Schiff Issues Subpoena for Whistleblower Complaint Being Unlawfully Withheld

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
Pelosi is likely the reason. Reportedly she is dead set on not rocking the boat so Trump can do anything he likes without interference. This is to win the 2020 election and is dumb AF simply because this allows Donnie an opportunity to bribe nations if he wishes with no consequences. It's getting to the point where I believe Dems are just going to roll over and play dead, maybe yipping like one of those little rat dogs.

As a mostly Democrat voter and nearly a life long Democrat I agree. The House & Party aren’t doing enough and what they do attempt is ineffective.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,226
55,776
136
Giuliani: I never asked Ukraine to intervene in the Biden investigation. Hell yes, I asked Ukraine to intervene in the Biden investigation and if Trump did do this, it was fine to do. Wtf!

So, Trump is pressuring Ukraine to interfere in the general election.

Obvious question: how extreme is cooperation w/ his friends who don’t need to be blackmailed: Russia, Saudi Arabia, North Korea?

Does anyone think the information that Trump attempted to collude with the Ukrainians to interfere in the 2020 election will give any pause to the folks claiming that Trump attempting to collude with the Russians to interfere in the 2016 election was ridiculous?

Trump asks if anyone is dumb enough to believe that he would do something like is being alleged. The real question is does anyone believe that HE is dumb enough to have done it. Its a subtle difference but the first option implies that "you" are dumb if you believe it. I think we all know what the answer to the second question is.

What will Republicans do? Susan Collins will say she's deeply troubled and then sit on her hands. Moscow Mitch will say since the funds for election security were released there is nothing to the story because he probably knows Putin's cronies have their hooks firmly embedded in the US electoral machinery. So no harm in releasing the funds . Lindsey Graham will wipe the orange semen from his chin and say nothing to see here, move right along.

It really is amazing that the guys who totally didn't collude with a foreign power to win the 2016 election got busted trying to collude with a foreign power to win the 2020 election.

I don't think it will give any pause to those people thought because let's be honest - they all know Trump was colluding with the Russians in 2016 or at least attempting to do so. They just lie about it because it's embarrassing and because it casts doubts on the election's legitimacy and they don't want that.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,907
6,789
126
Laurence Tribe says that if the President is actually immune from criminal charges while in office then he must be removed immediately so he can be charged. Like everything Trump touches, American democratic traditions, dependent on a law respecting leader, have turned to dust. To save what is left of our party means the Republican enablers of criminality must be brought down. Who could have imagined that the simpering suck nut ingrates who make up our rising generations would have their chance at greatness. The 2020 election will tell us how they do. Well know pretty soon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,818
33,443
136
As a mostly Democrat voter and nearly a life long Democrat I agree. The House & Party aren’t doing enough and what they do attempt is ineffective.
The answer is simple but Dems have yet to have the stones.

Another subpoena is ignored? Get the Sgt at Arms of the House and other security to start arresting motherfuckers. They have the authority and believe me, people will start talking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,407
136
The answer is simple but Dems have yet to have the stones.

Another subpoena is ignored? Get the Sgt at Arms of the House and other security to start arresting motherfuckers. They have the authority and believe me, people will start talking.

Agreed
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,359
4,640
136
Pelosi is likely the reason. Reportedly she is dead set on not rocking the boat so Trump can do anything he likes without interference. This is to win the 2020 election and is dumb AF simply because this allows Donnie an opportunity to bribe nations if he wishes with no consequences. It's getting to the point where I believe Dems are just going to roll over and play dead, maybe yipping like one of those little rat dogs.

I begin to wonder if Pelosi is intentionally throwing this election? Let me explain my reasoning.

She is not that dumb. She knows that the Republicans make plans so that the majority of the fallout of the shit they do falls on the next administration. Based on Trumps trade wars, complete lack of foreign policy, and the complete lack of financial responsibility the Republicans have been showing it is fairly reasonable to assume that the fallout of this Administration is going to be bad, and is going to come before the end of the next Presidential term. Whoever is the next President is going to have to own the shit the Republicans are doing now. So, perhaps Pelosi is betting that if the Republicans have to own all of this it might just be enough to end them, or at least force a major change in their current course.

It is just some theory crafting to try to figure out why she might be so against doing anything against this administration. Perhaps her real goal is to give them enough rope, and them leave them holding it.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,226
55,776
136
I begin to wonder if Pelosi is intentionally throwing this election? Let me explain my reasoning.

She is not that dumb. She knows that the Republicans make plans so that the majority of the fallout of the shit they do falls on the next administration. Based on Trumps trade wars, complete lack of foreign policy, and the complete lack of financial responsibility the Republicans have been showing it is fairly reasonable to assume that the fallout of this Administration is going to be bad, and is going to come before the end of the next Presidential term. Whoever is the next President is going to have to own the shit the Republicans are doing now. So, perhaps Pelosi is betting that if the Republicans have to own all of this it might just be enough to end them, or at least force a major change in their current course.

It is just some theory crafting to try to figure out why she might be so against doing anything against this administration. Perhaps her real goal is to give them enough rope, and them leave them holding it.

She is not throwing the election. I am certain she is laser focused on winning the next election.

She might have a bad strategy for it, but that's undeniably her goal.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,226
55,776
136
If nothing else, the potential upcoming Supreme Court vacancies would make throwing the coming election sheer insanity.

Also I can't think of almost any time in history where deliberately handing political power to your opponents has proven to be a winning strategy.

There are way too many variables at stake in any given election to think you can accurately predict the circumstances four years later. Because of this you try to win every election.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,679
10,408
136
If nothing else, the potential upcoming Supreme Court vacancies would make throwing the coming election sheer insanity.

I think it’s a foregone conclusion that Clarence Thomas is resigning next June and Mitch will hold immediate hearings on Thomas’ handpicked (meaning Thomas’ wife’s handpicked) Heritage Foundation felon. Trump will get his 3 picks, and God forbid another one if RBG can’t hold out.

Let me put it this way—even with my dual citizenship, I still wouldn’t leave America just because Trump wins the next election. But if gets to put 4 or more partisan hacks on SCOTUS, I’ll be up and gone like a fart in the wind.
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,359
4,640
136
If nothing else, the potential upcoming Supreme Court vacancies would make throwing the coming election sheer insanity.
Also I can't think of almost any time in history where deliberately handing political power to your opponents has proven to be a winning strategy.

There are way too many variables at stake in any given election to think you can accurately predict the circumstances four years later. Because of this you try to win every election.

Both good arguments. You are of course right.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,983
31,539
146
And everybody know that the WaPo has never been wrong before... ever.

So if a newspaper corrects an improperly reported story, they are forever wrong about everything?

It seems you are whole-hog distrusting anything, because they engage in actual journalistic ethics.

This isn't how it works, but it is clear that you have been thoroughly gaslit into believing that news isn't news, facts aren't facts, and you should only ever believe information that sounds close enough to what you already believe, regardless of logic.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,818
33,443
136
So if a newspaper corrects an improperly reported story, they are forever wrong about everything?

It seems you are whole-hog distrusting anything, because they engage in actual journalistic ethics.

This isn't how it works, but it is clear that you have been thoroughly gaslit into believing that news isn't news, facts aren't facts, and you should only ever believe information that sounds close enough to what you already believe, regardless of logic.
That's their strawman. Compare Trump's deliberate lies vs mistakes made by the media
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
16,601
11,410
136
I think it’s a foregone conclusion that Clarence Thomas is resigning next June and Mitch will hold immediate hearings on Thomas’ handpicked (meaning Thomas’ wife’s handpicked) Heritage Foundation felon. Trump will get his 3 picks, and God forbid another one if RBG can’t hold out.

Let me put it this way—even with my dual citizenship, I still wouldn’t leave America just because Trump wins the next election. But if gets to put 4 or more partisan hacks on SCOTUS, I’ll be up and gone like a fart in the wind.

Where's your duality from?
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
"It's none of the People's business if I discuss acts of treason with foreign leaders!"

LOL Trump..
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,818
33,443
136
Trump just had a presser. He chose reporters he knew wouldn't ask about whistleblower. The only only time he opens up to everyone if under the roar of a helicopter where it is almost impossible to ask followup.
 

brandonbull

Diamond Member
May 3, 2005
6,365
1,223
126
She is not throwing the election. I am certain she is laser focused on winning the next election.

She might have a bad strategy for it, but that's undeniably her goal.
Only so much lipstick you can slap on the political pig that is the Democrat party.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Fenixgoon

Hayabusa Rider

Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
Jan 26, 2000
50,879
4,268
126
Only so much lipstick you can slap on the political pig that is the Democrat party.

If the Dems suck then the Reps deserve to be in prison. Trump certainly has been shown to be a criminal, Lyin' Lewandowski notwithstanding
 

alien42

Lifer
Nov 28, 2004
12,878
3,306
136
And everybody know that the WaPo has never been wrong before... ever.

I suppose multiple sources are wrong about this seemingly obvious issue that Giuliani and Trump have now all but admitted to. BTW, opinion columns are just that, opinions, which doesn't mean they're false.

 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,838
20,433
146
Remember how fun draining the swamp was gonna be, and conservatives Uber concern about government transparency? LoL....
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,397
24,618
136
i think what could put this over the edge is if it's true that Trump threatened US aid in order to get dirt on a political opponent. well, the current REpublican traitors will probably excuse that too so what am I thinking