Russia on brink of ... NOPE! Russia INVADES Ukraine!

Page 1717 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

mikeymikec

Lifer
May 19, 2011
20,557
15,397
136
  • Haha
Reactions: biostud

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,926
46,370
136
World's worst negotiator still very confused

"Trump says he and Putin will discuss 'dividing up assets' in Ukraine ceasefire talks "



Syphilis dementia is a bitch.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,926
46,370
136
I think you mean he acts like a bitch but he is actually a bastard ;)

Not really, meant it as "a drag", but to him personally yes I also mean bitch. As in, 'Putin moved on him like a bitch.'

He's as subservient as he is delusional, and always complaining he's a victim. That is peak bitch right there.
 
Last edited:

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,926
46,370
136
bafkreicamxxpgtbvhryojw5nlhk3wzxa6owjxiibdwpyyatsuu4j7xxeb4@jpeg
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,926
46,370
136
Orcs playing IDF now, actively hunting children? Kind of hard to mistake a middle school age kid for an adult in combat gear, no?

Disgusting
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,031
9,909
136
I don't know if this has been discussed already but I read a BBC headline this morning which included this line:

""We're already talking about that, dividing up certain assets," [Trump] says"

From:

I'm wondering if Trump and Putin are executing a Mafia style scam along the lines that one group threatens a country (e.g. Ukraine), the other group comes along and says "we'll protect you, but at a cost", then the two groups share the spoils.

I think I already observed that seems to be exactly what they are doing. Vance made the "protection racket" aspect of it quite explicit.


Though I do wonder if perhaps there's an argument for saying that, in the absence of any all-powerful global policeman, nation states will always behave like mafia gangs? The next thought is to what extent that implies them being structured like such gangs internally?
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
35,502
9,724
136
Russia's position is that there can be absolutely no guarantee of peace.
Spoilers, Russia has every intention of letting Trump support the invasion. And if that requires a temporary ceasefire - IT WILL BE TEMPORARY.
All they want is for Ukraine's Allies to abandon it so Russia's invasion would be made easier.

"Attack Ukraine harder" is Russia's only position at the so called "negotiating" table. Russians are not worth talking to. They need to be answered in blood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo

DZero

Golden Member
Jun 20, 2024
1,417
511
96
So, Russia wants US to betray NATO.
Is likely to happen, the issue?
If China sees that Russia wants to be on Trump's hands, will betray Russia too. This is gonna be interesting to see.

Two powers trying to unite by ethnics and being defeated by China and Europe taking down the current world... is a very likely scenario to happen.
 

nickqt

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2015
8,086
8,952
136
I don't know if this has been discussed already but I read a BBC headline this morning which included this line:

""We're already talking about that, dividing up certain assets," [Trump] says"

From:

I'm wondering if Trump and Putin are executing a Mafia style scam along the lines that one group threatens a country (e.g. Ukraine), the other group comes along and says "we'll protect you, but at a cost", then the two groups share the spoils.
It's a hybrid attack plan.

Molotov-Ribbentrop + Putin Mafia State

 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,926
46,370
136
And Washington is mad about Chinese listening posts in Cuba, haha. Now France will do the same in Canada, but they'll be right there.

Of course, small potatoes compared to the skulldoggery that is having Tulsi fucking Gabbard as DNI.



Trying to keep hope we can win back some trust someday. It's hard.


 
  • Like
Reactions: GodisanAtheist
Dec 10, 2005
28,129
12,778
136
And Washington is mad about Chinese listening posts in Cuba, haha. Now France will do the same in Canada, but they'll be right there.

Of course, small potatoes compared to the skulldoggery that is having Tulsi fucking Gabbard as DNI.



Trying to keep hope we can win back some trust someday. It's hard.
Who needs a listening post when Musk installed a Starlink system in the White House?
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,926
46,370
136
Who needs a listening post when Musk installed a Starlink system in the White House?

Spooks who know their shit?

If Starlink were a fitting analog to what I'm talking about, the CIA wouldn't have put up listening posts north to south facing Donestk and Luhansk.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,129
12,778
136
Spooks who know their shit?

If Starlink were a fitting analog to what I'm talking about, the CIA wouldn't have put up listening posts north to south facing Donestk and Luhansk.
Perhaps the meaning and joke was not so clear. Musk and Trump are making it really easy to intercept US communications by degrading IT security and allowing installation of unsecured devices in very secure areas.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,926
46,370
136
Russians are mad as the AFU just launched another offensive. Hey, Putin says you guys are supposed to be surrounded!


"Russian war bloggers claim that the AFU has launched an offensive in the Belgorod direction. They report attacks near the Russian villages of Prilissya, Grafivka, and Demidivka, close to the Sumy region border."
 
  • Like
Reactions: pcgeek11

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
30,926
46,370
136
Perhaps the meaning and joke was not so clear. Musk and Trump are making it really easy to intercept US communications by degrading IT security and allowing installation of unsecured devices in very secure areas.


Not saying Musk and Trump don't represent a lot of risk, I'm saying the kind of info you want about military things isn't all routed through a wireless connection for the White House.

Saying 'why would you need dedicated hardware for spying when Starlink is there?' is kind of like asking 'Why would you need a car if you own a pair of rollerskates?'
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,129
12,778
136
Not saying Musk and Trump don't represent a lot of risk, I'm saying the kind of info you want about military things isn't all routed through a wireless connection for the White House.

Saying 'why would you need dedicated hardware for spying when Starlink is there?' is kind of like asking 'Why would you need a car if you own a pair of rollerskates?'
I was being a bit tongue and cheek. No need to be so literal.