• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Scholars Question Cheney's Role in 9/11

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Lunatic

A lunatic (colloquially: "loony") is commonly used term for a person who is mentally ill, dangerous, foolish or unpredictable, a condition once called lunacy.

The word is borrowed via French from Latin "lunaticus", which gains its stem from "luna" for moon, which denotes the traditional link made in folklore between madness and the phases of the moon. This probably refers to the symptoms of cyclic mood disorders such as bipolar disorder or cyclothymia, the symptoms of which may also go through phases. As yet there is little evidence for any causal link between phases of the moon and the progression of mood disorder symptoms.

In a 1999 paper, Raison et al. put forward the interesting hypothesis that the phase of the moon may in the past have had an effect on bipolar patients by providing light during nights which would otherwise have been dark, and affecting susceptible patients through the well-known route of sleep deprivation. With the introduction of electric light, this effect would have gone away, as light would be available every night, explaining the negative results of modern studies. They suggest ways in which this hypothesis might be tested.

Mental institutions used to be called "lunatic asylums" or colloquially, "loony bins" (the latter term is still occasionally used both humorously and insensitively).

In Russian, a lunatic refers to a sleepwalker, literally "one who walks under the moon" or "moonwalker".

People can be offended by the terms 'loony' and 'lunatic', and euphemistic neologisms are often used instead. But it can also connote flamboyance and joviality, as in the popular image of Screaming Lord Sutch of the Official Monster Raving Loony Party, who was bipolar.

 
Originally posted by: Squisher
Lunatic

The irony. I'm betting you haven't even looked at the evidence presented. If so, try countering... if you can actually find evidence to prove these claims to the contrary 🙂

I'm betting you can't, and you're going to run away from the thread like alchemize.
 
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
too funnyyee...

Still nothing concrete to back up what you saying..

Miami.com thats no proof that a columnists report...rofl too funnyee

Then you have the Fox News stuff....
I sait to myself what the hay....students being interviewed to give there opinion is not proof!! A documentry by 3 students all 3 are Sunni`s....hmmm..lolol
rofl....this get funnier by the minute...


Rofl I`m laughing to hard to type...

So they say the plane wasn`t a passenger plane,,,,,
Where are all the pasengers on those planes...
They say a plane didn`t crash into the pentagon...
Where are the passengers...
Where did they put large parts of the plane...too funyee

Then they try to dispute the laws of Science.......heats,vaporization...too funnyeee

You have 3 students who have a documentry...no preofessional experience between the 3...no credential whatsoever....just conjecture and misrepresentation!!

The reason we can`t reason with these people is becuase they actually believe that their so called facts are true.....rofl

Even the NEWS station that posted the documentry..calls those 3 kids the creators...rofl...
He has brought more to the table then you could ever hope to find with hours of searching on Google, so I would shut up about and bring some stuff of your own to this thread before you start calling (amoung other things) the testimonies of an official who saved lies that day while you were getting fat sitting on your ass just watching it. You don't know crap and notorious is making you and your thread hijacking chromies look like fools. So keep laughing your ass off, I'm laughing twice as hard at you guys mentioning pie instead of showing me a passenger manifest of the Pentagon flight.

Also, those "Sunni kids" :roll: (racist bigot much?) did not dispute any Scientific laws, they proved the melting point of the metal COULD NOT BE REACHED by burning jet fuel, it didn't even come close to it's burning point and you can SEE most of the fuel splashing out and away from the building after the crash.. more then %50 probably didn't even burn.

I'm glad you're calling people like notorious and voitingisanillusing stupid or looney, because when more information starts coming out and more people start believeing like with JFK, it will make you people look like even bigger fools for not opening your mind in the first place. So keep laughing, hijacking, and talking about pie. I am so glad I'm not you, you remind me of those ancient Chinese civilizations that thought a dragon was swallowing the sun when there was a solar eclipse.
 
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
too funnyyee...

Still nothing concrete to back up what you saying..

Miami.com thats no proof that a columnists report...rofl too funnyee

Then you have the Fox News stuff....
I sait to myself what the hay....students being interviewed to give there opinion is not proof!! A documentry by 3 students all 3 are Sunni`s....hmmm..lolol
rofl....this get funnier by the minute...


Rofl I`m laughing to hard to type...

So they say the plane wasn`t a passenger plane,,,,,
Where are all the pasengers on those planes...
They say a plane didn`t crash into the pentagon...
Where are the passengers...
Where did they put large parts of the plane...too funyee

Then they try to dispute the laws of Science.......heats,vaporization...too funnyeee

You have 3 students who have a documentry...no preofessional experience between the 3...no credential whatsoever....just conjecture and misrepresentation!!

The reason we can`t reason with these people is becuase they actually believe that their so called facts are true.....rofl

Even the NEWS station that posted the documentry..calls those 3 kids the creators...rofl...
He has brought more to the table then you could ever hope to find with hours of searching on Google, so I would shut up about and bring some stuff of your own to this thread before you start calling (amoung other things) the testimonies of an official who saved lies that day while you were getting fat sitting on your ass just watching it. You don't know crap and notorious is making you and your thread hijacking chromies look like fools. So keep laughing your ass off, I'm laughing twice as hard at you guys mentioning pie instead of showing me a passenger manifest of the Pentagon flight.

Also, those "Sunni kids" :roll: (racist bigot much?) did not dispute any Scientific laws, they proved the melting point of the metal COULD NOT BE REACHED by burning jet fuel, it didn't even come close to it's burning point and you can SEE most of the fuel splashing out and away from the building after the crash.. more then %50 probably didn't even burn.

I'm glad you're calling people like notorious and voitingisanillusing stupid or looney, because when more information starts coming out and more people start believeing like with JFK, it will make you people look like even bigger fools for not opening your mind in the first place. So keep laughing, hijacking, and talking about pie. I am so glad I'm not you, you remind me of those ancient Chinese civilizations that thought a dragon was swallowing the sun when there was a solar eclipse.


Hey brokenvisage... if you save this image to your computer and enlarge it...you can see a reddish / orangish flash where the window is supposed to be. Explosives anyone? 😉

http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem4/1696-01.jpg
 
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: Squisher
Lunatic

The irony. I'm betting you haven't even looked at the evidence presented. If so, try countering... if you can actually find evidence to prove these claims to the contrary 🙂

I'm betting you can't, and you're going to run away from the thread like alchemize.

You're right. Never argue with an idiot. He'll drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.

Low level flashes from a building that might just be a little distressed.

Vast leaps logic trying to interpret the context of a conversation when only hearing one side of the conversation. Aren't a lot of sit-coms based this premise?

 
please take this garbage to P&N - I purposely don't go there to avoid seeing crap such as this conspiracy theory nonsense :roll: I'll betcha none of this stuff would have shown up if a liberal was in office but the left is soooo obsessed with hating bush that they'll come up with craziness such as this. And the pitiful thing is people buy this nonsense. pathetic :roll:
 
Originally posted by: Squisher
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: Squisher
Lunatic

The irony. I'm betting you haven't even looked at the evidence presented. If so, try countering... if you can actually find evidence to prove these claims to the contrary 🙂

I'm betting you can't, and you're going to run away from the thread like alchemize.

You're right.


Whatever you say. I'm daring you to counter with EVIDENCE... but I suppose that's too difficult for you to understand. You should close this thread and run away... it's obvious you aren't capable of examining the evidence presented (your own admission).
 
Oil is bad! W is bad. Bin Laden is good. Cheney is the puppetmaster! Don't mess with him or he will shoot you in the face!

See I can do P&N style too. 😀
 
Originally posted by: SparkyJJO
please take this garbage to P&N - I purposely don't go there to avoid seeing crap such as this conspiracy theory nonsense :roll: I'll betcha none of this stuff would have shown up if a liberal was in office but the left is soooo obsessed with hating bush that they'll come up with craziness such as this. And the pitiful thing is people buy this nonsense. pathetic :roll:

This won't be going back to P&N...so deal with it.

This has nothing to do with politics. It's about Mineta contradicting the official government lie:

Video link to Mineta testimony: http://www.911truthmovement.org/video/hamilton_win.wmv


It's also about controlled demolition at WTC. If you think it's "nonsense" that the government covered it up...then look at the evidence presented thus far and find something factual to counter it. Otherwise, keep running and spewing "nonsense".


Here's some more "nonsense"..

This one's just for you.


N E W Y O R K, May 1, 2001 In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.

Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.

America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation

The plans had the written approval of all of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and were presented to President Kennedy's defense secretary, Robert McNamara, in March 1962. But they apparently were rejected by the civilian leadership and have gone undisclosed for nearly 40 years.


source: http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

Actual Operation Northwoods documents: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf

 
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
OMG, Cheney kidnapped the Lindbergh baby! :shocked:

I dare you to look at the evidence presented throughout this thread.
I dare you to counter with evidence of your own... that is, if you aren't afraid to do so.

Otherwise, keep making baseless generalizations and run away from the thread like the rest of the doubters 🙂
 
OT isn't a good place for pychotic ramblings

you can't prove something by not not proving it


😕

more tinfoil!!!!!
 
Originally posted by: FoBoT
OT isn't a good place for pychotic ramblings

you can't prove something by not not proving it


😕

more tinfoil!!!!!

You're in denial. Go look at the evidence, and point out how the claims of controlled demolition are false. I'm betting you won't 🙂 It's a common theme with those in denial.
 
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
OMG, Cheney kidnapped the Lindbergh baby! :shocked:

I dare you to look at the evidence presented throughout this thread.
I dare you to counter with evidence of your own... that is, if you aren't afraid to do so.

Otherwise, keep making baseless generalizations and run away from the thread like the rest of the doubters 🙂

But your "evidence" is the truly baseless thing. Why do you think we mock you? Because we approved of Cheney telling all the Jews to stay home that day and him personally shooting missiles into the WTC? :roll:

Stupid rhyme with lupid.. you are the weakest link, goodbye. :laugh:
 
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Hey brokenvisage... if you save this image to your computer and enlarge it...you can see a reddish / orangish flash where the window is supposed to be. Explosives anyone? 😉

http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem4/1696-01.jpg

Yeah, it's fishy and it pains me to even support this theory. I love my country, I love its history, and I love how free we can live, but I refuse to be a pod and believe everything I'm told no matter how many people died or how convoluted the story is. I'm not a Bush hater, I even voted for him in 2000, but it's scary that he could probably get away with any crime because he's in such a powerful family with connections galore.

Look, I hope all this isn't true. I hope this is just a bunch of nonsense. But what happened was too big to be orcistrated by terrorists alone in my opinion. Did they ever crash a plane into anything else? I don't think so. Did we do something bad other then living in sin to Al-Queda that prompted this? I don't think so. Did the government perform acts of terror on it's own people in the past to spread fear and premote war in other places? There are signed documents stating so, yes. This is why I believe our own government could be behind this. Call me what you want, I'm pretty thicked skinned here and IRL, but that's my feeling on the matter and none of you arrogant assholes has the right to bash notorious for posting links and voicing his feelings either. He's not putting a gun to your head and telling you to believe him ya'know, he's being more calm about this then I am.
 
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: Crazyfool
OMG, Cheney kidnapped the Lindbergh baby! :shocked:

I dare you to look at the evidence presented throughout this thread.
I dare you to counter with evidence of your own... that is, if you aren't afraid to do so.

Otherwise, keep making baseless generalizations and run away from the thread like the rest of the doubters 🙂

But your "evidence" is the truly baseless thing. :laugh:

What's the baseless evidence? Point it out... specifically. I'm sure you haven't even examined the contents of this thread. Cheney has not been mentioned once with regards to controlled demolition at WTC. You're in denial.
 
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Hey brokenvisage... if you save this image to your computer and enlarge it...you can see a reddish / orangish flash where the window is supposed to be. Explosives anyone? 😉

http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem4/1696-01.jpg

Yeah, it's fishy and it pains me to even support this theory. I love my country, I love its history, and I love how free we can live, but I refuse to be a pod and believe everything I'm told no matter how many people died or how convoluted the story is. I'm not a Bush hater, I even voted for him in 2000, but it's scary that he could probably get away with any crime because he's in such a powerful family with connections galore.

Look, I hope all this isn't true. I hope this is just a bunch of nonsense. But what happened was too big to be orcistrated by terrorists alone in my opinion. Did they ever crash a plane into anything else? I don't think so. Did we do something bad other then living in sin to Al-Queda that prompted this? I don't think so. Did the government perform acts of terror on it's own people in the past to spread fear and premote war in other places? There are signed documents stating so, yes. This is why I believe our own government could be behind this. Call me what you want, I'm pretty thicked skinned here and IRL, but that's my feeling on the matter and none of you arrogant assholes has the right to bash notorious for posting links and voicing his feelings either. He's not putting a gun to your head and telling you to believe him ya'know, he's being more calm about this then I am.

I hear ya...I grew up on patriotic cartoons and Combat with Vic Morrow. My entire family voted Republican 🙂 but they're not blinded to the facts... and neither am I. The common theme with these doubters is that they won't dare examine or counter the evidence presented. It's funny, yet sad.
 
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: noto12ious
Hey brokenvisage... if you save this image to your computer and enlarge it...you can see a reddish / orangish flash where the window is supposed to be. Explosives anyone? 😉

http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem4/1696-01.jpg

Yeah, it's fishy and it pains me to even support this theory. I love my country, I love its history, and I love how free we can live, but I refuse to be a pod and believe everything I'm told no matter how many people died or how convoluted the story is. I'm not a Bush hater, I even voted for him in 2000, but it's scary that he could probably get away with any crime because he's in such a powerful family with connections galore.

Look, I hope all this isn't true. I hope this is just a bunch of nonsense. But what happened was too big to be orcistrated by terrorists alone in my opinion. Did they ever crash a plane into anything else? I don't think so. Did we do something bad other then living in sin to Al-Queda that prompted this? I don't think so. Did the government perform acts of terror on it's own people in the past to spread fear and premote war in other places? There are signed documents stating so, yes. This is why I believe our own government could be behind this. Call me what you want, I'm pretty thicked skinned here and IRL, but that's my feeling on the matter and none of you arrogant assholes has the right to bash notorious for posting links and voicing his feelings either. He's not putting a gun to your head and telling you to believe him ya'know, he's being more calm about this then I am.

I hear ya...I grew up on patriotic cartoons and Combat with Vic Morrow. My entire family voted Republican 🙂 but they're not blinded to the facts... and neither am I. The common theme with these doubters is that they won't dare examine or counter the evidence presented. It's funny, yet sad.
Not even Al Jazeera will examine that preposterous nonsense. :laugh:

Nobody is buying your conspiracy theory.


 
Not even Al Jazeera will examine that preposterous nonsense. :laugh:

Nobody is buying your conspiracy theory.

Perhaps they haven't found about these explosions. Here's an idea... you should forward the contents of this thread to Al Jazeera, and every other major news media outlet in the country 🙂

Nobody is buying "my" conspiracy theory? The Miami Herald, Utah Deseret News, and Fox News seem to be buying it 🙂

A former Bush team member seems to be buying it.
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm

 
In fact, the photo reveals only the Boeing's right fairing, a pronounced bulge that contains the landing gear. He concludes that sunlight glinting off the fairing gave it an exaggerated look. "Such a glint causes a blossoming (enlargement) on film," he writes in an e-mail to PM, "which tends to be amplified in digital versions of images--the pixels are saturated and tend to 'spill over' to adjacent pixels." When asked about pods attached to civilian aircraft, Fred E. Culick, professor of aeronautics at the California Institute of Technology, gave a blunter response: "That's bull. They're really stretching."
 
Back
Top