Rush Limbaugh is a Big Mean Idiot

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Don, I think we shall have to agree to disagree on this issue.

I don't know why I'd want to be that civil, given your entirely uncivil treatment of a very sick man. I don't respect your position, and your unwillingness to acknowledge the mean spirit behind your comment means I can't really respect you either. You're a person who claims to support the troops and the war in Iraq, but could never be bothered to serve. You're a person who claims to be outraged about gay activists outing congressional staffers, in spite of the fact you've done the same thing yourself. You're also a person who can spread vicious innuendo about a terminally ill man and won't even admit he's doing it. In short, you're a hypocrite and, IMO, a very small man indeed.

So I think it's time to find out: who were you before you were banned?

Only person I can think of is Tastes Like Chicken.. but I could be wrong.

 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: dahunan

Only person I can think of is Tastes Like Chicken.. but I could be wrong.

That's a possibility. Condor occurs to me as well (though I'm not sure he was ever banned). He's not angry enough to be Crimson or xxxJohnGaltxxx, smart enough to be CsG, or enough of a dopey post-and-run artist to be Riprorin. I definitely have the sense we've seen him before, though.
 

ProfJohn

Lifer
Jul 28, 2006
18,161
7
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
1. Fox is obviously not off his drugs and looks as if he does not even have Parkinson?s.
Of course Fox is obviously on his drugs in his most recent ads as well.

In case you still don't get it, Fox has now publically said what every medical professional who knows about the subject already knew that his movements in the ad WERE A SIDE EFFECT OF TAKING HIS DRUGS FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE. The way he was acting is not actually caused by the disease itself but by the side effects of drugs for treatment of it.

The more "Prof" John keeps repeating this lame ass talking point from Rush about Fox being "off his meds," despite being proven wrong about a billion times now, the more ignorant he looks. Let him keep doing it!
Do you have PROOF that what we saw in the ad is because he took to much medicine?

From what I have read on here it?s some Doctor who watched the Ad saying that this could be the effect of too much medicine.

Now it seems to me when Frist 'diagnosed" Shivo you guys all freaked out, just scroll back a few pages in this thread to see that effect. But now because some Doctor on TV says this may be what happened you all parrot it as if it is gospel? Am I misread this thread, or are you all doing exactly what you bitched about Rush doing?

?How can Rush tell if he is off his medicine by watching the ad? = bad
?A doctor and others say this is caused by too much medicine, he can tell because he saw the ad.? = good? Huh?
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
1. Fox is obviously not off his drugs and looks as if he does not even have Parkinson?s.
Of course Fox is obviously on his drugs in his most recent ads as well.

In case you still don't get it, Fox has now publically said what every medical professional who knows about the subject already knew that his movements in the ad WERE A SIDE EFFECT OF TAKING HIS DRUGS FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE. The way he was acting is not actually caused by the disease itself but by the side effects of drugs for treatment of it.

The more "Prof" John keeps repeating this lame ass talking point from Rush about Fox being "off his meds," despite being proven wrong about a billion times now, the more ignorant he looks. Let him keep doing it!
Do you have PROOF that what we saw in the ad is because he took to much medicine?

From what I have read on here it?s some Doctor who watched the Ad saying that this could be the effect of too much medicine.

Now it seems to me when Frist 'diagnosed" Shivo you guys all freaked out, just scroll back a few pages in this thread to see that effect. But now because some Doctor on TV says this may be what happened you all parrot it as if it is gospel? Am I misread this thread, or are you all doing exactly what you bitched about Rush doing?

?How can Rush tell if he is off his medicine by watching the ad? = bad
?A doctor and others say this is caused by too much medicine, he can tell because he saw the ad.? = good? Huh?

Both Rush and this Professor guy are off their collective rockers and for once the American Sheeple wake up because they are attacking a well liked actor.

Sadly it shows the priorities of both the Sheeple and Rush/Professor as low as they can go.

rose.gif
for America
 

dahunan

Lifer
Jan 10, 2002
18,191
3
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
1. Fox is obviously not off his drugs and looks as if he does not even have Parkinson?s.
Of course Fox is obviously on his drugs in his most recent ads as well.

In case you still don't get it, Fox has now publically said what every medical professional who knows about the subject already knew that his movements in the ad WERE A SIDE EFFECT OF TAKING HIS DRUGS FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE. The way he was acting is not actually caused by the disease itself but by the side effects of drugs for treatment of it.

The more "Prof" John keeps repeating this lame ass talking point from Rush about Fox being "off his meds," despite being proven wrong about a billion times now, the more ignorant he looks. Let him keep doing it!
Do you have PROOF that what we saw in the ad is because he took to much medicine?

From what I have read on here it?s some Doctor who watched the Ad saying that this could be the effect of too much medicine.

Now it seems to me when Frist 'diagnosed" Shivo you guys all freaked out, just scroll back a few pages in this thread to see that effect. But now because some Doctor on TV says this may be what happened you all parrot it as if it is gospel? Am I misread this thread, or are you all doing exactly what you bitched about Rush doing?

?How can Rush tell if he is off his medicine by watching the ad? = bad
?A doctor and others say this is caused by too much medicine, he can tell because he saw the ad.? = good? Huh?

Take this as an attack if you want.. but.. YOU ARE STUPID IF YOU THINK ANYONE SHOULD LISTEN TO OR BELIEVE ANYTHING RUSH "DRUG ADDICT" LIMBAUGH SAYS

He probably did this just to get our focus off of something more important in the news.. he would always take on up the ass for Republicans
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,755
11,374
136
It's common knowledge to medical professionals that deal with Parkinsons patients that the meds make them shake, whereas they can barely move sometimes when they aren't taking them. This isn't Frist detecting the atrophy level of Terry Schiavo's brain by looking at a super 8 recording. Rush, while he might know a great deal about certain meds, doesn't know dick about this considering he was stating completely the opposite of what would happen if MJF wasn't taking his meds to make the ad have greater effect. I sense great anger in your recent posts, could it be that someone has identified your previously banned handle???
 
Aug 1, 2006
1,308
0
0
Originally posted by: Tab
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Don, I think we shall have to agree to disagree on this issue.

I don't know why I'd want to be that civil, given your entirely uncivil treatment of a very sick man. I don't respect your position, and your unwillingness to acknowledge the mean spirit behind your comment means I can't really respect you either. You're a person who claims to support the troops and the war in Iraq, but could never be bothered to serve. You're a person who claims to be outraged about gay activists outing congressional staffers, in spite of the fact you've done the same thing yourself. You're also a person who can spread vicious innuendo about a terminally ill man and won't even admit he's doing it. In short, you're a hypocrite and, IMO, a very small man indeed.

So I think it's time to find out: who were you before you were banned?

:thumbsup::D

The SMMMMACK heard in space!
 

daveymark

Lifer
Sep 15, 2003
10,573
1
0
leave it to the libs to go off on a tangent that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. Is it that hard to pay attention? Perhaps the posters in here decided since MJF went off his meds one time, so too can the lib posters go off their ADD meds :laugh:

 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
1. Fox is obviously not off his drugs and looks as if he does not even have Parkinson?s.
Of course Fox is obviously on his drugs in his most recent ads as well.

In case you still don't get it, Fox has now publically said what every medical professional who knows about the subject already knew that his movements in the ad WERE A SIDE EFFECT OF TAKING HIS DRUGS FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE. The way he was acting is not actually caused by the disease itself but by the side effects of drugs for treatment of it.

The more "Prof" John keeps repeating this lame ass talking point from Rush about Fox being "off his meds," despite being proven wrong about a billion times now, the more ignorant he looks. Let him keep doing it!
Do you have PROOF that what we saw in the ad is because he took to much medicine?

From what I have read on here it?s some Doctor who watched the Ad saying that this could be the effect of too much medicine.

Now it seems to me when Frist 'diagnosed" Shivo you guys all freaked out, just scroll back a few pages in this thread to see that effect. But now because some Doctor on TV says this may be what happened you all parrot it as if it is gospel? Am I misread this thread, or are you all doing exactly what you bitched about Rush doing?

?How can Rush tell if he is off his medicine by watching the ad? = bad
?A doctor and others say this is caused by too much medicine, he can tell because he saw the ad.? = good? Huh?

Do you or Rush have proof of ANYTHING that occurred with regards to MJF's medication or lack thereof during the taping of that commercial? Or are you just flinging out baseless accusations? Rush and then you made the accusation, the burden is on you to prove something, not us.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: daveymark
leave it to the libs to go off on a tangent that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. Is it that hard to pay attention? Perhaps the posters in here decided since MJF went off his meds one time, so too can the lib posters go off their ADD meds :laugh:

Physician, heal thyself.
 

Termagant

Senior member
Mar 10, 2006
765
0
0
Originally posted by: daveymark
leave it to the libs to go off on a tangent that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. Is it that hard to pay attention? Perhaps the posters in here decided since MJF went off his meds one time, so too can the lib posters go off their ADD meds :laugh:

Is it just me or are a certain demographic of posters becoming more hostile and incoherent as election day approaches?
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,784
6,342
126
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: daveymark
leave it to the libs to go off on a tangent that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. Is it that hard to pay attention? Perhaps the posters in here decided since MJF went off his meds one time, so too can the lib posters go off their ADD meds :laugh:

Is it just me or are a certain demographic of posters becoming more hostile and incoherent as election day approaches?

I think it's obvious to most.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: daveymark
leave it to the libs to go off on a tangent that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. Is it that hard to pay attention? Perhaps the posters in here decided since MJF went off his meds one time, so too can the lib posters go off their ADD meds :laugh:

Is it just me or are a certain demographic of posters becoming more hostile and incoherent as election day approaches?

Unfortunately I think there's a little of that on both sides of the aisle. It just so happens that most of the reasonable, articulate conservative posters (e.g., alchemize) are not showing up much anymore, leaving things to the bomb-throwers and dissemblers. It'll get worse before it gets better.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,755
11,374
136
Originally posted by: Aisengard
Smells like zendari in this thread...

I said that the other day, except it was "Stinks like zendari in here". Might have even been this thread. It does seem like they're back.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,857
31,346
146
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: Termagant
Originally posted by: daveymark
leave it to the libs to go off on a tangent that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic. Is it that hard to pay attention? Perhaps the posters in here decided since MJF went off his meds one time, so too can the lib posters go off their ADD meds :laugh:

Is it just me or are a certain demographic of posters becoming more hostile and incoherent as election day approaches?

Unfortunately I think there's a little of that on both sides of the aisle. It just so happens that most of the reasonable, articulate conservative posters (e.g., alchemize) are not showing up much anymore, leaving things to the bomb-throwers and dissemblers. It'll get worse before it gets better.


Amen. I remember my blood pressure at this time in '04 was high enough to turn Anne Coulter straight (I'm not the only one that finds her Adam's apple a bit strange, am I?). The sad thing is that the extreme wackos on either side will crawl out of their holes and become most vocal. Then they shut up soon after the election week b/c honestly...everything will settle back to the way it was. (Not to say that I'm not currently frightened about the state of our economy...but who didn't expect us heading to the sh1tter after '01?)
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: dahunan

Only person I can think of is Tastes Like Chicken.. but I could be wrong.

That's a possibility. Condor occurs to me as well (though I'm not sure he was ever banned). He's not angry enough to be Crimson or xxxJohnGaltxxx, smart enough to be CsG, or enough of a dopey post-and-run artist to be Riprorin. I definitely have the sense we've seen him before, though.

I vote for TastesLikeCHicken, but I don't know if he was banned or not??

If he was, then I'd be about 90% sure this ProfJohn = TLC.
 

1EZduzit

Lifer
Feb 4, 2002
11,833
1
0
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
We do, a viscious attack by an overweight drug addled hypocrite and the shameless support he receives from partisan assholes on the Fringe Right. It's all good though, it's having the opposite effect the Lunatic Fringe on the Right were hoping for.
You complain about a "vicious attack" by launching one of your own on Rush?
Why is what Rush said wrong, but what you just said right?

Aren't all of you with your "drug addict, pill popper, Viagra user, over weight, 3 ex wives, racist commentator" lines doing the kind of thing you are objecting to?

You forgot "draft dodging chichenhawk".

And I know you don't think it's "fair" but it is perfectly legit to point out an attacker's hypocrisy. Get used to it, the "liburahl pussies" you love to chastize are kicking ass and taking names and the more desperate the right becomes the more emboldened we become.

Take heart though, things will change again, in another 20 or 25 years.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Banned Member with a new ISP
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
We do, a viscious attack by an overweight drug addled hypocrite and the shameless support he receives from partisan assholes on the Fringe Right. It's all good though, it's having the opposite effect the Lunatic Fringe on the Right were hoping for.
You complain about a "vicious attack" by launching one of your own on Rush?
Why is what Rush said wrong, but what you just said right?

Aren't all of you with your "drug addict, pill popper, Viagra user, over weight, 3 ex wives, racist commentator" lines doing the kind of thing you are objecting to?
Fighting fire with fire. In addition everything I posted is fact where as what Rush said and you Right Wing Fringers agree with is not.
 

VooDooAddict

Golden Member
Jun 4, 2004
1,057
0
0
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
Have you any idea as to the nature of Parkinsons, duh? It's PERFECTLY NORMAL for sufferers to have good and bad days, often markedly so. Only the cruel or ignorant or both would think they could tell anything by a couple of appearances on TV.

QFT.

From my perspective, the purpose of his apearance was more to highten awarness of the nessesary for stem cell research and not to stump for a canidate. If you were fighting for a cause and someone offered your spokesperson airtime to talk to the people about the issue ... would you accept?
 

wiin

Senior member
Oct 28, 1999
937
0
76
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
1. Fox is obviously not off his drugs and looks as if he does not even have Parkinson?s.
Of course Fox is obviously on his drugs in his most recent ads as well.

In case you still don't get it, Fox has now publically said what every medical professional who knows about the subject already knew that his movements in the ad WERE A SIDE EFFECT OF TAKING HIS DRUGS FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE. The way he was acting is not actually caused by the disease itself but by the side effects of drugs for treatment of it.

The more "Prof" John keeps repeating this lame ass talking point from Rush about Fox being "off his meds," despite being proven wrong about a billion times now, the more ignorant he looks. Let him keep doing it!
Do you have PROOF that what we saw in the ad is because he took to much medicine? From what I have read on here it?s some Doctor who watched the Ad saying that this could be the effect of too much medicine.

Now it seems to me when Frist 'diagnosed" Shivo you guys all freaked out, just scroll back a few pages in this thread to see that effect. But now because some Doctor on TV says this may be what happened you all parrot it as if it is gospel? Am I misread this thread, or are you all doing exactly what you bitched about Rush doing?

?How can Rush tell if he is off his medicine by watching the ad? = bad
?A doctor and others say this is caused by too much medicine, he can tell because he saw the ad.? = good? Huh?

Fox himself said he was overmedicated in an interview with Couric.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,349
32,857
136
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: HomerJS
What's more misleading MJF or the self proclaimed King of Conservatism who conviently forgets...

3 ex wives
drug addict
going alone on vacation to a place that specializes in underage hookers with his bottle of Viagra with at least one missing. No I have it wrong Viagra does really come in bottles of 29!
You are a moron, Viagra is a prescription drug, it does not come in bottles of anything. The Doctor decides how many you get, if he wants you can get a bottle of 1.

I know this because I worked for Walgreens and would waste time in the pharmacy acting as a Pharm Tech counting pills and filling prescriptions.
Oooooh...moron?? I thought you guys dealt with logic not emotion? I'll do my best not to resort to name calling.

BTW - How does Rush's ass taste and smell since you have your head buried so far into it?

I'll explain so even you can understand, I mentioned the pill count not to debate the technicalities of perscriptions vs OTC medication. My point was a bottle of Viagra in a country which provides underage hookers I can conclude he was there soliciting 12 year old girls. Given this circumstantial evidence I still would not get on the air and say Limbaugh is screwing underage girls. But with even less evidence he got on the air and said MJF is either "acting" (same as faking) or off his medication (Frist diagnosis).



 
Aug 1, 2006
1,308
0
0
Originally posted by: wiin
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Originally posted by: Aegeon
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
1. Fox is obviously not off his drugs and looks as if he does not even have Parkinson?s.
Of course Fox is obviously on his drugs in his most recent ads as well.

In case you still don't get it, Fox has now publically said what every medical professional who knows about the subject already knew that his movements in the ad WERE A SIDE EFFECT OF TAKING HIS DRUGS FOR PARKINSON'S DISEASE. The way he was acting is not actually caused by the disease itself but by the side effects of drugs for treatment of it.

The more "Prof" John keeps repeating this lame ass talking point from Rush about Fox being "off his meds," despite being proven wrong about a billion times now, the more ignorant he looks. Let him keep doing it!
Do you have PROOF that what we saw in the ad is because he took to much medicine? From what I have read on here it?s some Doctor who watched the Ad saying that this could be the effect of too much medicine.

Now it seems to me when Frist 'diagnosed" Shivo you guys all freaked out, just scroll back a few pages in this thread to see that effect. But now because some Doctor on TV says this may be what happened you all parrot it as if it is gospel? Am I misread this thread, or are you all doing exactly what you bitched about Rush doing?

?How can Rush tell if he is off his medicine by watching the ad? = bad
?A doctor and others say this is caused by too much medicine, he can tell because he saw the ad.? = good? Huh?

Fox himself said he was overmedicated in an interview with Couric.

What he means is, these meds are difficult to regulate in the body. Of course, you're not going to believe that, so, whatever then!