Matt1970
Lifer
- Mar 19, 2007
- 12,320
- 3
- 0
Going down this path you can say ACA also didn't effect the economy. If anything it shows that ACA = better economy.
Except any effects of the mandate would be in 2014's numbers.
Going down this path you can say ACA also didn't effect the economy. If anything it shows that ACA = better economy.
Going down this path you can say ACA also didn't effect the economy. If anything it shows that ACA = better economy.
You could also say Olympics in London improved the US economy, or a million other things.
This is why his post was so silly. Actual economic analysis showed the sequester hurt the economy.
Oh ya, silly me, I mean GDP growth was only 50% higher in the sequestration year than it was the year before. That sure is some signs of catastrophic results.
Oh ya, silly me, I mean GDP growth was only 50% higher in the sequestration year than it was the year before. That sure is some signs of catastrophic results.
Do you care at all what actual economists determined?
Do you care at all about a 50% increase in GDP growth from the year before?
Better yet, can you point to any evidence that attributes that increase to the sequestration?
Do you care at all what actual economists determined?
Except any effects of the mandate would be in 2014's numbers.
Nice try, this is about the sequestration being catastrophic to the economy.
is that why brought up the topic of GDP in the first place? You seemed so proud of those stats you pointed out...
How about i make it easier for you. Can you point to any evidence that shows the sequestration did not have a negative effect on the economy or were those GDP numbers your "evidence"?
Nice try, this is about the sequestration...
LOL! I'm remembering back when libs were throwing a hissy like that bit of political theatre was the end of the world. Now, you can hardly find one that even remembers it.
It's amazing how politicians pull the strings of their willing puppets. They'll all dance and bend over and spread whenever the next big "sky is falling!" bit of theatre is staged too.
Going down this path you can say ACA also didn't effect the economy. If anything it shows that ACA = better economy.
Do you care at all about a 50% increase in GDP growth from the year before?
You guys are measuring GDP. Forcing people to buy shit they don't want is going to help increase GDP ya dummies. Disposable income is where its at.
"Retail sales slump in nearly every category"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/.../retail-sales-slump-in-nearly-every-category/
Cause that just screams awesome economy.
Oh look check the first comment. I don't even have to try.
Retail sales increased 0.3% last month, roughly in line with the 0.2% jump expected by economists surveyed by Action Economics. Excluding volatile auto purchases, sales rose 0.3%.
The rise "was even stronger than it looks because the headline figure was depressed by a price-related drop in gasoline station sales,'' says economist Paul Diggle of Capital Economics.
Do you care that according to the CBO that economic growth would have been about a point higher without sequestration?
You might think 1% if GDP doesn't matter, but we are talking about approximately $150 billion in economic output we flushed down the toilet every year due to them. It was also estimated at costing us somewhere around a million jobs economy wide.
The economy grew despite sequestration, but at a lower level and with fewer jobs. It's funny that the guys saying we should focus on the economy have a policy that damaged the economy as their crown jewel of the past few years.
Oh well, as long as it's a CBO projection, those are never wrong. /s
Look pal, in 2013 the GDP grew at the fastest pace since maybe 2006. When you start using projections over the actual results, maybe it's time to re-think your theory.
No, they are just doing actual economic analysis as opposed to what you're doing.
By your logic if I can just say the economy grew in 2013 because I moved to a new apartment that year.
Actual economists doing real research say it hurt the economy. Why is that so hard to accept?
Actual economists doing real research say it hurt the economy. Why is that so hard to accept?
I am not the one having a problem accepting things. The doom and gloom wasn't there, the catastrophe wasn't there, the double dip recession wasn't there. 2013 did a lot better than anyone predicted. Sorry you cannot accept that.
