Thump553
Lifer
- Jun 2, 2000
- 12,669
- 2,424
- 126
Slick dirty play by the pollsters by hiring a former intern of the judge as counsel thus requiring the assigned judge (who had already ruled against them) to withdraw from the case.
This is a casebook study of corruption from top to bottom in the GOP party-all to "win" a meaningless election fraud finding for PR. It is pretty clear that the real fraudsters are in charge of this recount.
On what possible basis could the methods and procedures used to recount a public election be possibly held to be secret from the public? That is beyond absurdity.
This is a casebook study of corruption from top to bottom in the GOP party-all to "win" a meaningless election fraud finding for PR. It is pretty clear that the real fraudsters are in charge of this recount.
On what possible basis could the methods and procedures used to recount a public election be possibly held to be secret from the public? That is beyond absurdity.