Schiff Issues Subpoena for Whistleblower Complaint Being Unlawfully Withheld

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
From what I'm reading there seems to be a decent chance that this involves Trump telling the new president of Ukraine that in order to improve relations with the US Ukraine should start investigating Trump's domestic political enemies. (ie: Biden) Needless to say that would be astoundingly corrupt and should result in Trump's immediate removal from office as it is selling out US foreign policy for his own personal interests.

Then again this would be colluding with a foreign power to influence a US election, something we all know Trump would never do so it's probably all a hoax.

Trump *is* the State, you silly man. As far as he's concerned, anyway. I'm sure his most devoted followers feel the same way. He is their voice & their salvation! He alone can fix it!
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,226
55,773
136
If that turns out to be the case, holy crap. It's one thing for Trump to make an inappropriate "promise" to a foreign leader. It's within his powers to make stupid promises in foreign policy if he wants to. But if he made a promise in exchange for personal/political gain, that is pure corruption. It's precisely what I believe happened in relation to Putin in 2016. No wonder they are trying to keep this from public view.

I think it is very likely to be something of this nature. As I mentioned before the whistleblowing statute isn't about policy disagreements with the president, which is what some 'stupid promise' would likely fall under. That sort of complaint would be dismissed. Also, since whoever reported this must have known they were setting fire to their career by doing it, whatever happened was apparently serious enough for someone to do that.

I think whatever this is, it's bad.
 

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,242
14,245
136
OK, here's another good kick in the ass. Apparently, the whistleblower statute permits the whisteblower himself to take his complaint directly to Congress, but only if his complaint was deemed not credible by the IC IG! This is because the drafters of the statute never anticipated that a DNI would refuse to hand over a complaint deemed credible by the IC IG. So paradoxically, he may now not be able to present the complaint directly and still be protected by the whistleblower statute because his complaint was deemed credible.


After Trump is out, we have a lot of fixing to do in our system. Especially the parts having to do with the accountability of our elected and appointed officials. I'm tried of the game being rigged in their favor.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,978
31,536
146
Need to see a lot of GOP senators and congresscritters in handcuffs along with the Trump family and toadies once all of this shit is cleaned from the system.

Absolutely astonishing that any of this is tolerated.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
OK, here's another good kick in the ass. Apparently, the whistleblower statute permits the whisteblower himself to take his complaint directly to Congress, but only if his complaint was deemed not credible by the IC IG! This is because the drafters of the statute never anticipated that a DNI would refuse to hand over a complaint deemed credible by the IC IG. So paradoxically, he may now not be able to present the complaint directly and still be protected by the whistleblower statute because his complaint was deemed credible.


After Trump is out, we have a lot of fixing to do in our system. Especially the parts having to do with the accountability of our elected and appointed officials. I'm tried of the game being rigged in their favor.

The committee can grant him a writ of immunity that would stand up in any court. He'd still lose his job, of course, and Trump would bring in a toady.
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
8,028
10,628
136
The inspector general didn't exactly spill his guts. The DOJ "reasoning" on this is that the subject of the complaint is outside of the intelligence community, so the IC whistle-blower law doesn't apply. But the director of central intelligence wasn't supposed to go to DOJ for guidance. The law says he "shall" give it to congress with seven days.

So...The Inspector General, whose job it was to pass the whistleblower complaint to the House Intelligence Committee, advised Adam Schiff he was unable to do so because the Acting DNI forbade him based on some non-existent reasoning given him by the DOJ. There was no reason for the DOJ to become involved. The language in the rule compelling the IG to pass the complaint to the House Intelligence Committee is utterly unambiguous. There's no interpretation of the law to be made by the DOJ.

Since Trump supporters have been propagandized to believe that Russian support is preferable to Democrats winning an election, I doubt it will move the needle for them. Senate Republicans should be thinking long and hard about how this willful and blatant disregard for the rule of law could feel when the shoe is on the other foot, but I doubt they will. They've staked all their hopes on blindly following their lawless leader.

So, here we are. Lord, I hope there are tapes.
 
Last edited:

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
8,028
10,628
136
You have a link?

Edit: I found his here.


If thats it...this is really just the equivalent of “Russia, if you’re listening...” but since it was done clandestine instead of completely in the open, it makes it seem worse. And this time he's got the authority to promise aid, taxpayer money, etc.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,379
24,599
136
If thats it...this is really just the equivalent of “Russia, if you’re listening...” but since it was done clandestine instead of completely in the open, it makes it seem worse. And this time he's got the authority to promise aid, taxpayer money, etc.

I dunno, I think it is far different than his Russia comment during the campaign. It's not that it seems worse, it's taht it is on a whole different level of bad.
 

Uhtrinity

Platinum Member
Dec 21, 2003
2,263
202
106
If thats it...this is really just the equivalent of “Russia, if you’re listening...” but since it was done clandestine instead of completely in the open, it makes it seem worse. And this time he's got the authority to promise aid, taxpayer money, etc.

If that's the case he can't play it off as a joke or sarcasm. Asking another world leader for dirty political favors is another thing. But if the repubs and the DOJ stonewall it could end up as dead as the Mueller Report.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,666
48,249
136
Rudy is on CNN screaming nonsense at Chis Cuomo. So there is something to this then...
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,226
55,773
136
Rudy is on CNN screaming nonsense at Chis Cuomo. So there is something to this then...

I wonder how long until they get to the ‘even if Trump were using US foreign policy to get other countries to attack his domestic political enemies that’s not illegal’
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,666
48,249
136
I wonder how long until they get to the ‘even if Trump were using US foreign policy to get other countries to attack his domestic political enemies that’s not illegal’

When whatever he did comes out, which it will.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Rudy is on CNN screaming nonsense at Chis Cuomo. So there is something to this then...

Rudy already told us that truth isn't truth. There is no truth. It's just whatever they can get people to believe.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Someone on your lawn again?



You voted for this, quit your crying. Tell us again how law and order makes a difference to you. Maybe it's another super secret reason you don't wanna talk about again.

He just wants folks to chase squirrels with him. It brings him great joy when they co-operate.
 
Nov 25, 2013
32,083
11,718
136
Yes, according to the administration’s argument the president can be caught by a member of the intelligence community committing high treason and the president has the legal authority to imprison him for telling anyone about it.

In 2.5 years we have seen the president say he can spend money in direct defiance to the will of Congress, that he can fire federal officials and stop any investigation into criminal activity by himself or his associates, that he can prevent Congress from knowing if he is jeopardizing the national security of the US, and that he can pardon anyone held in contempt by a court for violating the laws at his request.

If this is allowed to go on why bother to have the other two branches of government? This is why I say it is imperative for everyone to vote in 2020. This is a national emergency.

People are looking at the buffon. They don't see what the buffoon is actually managing to accomplish when it comes to the dismantlement of your govt.

Fascism in action.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,905
6,788
126
From what I'm reading there seems to be a decent chance that this involves Trump telling the new president of Ukraine that in order to improve relations with the US Ukraine should start investigating Trump's domestic political enemies. (ie: Biden) Needless to say that would be astoundingly corrupt and should result in Trump's immediate removal from office as it is selling out US foreign policy for his own personal interests.
...........
For a while there I got carried away with the hope it was something Republicans would find to be a serious offense. Thanks for straightening me out on that.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,678
10,404
136
Rudy Giuliani just had another one of his “of course I ordered the Code Red!” moments.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136
Someone on your lawn again?



You voted for this, quit your crying. Tell us again how law and order makes a difference to you. Maybe it's another super secret reason you don't wanna talk about again.


LOL, I only stated the obvious that the speculation on this thread is running wild with what it "might" be. The actual facts as of yesterday was very slim when I posted and even now.
 

pcgeek11

Lifer
Jun 12, 2005
22,394
5,004
136
There is and I’m going to try to be quiet until more is known.
What I do know is the complaint shouldn’t be blocked from the bipartisan intelligence committee and that committee shouldn’t leak the info (provided it’s not something completely outrageous)
It’s well known the President is easily manipulated by praise. Wouldn’t surprise me if he said something to someone he shouldn’t have said it to and what he did makes him look “weak”.
I don’t think it’s going to be something as bold as
give me this land and I’ll give you...
Hey Puti you’re my Bro here’s all the US secret files
MBS this reporter is giving me a hard time, I need you to...


This is all that I'm saying. Lots of speculation when the facts are not known.

I agree the complaint should have been passed along as per direction. I do not know why it wasn't.