- Oct 9, 1999
- 45,125
- 6,246
- 136
Is it really that quick a guy is served papers, etc.? How long does it take before they are actually in Ukraine, armed and in combat?Imagine being drafted two days ago.
Yesterday you had your refresher course.
Today you on the front of this clusterfuck with a rusty ak in one hand and half empty bottle of vodka in the other.
Time to die.
I really do feel for these poor dudes… its not their fight, some narcissist has just decided they have to die this day.
there were a few reports on the news with video of the conscripts sleeping on the ground for 3 days not being trained and supposedly being shipped to the front in 2 days. so about a week? but there was also the video of recruits shopping in consumer military supply stores to get all the stuff the army wasnt supplying, so they had some time before reporting for training to sit around.Is it really that quick a guy is served papers, etc.? How long does it take before they are actually in Ukraine, armed and in combat?
It varies a lot - some appear to get 30 days "training" before being shipped off, some are drop-shipped immediately. One conscript was documented as captured on the front lines 7 days after his call-up papers last week.Is it really that quick a guy is served papers, etc.? How long does it take before they are actually in Ukraine, armed and in combat?
The Russian air force seems incapable of suppressing the Ukrainian AD. The USAF would have already cratered every AD site.Also Ukraine’s AD still works discouraging high altitude strikes because the Russian pilots aren’t looking to commit suicide.
You don't even need air superiority... HIMARS ftw... again...but if you do gain air superiority, things like the small diameter bomb will shut down any ground vehicles/arty.
SourceBoeing and Saab Group have modified the Small Diameter Bomb with a rocket motor to be launched from ground-based missile systems such as the M270 MLRS.[46] With the Army demilitarizing cluster munitions from M26 rockets, the company says a special adapter case could reuse the rocket to launch the SDB. After the motor launches it to a high enough altitude and speed, the wings will deploy and glide the bomb to its target. The company believes it can fill a gap for long-range precision fires while using its smaller warhead to save larger rocket munitions for strategic targets. While typical MLRS systems follow a ballistic trajectory, the rocket-launched SDB can be launched to an altitude and glide on a selected trajectory.[47][48] Boeing and Saab Group conducted three successful GLSDB tests in February 2015. The system is cost-effective, utilizing an existing weapon paired with a stockpiled rocket motor, while maintaining the loadout on a rocket artillery system. Unlike other artillery weapons, the GLSDB offers 360-degree coverage for high and low angles of attack, flying around terrain to hit targets on the back of mountains, or circling back around to a target behind the launch vehicle. The GLSDB has a range of 93 mi (150 km), and can also hit targets 43 mi (70 km) behind it.[49][50][51] In a 2017 demonstration, the GLSDB engaged a moving target at a distance of 62 mi (100 km).
That much firepower condensed into something so accurate, it's something to behold. It's all the more impressive to the people using it as well - they've all grown up with the understanding that massed Russian artillery and rockets are the most powerful land force on Earth.
It would be very appropriate.
Collisions with the sea bottom happen. Fresh crew, new sub, out of date maps, things happen.
I am sure it will be 100% accidental when both halves collide with the sea floor in an area that is just way to deep for anyone to ever do recovery. If the sub just stops reporting in, who is to know what ever happened or where it went down?
Accidents happen. Especially with submarines. Everyone knows Yuri snuck a pack of cigs onboard.
I doubt we’re talking about them actually having gutted their tank reserves, although I suspect the best of them are gone, and what’s left is labourious to get into fighting shape. Picking spares out of a yard of tanks that have been poorly maintained for decades can’t be an efficient process. Spend a day pulling something, another day installing it, just to find out it’s no better than the original defective part. I would assume the people in the tank depots are at least lazy if not super competent and this are trying to save the easiest tanks in their inventory. Due to the lack of spares, zero production of many parts due to embargo, and generally poor practices the flow of equipment can only get worse, unless they choose to pilfer their units tasked for the imaginary NATO drive on Moscow.Interesting reports Russia has mobilized at least a moderate number of latest T-90M tank forces both in Crimea - that recently came over Kerch bridge to reinforce South (with active tank training ongoing now in Crimea) and now new photo confirming at least 6 in Belgorod close to Ukraine, presumably on way to reinforce or counter-attack at collapsing Luhansk front.
I would note Oryx has only seen 3 visually confirmed kills/captures of this latest T-90M model - out of 1240 odd tanks lost by Russia so far. So the best of the remaining Russian tank army appears to now be mobilized. Whether a last gasp, or the core of a significant new offensive drive, remains to be seen. Russia was thought to have ~100 of these latest tanks pre-war, so overall could be a fairly large armor reinforcement for a new offensive - if Russia can crew and supply them up to the front with proper support.
But Russia has to have gutted the last of their reserve armor divisions to field these...
I think that's exactly what we are seeing right now. The T-90M has been fairly invisible until now in the war, and all of a sudden we're seeing a train full of them shipped to the front line? Sounds like they're digging into the stuff meant to defend the home front.I doubt we’re talking about them actually having gutted their tank reserves, although I suspect the best of them are gone, and what’s left is labourious to get into fighting shape. Picking spares out of a yard of tanks that have been poorly maintained for decades can’t be an efficient process. Spend a day pulling something, another day installing it, just to find out it’s no better than the original defective part. I would assume the people in the tank depots are at least lazy if not super competent and this are trying to save the easiest tanks in their inventory. Due to the lack of spares, zero production of many parts due to embargo, and generally poor practices the flow of equipment can only get worse, unless they choose to pilfer their units tasked for the imaginary NATO drive on Moscow.
All these tanks seem different enough from each other to require a decent amount of training, so that’s another obstacle to efficient use.
What do you want to bet those supplies were all stolen by and are now being re-sold by the Deputy Chairman of the Defense, found in this video posted right before you?
ah capitalism...
How its done is you HARM the enemy anti air installations then from higher than MANPADS can reach your planes be free to go up and down their lines, , using laser guided missiles. But air attacks don't win wars , just good for spot destruction I imagine, leaving aside nukes. Gotta have your boots, boots boots everywhere.It is a bit spectacular how aircraft are ineffective in a modern warfare environment. If you send them in, they get blown out of the sky.
Check out this tune--anyone know the group ?