Pretty good, but you forgot to blame it on a vague universal self-hate.But same-same, no?
'You are guilty of the same thing you accuse the "other side" of doing, because everyone thinks they are right and moral and everyone is equally at fault anyway because you calling out their shitty behavior actually causes their shitty behavior somehow...and #bothsides.' ~Moonbeam, approximately
Don't even drink enough to get high. Clarify where you have a problem, please. I have pretty much agreed with everything you have said here.
...and putting-down of children. Yep, sorry. I'll do better next time, lol.
I am always ready to help you understand this but you haven't yet. It will require. You keep thinking I am both-sideing everything. I am explaining that both sides are the opposite sides of the same thing. Neither has it completely right. Neither has it completely wrong. Both sides disappears from a third perspective that requires a particular conscious experience to see. That experience requires patience, humility, and outside conscious shocks to happen. The problem is grounded in unconscious assumptions we make that we already know the truth. You need an empty tea cup and we have fallen in love with what we think is real tea.But same-same, no?
'You are guilty of the same thing you accuse the "other side" of doing, because everyone thinks they are right and moral and everyone is equally at fault anyway because you calling out their shitty behavior actually causes their shitty behavior somehow...and #bothsides.' ~Moonbeam, approximately
You will put moonbeam on ignore. His drivel is awe inspiring in its fact free self-grandizing and he will never change. Like arguing with water going downhill. No point
Enter the wicked Moonbeam.
I don't understand what you said? You just admitted what Moonbeam said was bullshit.. which was my point, that's it. And yet YOU are the one here arguing with me about What I said calling it absurd.. Maybe if you kept it in the context as it was written in, you wouldn't have such a problem. You are trying to create an argument with me about something that is completely out of context of what I said, and nothing to do with the Moonbeams bullshit. Which you demonstrated by throwing up parts of other posts Moonbeam put up, afterwards, that where not to me, or had anything to do with what I said.
We're done here. You keep posting walls of reactionary bullshit hoping to get insulted and to report a post. I thought moonbeam was talking out of his ass earlier today but it's clear both of you are talking out of your asses. I'm more than happy to buy you both books teaching you how to read and comprehend basic English if it's a skill one or both of you lack.
Did you look in the mirror as you typed that?
Because not countering allows them the breed and multiply. They are cancer.. if left un treated, what happens with cancer? The treatment for these people's bullshit and disinformation, is counter them with actual real facts to help prevent their cancer from spreading.
Comprehension failure on your part?
Here is how I had intended the conversation to have gone just between A/// and me:
Instead of quoting the 'twats post' the last one above, I mistakenly quoted your Post #6 So when I say your complaint that you had not said anything about Christianity I realized I had quoted 6 by mistake. And since it was obvious that I you had said nothing about Christianity but the post that you quoted in 6 did that could have, were you a charitable chap, alerted you to where I made my mistake.
What does a post from 5 years ago, have to do with this discussion and what you said?
I understand a misquote, but if that was truly the case, why did you try to connect the dots and attempt to tie it in with post #6? By not just leaving it at "sorry, it was a misquote", you make it appears you are just trying to save face and it wasn't a misquote.
Your first mistake is believing it's political thinking. It's a form of thinking that has nothing to do with politics and is in every aspect of our lives.Now that's some liberal thinking. Too many liberals can't take it when their sacred cows are attacked. They play the victim card and faint.
Even water going down hill can be redirected down a better path that leads to positive and useful results that is better for society/civilization.
Here is one view on it:
It has nothing to do with what I posted 5 years ago other that to demonstrate, after I said I was being sarcastic, to prove that when you called me a liar for telling you I was being sarcastic, you called me a liar. Apparently you now know I was being sarcastic because you are now complaining about "How was I supposed to know". I don't mind if you didn't know but when I explained that you said I was lying. Don't worry about it. Many others who should have known I was being sarcastic jumped right on your band wagon.
Perhaps what appears to you to be true is based on some motive to which you may not wish to admit. I simply pointed out that since the misquote I made of your post had nothing to do with Christianity but the post you quoted in 6 did, it could have tipped you off that I had misquoted you. I remember a specific recent incidence where someone misquoted someone and they replied I think you meant someone else and not me. That would me a more charitable way to approach such an issue if you felt you were misquoted, I would say. You seem to be extremely defensive as if you walk around easily triggered by guilt.
Why do you say I tie the phenomenon of belief in sacred cows to politics exclusively? I do not. This is a political forum and I was talking about how rationalization to protect the unconscious assumptions that our sacred cows are valid generally applies to liberals as well over those of their sacred beliefs are political in nature. The scientific literature is clear on this. Conservatives do this more than liberals do. If someone does something more than you do you do it too but less frequently.
Facebook
Twitter