Republicans in Arizona attempting mass voter fraud with the 2020 ballots.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
You seemed pretty certain that there was no tax payer money being used. Where did you get that idea? This is why people respond to you the way that they do.

And yet people dont acknowledge when I correct myself, and admit I was wrong. Like I did in this thread. I wonder why that is?
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,902
2,359
126
Oh looky here a right-wing nut job with a history of posting bullshit and supporting batshit crazy conspiracies wants a brownie point for admitting he was wrong this time... Fuck off!

Which batshit crazy conspiracy theory do you speak of? Honest question.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: VW MAN

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
Isn't voter/ballot privacy already tossed out the window by simple virtue of the fact the knuckleheads were given the originals?

No. All identifiers were separated from the ballots when they were initially counted. Once verified, ballots go one way & the signature slips go in another. There's no practical way to put them together again.
 

NWRMidnight

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
3,563
3,081
136
And yet people dont acknowledge when I correct myself, and admit I was wrong. Like I did in this thread. I wonder why that is?
Mr. dimbulb:
I suspect you where not acknowledged because you ended it by calling the person a prick, basically because he proved you where full of crap. Maybe you shouldn't have included that last part if you wanted your admittance of being wrong taken seriously because your last words are what people remember. Just a thought.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,023
12,266
136
So a guy who invented a hand held scanner shaped like a cat called a Qscanner, changed his name after it didn't work out so well, (made a popular PC magazines list of worst products of the 90s) is behind this mysterious fold detection process? Sorry, I'm watching TRMS and laughing so much.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,849
30,619
136
So a guy who invented a hand held scanner shaped like a cat called a Qscanner, changed his name after it didn't work out so well, (made a popular PC magazines list of worst products of the 90s) is behind this mysterious fold detection process? Sorry, I'm watching TRMS and laughing so much.
Remember it was a scanner that would then load ads on your PC from the company who had placed the ad in a magazine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

Meghan54

Lifer
Oct 18, 2009
11,684
5,228
136
Mr. dimbulb:
I suspect you where not acknowledged because you ended it by calling the person a prick, basically because he proved you where full of crap. Maybe you shouldn't have included that last part if you wanted your admittance of being wrong taken seriously because your last words are what people remember. Just a thought.

Lol...tragically and mortally wounded by my use of “dimbulb.” What a riot!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NWRMidnight

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,140
15,573
136
Propaganda firm OAN the only member of the media allowed to cover this charade. They are already putting out headlines of fraud found.

Can't the courts intercede and force an objective news source in the room? These are public ballots. They are not owned by the Republican Party.
OAN is basically a rebrand of RT right? Yea. How about breaking that Navalny dude out of prison and give him his own network to broadcast out of Ukraine?
 

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,439
2,397
136
I was apparently overly optimistic that once Trump was out of office the national emergency would be over. This turned out to be very wrong. Probably for the foreseeable future we are going to have to fight against a radicalized, fascist minority whose goal is to end democracy in America.

If anyone thinks that’s unfair or alarmist I would be interested to hear their argument as to why.

Yes, buckle up, it's only going to worse.

2024 will be ugly. I anticipate some states outright ignoring their own election laws and simply giving their votes to Trump or whoever runs "just because."

C'mon, we all know it's going to happen. The writing is on the wall, clear as day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,934
55,287
136
Yes, buckle up, it's only going to worse.

2024 will be ugly. I anticipate some states outright ignoring their own election laws and simply giving their votes to Trump or whoever runs "just because."

C'mon, we all know it's going to happen. The writing is on the wall, clear as day.
I personally doubt Trump will run in 2024 and if he does I'm not even sure he would win the nomination - his support for being the GOP nominee already seems to be deteriorating and I expect him to take a similar trajectory to Palin. If I had to bet I would say that he or one of his close family members will have been indicted by that point anyway so he may have bigger fish to fry than trying to run for office.
 

gothuevos

Diamond Member
Jul 28, 2010
3,439
2,397
136
I personally doubt Trump will run in 2024 and if he does I'm not even sure he would win the nomination - his support for being the GOP nominee already seems to be deteriorating and I expect him to take a similar trajectory to Palin. If I had to bet I would say that he or one of his close family members will have been indicted by that point anyway so he may have bigger fish to fry than trying to run for office.

True....a lot can happen in the next few years.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,023
12,266
136
So a guy who invented a hand held scanner shaped like a cat called a Qscanner, changed his name after it didn't work out so well, (made a popular PC magazines list of worst products of the 90s) is behind this mysterious fold detection process? Sorry, I'm watching TRMS and laughing so much.
I forgot to add, that they showed a picture of the guy in his role as a treasure hunter, that happens to write books about treasures to be found in every state. I have seen that fool on I think one of the big goofy Josh Gates shows on Discovery Channel.
 
Feb 4, 2009
35,862
17,403
136
Yes, buckle up, it's only going to worse.

2024 will be ugly. I anticipate some states outright ignoring their own election laws and simply giving their votes to Trump or whoever runs "just because."

C'mon, we all know it's going to happen. The writing is on the wall, clear as day.

This is a scary though and I think there is a chance it could occur.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,918
2,883
136
And yet people dont acknowledge when I correct myself, and admit I was wrong. Like I did in this thread. I wonder why that is?
That's because after it happens so many times you come off as dishonest. Notice how you refuse to answer where you got your incorrect information from? I'm guessing it's where you always get your incorrect information. Maybe it's time to reevaluate where you get your news from.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,564
10,241
136
Yes, buckle up, it's only going to worse.

2024 will be ugly. I anticipate some states outright ignoring their own election laws and simply giving their votes to Trump or whoever runs "just because."

C'mon, we all know it's going to happen. The writing is on the wall, clear as day.
2024? As if the GQP won't be using every dirty trick in the book to turn the House/Senate back over to their control in 2022!

Example: Recalling Newsome would give the GQP the ability to appoint a new Secretary of State, which would also give them the power to purge voter rolls and mess with voting machines. Thank God they can't mess with redistricting, or they'd do that too. Turning Orange County red again is a priority for retaking the House.