Schiff Issues Subpoena for Whistleblower Complaint Being Unlawfully Withheld

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,406
136
Isn't the IC IG supposed to testify in a closed door meeting today with Schiff and the Gang of Eight? I thought that was still happening, regardless of DNI's participation. At the very least, Schiff should have a lot more to go on, but I doubt he'll go into specifics with the public. Maddow is trying to get him on tonight.

Saw this on cnn

  • Today: The intelligence community inspector general will brief the House committee behind closed doors about how it handled the whistleblower complaint.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,225
55,767
136
Another important thing to point out is that when you lodge a whistleblower complaint against the president your career is over no matter you win or you lose so the person doing this thought it was important enough to sacrifice the remainder of their career for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,668
10,390
136
Reports the IG is refusing to detail the whistleblower complaint involving the president to congress despite law requiring them to.

The House really should start arresting people unless we're just giving up entirely on this branch of the government.

Confirmed:

Not sure what’s going on here...this is the same guy who called the whistleblower’s complaint “credible and urgent” and alerted the intelligence committees in the first place. Could just be he wants to follow letter of the law and ensure DNI is providing the report to Schiff. Bypassing that chain might jeopardize his job? Need to see what the Twitter pundits are saying about this.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,626
48,189
136
Confirmed:

Not sure what’s going on here...this is the same guy who called the whistleblower’s complaint “credible and urgent” and alerted the intelligence committees in the first place. Could just be he wants to follow letter of the law and ensure DNI is providing the report to Schiff. Bypassing that chain might jeopardize his job? Need to see what the Twitter pundits are saying about this.

Or has the DOJ threatened to prosecute him in order to protect the president?

Trump himself claims not to have said anything compromising so trying to hide the claim would seem to be pointless unless that's not true. Somebody torched their career to bring this to the IG.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,801
33,420
136
Confirmed:

Not sure what’s going on here...this is the same guy who called the whistleblower’s complaint “credible and urgent” and alerted the intelligence committees in the first place. Could just be he wants to follow letter of the law and ensure DNI is providing the report to Schiff. Bypassing that chain might jeopardize his job? Need to see what the Twitter pundits are saying about this.
Word is DNI had a conversation with DOJ before his position of "I aint talkin'". When asked if Barr was involved, the answer was no comment.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,626
48,189
136
More broadly this is absolutely going to come out eventually the only question is how many illegal things does Trump or the DOJ do trying to stop it.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,225
55,767
136
Reports the IG is refusing to detail the whistleblower complaint involving the president to congress despite law requiring them to.

The House really should start arresting people unless we're just giving up entirely on this branch of the government.

Yes I'm not sure what the Democrats don't understand about this. People will keep stonewalling them because it's effective and there are no consequences. You need to find ways to inflict consequences.

EDIT: Although in this case I suspect what Barr/DOJ told the IG is that he could be sent to prison for revealing it to Congress. I suspect what we're seeing here is at least equally if not totally the corruption of the DOJ at work, not necessarily this guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fanatical Meat

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,052
8,648
136
When you go into the living hell that he Trump admin. is, you go in with the full knowledge that when he's gone and you can no longer rely on his shadow to give you immunity, everyone around you that's not a Trumper will look at you like you got some kind of incurable communicable disease. Sympathy will be the only card left for you to play.

OTOH, the whistle blower will be redeemed. That person will be compensated and made whole for defending the honor and the integrity of the community she/he works in.

The intelligence community is Trump's worst enemy and feared foe because they know what Trump is hiding from everyone else yet can't divulge for the sake of the nation's security. That Trump attacks them on a regular basis, installs sycophants in there to control the outflow of knowledge damaging to him just makes his culpability that much more obvious.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,626
48,189
136
Yes I'm not sure what the Democrats don't understand about this. People will keep stonewalling them because it's effective and there are no consequences. You need to find ways to inflict consequences.

The house should have changed the rules for some committees to be able to hold witnesses in contempt on the spot. If people like Lewandowski were hauled off to a holding cell on national TV we'd see a lot less of this bullshit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,801
33,420
136
The house should have changed the rules for some committees to be able to hold witnesses in contempt on the spot. If people like Lewandowski were hauled off to a holding cell on national TV we'd see a lot less of this bullshit.
I believe they already can
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,686
136
Or has the DOJ threatened to prosecute him in order to protect the president?

Trump himself claims not to have said anything compromising so trying to hide the claim would seem to be pointless unless that's not true. Somebody torched their career to bring this to the IG.

Threats of malicious prosecution from the Trump admin? Say it ain't so!
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,668
10,390
136
Just a point of clarification—intel committees are meeting with the IC IG (Atkinson) today, not the acting DNI (Maguire). IC IG is the same guy who alerted Schiff in the first place and called the complaint “credible and urgent”. He would not be stonewalling for the Administration and he isn’t working with DOJ to bury this. But for some reason he doesn’t want to get into details in a closed door committee hearing with the Congresspeople who have the highest clearance. Maybe he thinks it’s not standard procedure, or maybe he doesn’t want to politicize this.

Either way, confirms that this is a big deal.

FWIW, NBC news today independently confirmed WaPo’s story that the whistleblower complaint involves a phone call the President had.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,801
33,420
136
Who says Trump can't be funny? Hey dummy, anyone remember Russians in the Oval Office??

BTW - Stable genius just confirmed it was him.

“Virtually anytime I speak on the phone to a foreign leader, I understand that there may be many people listening from various U.S. agencies, not to mention those from the other country itself. No problem!” the president wrote in a tweet, calling the controversy “another Fake News story out there.” “Knowing all of this, is anybody dumb enough to believe that I would say something inappropriate with a foreign leader while on such a potentially ‘heavily populated’ call,” he asked.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,626
48,189
136
I didn't say anything compromising because who would be so dumb but no you can't hear what I said so you've got to take my word for it.

A Trumpian defense if ever there was one.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,225
55,767
136
I didn't say anything compromising because who would be so dumb but no you can't hear what I said so you've got to take my word for it.

A Trumpian defense if ever there was one.

The Trump Defense:

tenor.gif
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,626
48,189
136
It has occurred to me that there is a rather high probability that Trump will break the law after he's out of office by blabbing classified info to people.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,905
6,788
126