 14 year old son in the back, collapsing his lung.
Fortunately, both children survived. But with parents like these, who needs predators?
The reason I highlight this case is that it's important when arguing for gun control to use examples of heat of the moment shootings. Because with a premeditated shoot, they're going to argue the killer would have used a different weapon had the gun not been available. But with these rage shootings, in almost every case the victim would not have been shot had the gun(s) not been present. Let these tards explain how they would have used throwing knives and ended up with the same result. Because knives totally rock when used against people in moving vehicles.
To the story at hand.
Two Florida men charged with attempted murder after two children shot during road rage incident | CNN
Summary: two Florida men driving side by side, one apparently cuts the other off. So the aggrieved Florida man decides to exercise his 2A rights, pulls out his .45, fires into the other Florida Man's car. He misses the driver, but hits his 4 year old daughter in the leg. She screams. So of course her dad pulls out his phone and calls the police, giving them the other guy's license number..
Oh wait, just kidding! No, after all, this is Florida Man! He pulls out his Glock 9 and fires the entire magazine into the rear of the other vehicle. But like the other guy, he misses the driver, instead hitting the man's 14 year old son in the back, collapsing his lung.
Fortunately, both children survived. But with parents like these, who needs predators?
The reason I highlight this case is that it's important when arguing for gun control to use examples of heat of the moment shootings. Because with a premeditated shoot, they're going to argue the killer would have used a different weapon had the gun not been available. But with these rage shootings, in almost every case the victim would not have been shot had the gun(s) not been present. Let these tards explain how they would have used throwing knives and ended up with the same result. Because knives totally rock when used against people in moving vehicles.
Last edited:
